I dislike x86 greatly
Anything not hosted on a T1 connection meant to hold 16 CS players sucks, period.
3rd: Moodswings? I'm not the one cursing, crying, and bitching about how Screenor > you.
I beleive I said we have a central located server already, don't waste your time finding one.
Someone's just pissed because they failed to join x86 :p
Someone's just pissed cause they can't beat Screenor.
I already warned you once. This is your last warning. Don't push it.
1. Nobody cares if you dislike us. If you dislike us so much, then why are you here? To "challenge" us?
You know we aren't a gaming clan, what exactly are you challenging us to? What did you expect us to do, with you coming here saying "OMG WE CHALLENGE JOO DO JOO ACCEPT?"
Did you expect us to go "omg we bow down to teh scr33n0r fa3r?"
You know us, you know we're not a gaming clan, there's obviously some other purpose for you asking here. I just can't see it.
2. How about a T3? OC-12? OC-48? A gigabit line?
How about 1mbps upstream cable? That's enough bandwidth for 16 players on a 1.6 CS Server. Especially if some are locally playing.
As for what you are saying, the "scrimage" seems to be 5v5. A simple DSL connection dedicated to the server can handle that.
3. How is he cursing, crying, and bitching about how him > you, exactly? Maybe he doesn't like your attitude (neither do I) or maybe he is defending your post where you called Towelie's CS box (and I guess, in general, our boxes) "shitty 5.1 MHz computers" and stating the latency issue may have been on your side.
4. No you didn't. You said "It will be played on a real server", not "we already have a server, don't waste your time finding one."
What if someone here sticks a 3.0 GHz 1024MB RAM server on a T3 connection line? Will you change your mind?
5. Warrior's comment hurt apparently.