You need someone to install your memory but you're going to criticize Microsoft? LOL
No, I'm at work. It's a stupid policy they have; I have no control over it.
I'm not saying that I demand perfection from every piece of software I use, but I am saying that Microsoft - someone is here to install ram, i'll finish this later
...but I am saying that Microsoft does not live up to the standards that are set by every operating system that isn't Windows. Of course, it's reasonable to say that it's possible that more vulnerabilities have been found because it's a bigger target, but I think it's also reasonable to say "come on, everyone knows it's just less secure."
In any event, this isn't really the reason I jumped in to the topic, my intent was to show that Warrior's attack was overzealous. Sure, it's a bug, and it has pretty serious consequences, but it's unreasonable to make that kind of a comparison to Windows. For starters, the products don't even target the same markets. The overlap is almost exclusively limited to home computers, and even there Microsoft has a huge hold on the market, but it has been shrinking at a substantial rate ever since Apple switched to Intel processors.
On a completely unrelated note, the wireless connection at my apartment sucks. There are 28 visible access points, and even if I pick a channel that is unused, I'm still lucky to get a couple megabits of throughput with line-of-sight to the AP. I've been plugging in to the router every time I need to transfer files across the network. It's still reasonable to download files from the internet over the wireless (we have an 8Mbit cable connection).