Author Topic: 3 blacks break in, beat kid, 2 shot dead, 3rd black charged w/murder. Race card  (Read 6056 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
3 black guys broke into a house and "brutally beat" a guy's step son (this 19y/o kid was beat with a bat to the point that he has brain damage and can no longer feed himself).  The home owner shot 2 of the black guys dead, the 3rd managed to get away and is now charged with murder.  Under CA law if you commit a crime and it is foreseeable that the homeowner respond with fatal force it is your problem and you get tagged with murder.  Here in NM if a homicide occurs during a felony you get pegged with murder no matter what.

So the black guy is charged with murder, sounds OK, right?  Not according to the NAACP.  They're claiming racism.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071116/ap_on_re_us/break_in_murder;_ylt=AmiEfCAydx9PzXhiqpI6Rz1H2ocA


The black guy SHOULD get the murder, robbery, burglary, and assault with a deadly weapon.  Hell, tack on any charges you can come up with (trespassing, failure to use a turn signal, whatever).  Lock him away, preferably execute him ... whatever.
The NAACP is becoming racist in their own right :(

Offline Blaze

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7136
  • Canadian
    • View Profile
    • Maide
That law shouldn't be invoked here, I think.  In the article they use another example of when a police officer attempted to arrest someone and accidentally hit another person with the car and killed them; I believe THAT is when this law should be used.  It's not the black guys fault his friends died directly.  I agree with the charges of: burglary, and assault with a deadly weapon.
And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Since I don't know the specific wording of the law, I can only rely on what a neutral lawyer said "they have to show that it was reasonably foreseeable that the criminal enterprise could trigger a fatal response from the homeowner"
...homeowner = the black guy should hang

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Under CA law if you commit a crime and it is foreseeable that the homeowner respond with fatal force it is your problem and you get tagged with murder.
That doesn't even make sense. By what you posted, if I break into the house belonging to a survival nut with a collection of guns, that's sufficient to be charged for murder? I think you're missing something there..

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
That's the law, I didn't come up with it.

In NM if you commit a felony that results in a death you get charged with murder, felony murder rule.

Offline Blaze

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7136
  • Canadian
    • View Profile
    • Maide
That's the law, I didn't come up with it.

In NM if you commit a felony that results in a death you get charged with murder, felony murder rule.

The point is it might be law, but it's almost never used unless there's public demand for it.  I'm sure the families of the dead don't want this man to be charged with their murder.
And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
I bet the family that were the victims would like him charged with murder

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
That's the law, I didn't come up with it.

In NM if you commit a felony that results in a death you get charged with murder, felony murder rule.
You didn't say anything about it resulting in a death.

I bet the family that were the victims would like him charged with murder
That would be a completely irrelevant charge, since he didn't commit murder. If the families of the people they were robbing actually want that, then they're totally being unreasonable. He should be punished for what he did, yes, but not for what he didn't do.

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
That's the law, I didn't come up with it.

In NM if you commit a felony that results in a death you get charged with murder, felony murder rule.
You didn't say anything about it resulting in a death.
I said "fatal force was foreseeable," that implies death is foreseeable


Quote
I bet the family that were the victims would like him charged with murder
That would be a completely irrelevant charge, since he didn't commit murder. If the families of the people they were robbing actually want that, then they're totally being unreasonable. He should be punished for what he did, yes, but not for what he didn't do.
http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?selected=741&bold=||||
What is reasonable is that a death is probable (not possible, PROBABLE) ... that's why we have the felony murder rule

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
I said "fatal force was foreseeable," that implies death is foreseeable
Are you saying that somebody could be charged for murder when nobody dies? There's a difference between something being foreseeable and that thing actually happening.

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
I said "fatal force was foreseeable," that implies death is foreseeable
Are you saying that somebody could be charged for murder when nobody dies? There's a difference between something being foreseeable and that thing actually happening.
The law just provides that if someone dies and it is foreseeable you're (a dude committing the crime) is up for the charge of murder.

You're getting off topic.

Offline zorm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
    • View Profile
    • Zorm's Page
Man did you hear about the guy in Texas? He dialed 911 because people were burglarizing his neighbors house and told the 911 operator he was going to kill them. He apparently left the phone on and went outside and fire a warning shot and told them to freeze. Three shotgun blasts later and there were two dead buglars!

Talk about awesome!
"Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora"
- William of Ockham

Offline Killer360

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 752
    • View Profile
Fuck the NAACP.

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Man did you hear about the guy in Texas? He dialed 911 because people were burglarizing his neighbors house and told the 911 operator he was going to kill them. He apparently left the phone on and went outside and fire a warning shot and told them to freeze. Three shotgun blasts later and there were two dead buglars!

Talk about awesome!
That's the way to do it!  Just call 911 to tell them to send an ambulance/coroner cause you're about to kill some guys breaking into your house!  Rock oN!

Offline Blaze

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7136
  • Canadian
    • View Profile
    • Maide
Man did you hear about the guy in Texas? He dialed 911 because people were burglarizing his neighbors house and told the 911 operator he was going to kill them. He apparently left the phone on and went outside and fire a warning shot and told them to freeze. Three shotgun blasts later and there were two dead buglars!

Talk about awesome!
That's the way to do it! Just call 911 to tell them to send an ambulance/coroner cause you're about to kill some guys breaking into your house! Rock oN!

You people have no value for life, do you?
And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...