a new BNCSutil?

[vector]

Well, the latest version for me would be 1.3.1.1. Is there a later version lingering around somewhere, and more importantly, does it support local hashing for SC?

[Hdx]

no
Nobody has bothered to recompile BNCSutil with lockdown support.
Nore do I have the source to do it.
~Hdx

[vector]

I heard that ForstWraith has the source to 1.3.3. Perhaps you guys could work on that source?

[Camel]

I'm sure you could find what you're looking for with a Google search. In any case, you're better off using BNLS_VERSIONCHECKEX2 because it ensures that your bot will always be able to pass the version check.

[Hdx]

I'm sure he knows that, but that required a depandacy on a JBLS/BNLS server.
Which in this day and age isn't that big of a deal.
But he may still want to have the option of doing it locally. If someone can get me the latest source for BNCsutil.dll I'll see what I can do.
Hdx@JBLS.org
~Hdx

[Camel]

Do a Google search; you'll find it.

[Hdx]

All google searches i've done here at school are blocked.
I'm not a fucking moron, I'm just to lazy to try and get around it.
~Hdx

[vector]

Oh no, I'm not very good at programming. (Haven't gotten into TCP/IP either). It's just I'm heavily into the idea of making SC work for local hashing.

You say there is a BNCLutil with SC hashing support? I mean, what's so different with a JBLS/BNLS server being able to hash SC than BNCSutil?

[Hdx]

Nothing, Just the fact that no one has felt like updating BNCSutil.dll to allow for lockdown.
~Hdx

[Joe]

With all due respect, if you can't do TCP/IP, you shouldn't even think about getting anywhere near Lockdown.

[MyndFyre]

Why?  They're not nearly related.

And why the bump almost a full month after the fact?

[Joe]

Level of complexity, though.

And I didn't notice how old this was. Wow, this board is stale.