Author Topic: Battle.net  (Read 6411 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
Battle.net
« on: December 05, 2007, 11:24:28 am »
Anyone still there?
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2007, 11:46:30 am »
Every week.

Offline ZeroX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1933
  • Pirating Your software since 1998
    • View Profile
    • Crap
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2007, 01:13:56 pm »
Starcraft 2 IMO. x86 needs to re make the channel and BS all over.
Zeroforce
Zeroforce
Zeroforce





Quote
mutsumibear: David's coming over Sunday so we can have mad sex all day.
zxdropoff: lucky you
mutsumibear: :D I know.
mutsumibear: I just pray I don't start my period before then.
zxdropoff: omfg
zxdropoff: stfu
zxdropoff: now please
mutsumibear: HAHA
mutsumibear: I love disturbing you.

Offline Falcon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
  • I haven't visited my profile!
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2007, 10:23:02 pm »
I'm there for dota only.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2007, 10:44:28 pm »
Starcraft 2 IMO. x86 needs to re make the channel and BS all over.

x86 needs a true clan channel. I'm willing to maintain it, and if I'm given a few CD-Keys, load enough bots to handle expiration.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline AntiVirus

  • Legendary
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
  • Best
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2007, 02:14:02 am »
After I killed my clan I quit.. and haven't been back on since. :D *claps*
The once grove of splendor,
Aforetime crowned by lilac and lily,
Lay now forevermore slender;
And all winds that liven
Silhouette a lone existence;
A leafless oak grasping at eternity.


"They say that I must learn to kill before I can feel safe, but I rather kill myself then turn into their slave."
- The Rasmus

Offline ZeroX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1933
  • Pirating Your software since 1998
    • View Profile
    • Crap
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2007, 01:37:21 pm »
Will starcraft 2 use the same b.net that the other cilents do? Like with the whole /join Op x86 type channels set up games and go join them type deal? Havent heard anything from blizzard on the sort yet.
Zeroforce
Zeroforce
Zeroforce





Quote
mutsumibear: David's coming over Sunday so we can have mad sex all day.
zxdropoff: lucky you
mutsumibear: :D I know.
mutsumibear: I just pray I don't start my period before then.
zxdropoff: omfg
zxdropoff: stfu
zxdropoff: now please
mutsumibear: HAHA
mutsumibear: I love disturbing you.

Offline Killer360

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 752
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2007, 01:49:04 pm »
Will starcraft 2 use the same b.net that the other cilents do? Like with the whole /join Op x86 type channels set up games and go join them type deal? Havent heard anything from blizzard on the sort yet.
I hope not. Battle.net needs to be completely revamped IMO.

Offline SNiFFeR

  • Sexy
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
    • k
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2007, 05:46:06 pm »
I am on battle.net everyday. (Op []@USEast)

Offline Blaze

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7136
  • Canadian
    • View Profile
    • Maide
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2007, 06:02:10 pm »
Will starcraft 2 use the same b.net that the other cilents do? Like with the whole /join Op x86 type channels set up games and go join them type deal? Havent heard anything from blizzard on the sort yet.
I hope not. Battle.net needs to be completely revamped IMO.

Blizzard has already stated that they're using Battle.Net for StarCraft II.  They have a lot of plans for revamping Battle.Net before they launch it, though, so stay tuned.
And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...

Offline Camel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1703
    • View Profile
    • BNU Bot
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2007, 12:03:05 am »
Clan BNU@USEast all day ^_^

<Camel> i said what what
<Blaze> in the butt
<Camel> you want to do it in my butt?
<Blaze> in my butt
<Camel> let's do it in the butt
<Blaze> Okay!

Offline Furious

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1833
  • I hate rabbits
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2007, 08:39:06 am »
Battle what...?

 ;)

Haven't been on in ages.
Quote
[23:04:34] <deadly7[x86]> Newby[x86]
[23:04:35] <deadly7[x86]> YOU ARE AN EMO
[23:04:39] <Newby[x86]> shush it woman

Quote
[17:53:31] InsaneJoey[e2] was banned by x86 (GO EAT A BAG OF FUCK ASSHOLE (randomban)).

Quote from: Ergot
Put it this way Joe... you're on my Buddy List... if there's no one else on an you're the only one, I'd rather talk to myself.

Offline Warrior

  • supreme mac daddy of trolls
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7503
  • One for a Dime two for a Quarter!
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2007, 06:51:18 am »
[2. Trade] is the new Op x86. True story.
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2007, 12:10:31 pm »
Actually I'm thinking of integrating Starcraft Leagues with Facebook Platform and I'm hoping that I can get Blizzard to buy into it (by doing something like giving away Starcraft 2 beta keys or something).  We all know damn well that Starcraft 2 will be coming out soon and it'll have the league functionality built in.
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2007, 12:15:06 pm »
We all know damn well that Starcraft 2 will be coming out soon

Hahahaha.  You're so funny. :)

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #15 on: December 11, 2007, 02:05:34 pm »
We all know damn well that Starcraft 2 will be coming out soon

Hahahaha.  You're so funny. :)
I'm sorry.  By "soon" I mean "in the next decade."
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline Hitmen

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1913
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2007, 06:25:24 pm »
I'm sorry.  By "soon" I mean "in the next decade."
This Blizzard accepted phrase is "When it's ready." Which usually means in the next decade.
Quote
(22:15:39) Newby: it hurts to swallow

Offline warz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1134
    • View Profile
    • chyea.org
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2007, 06:31:56 pm »
[2. Trade] is the new Op x86. True story.

Murloc: Impossible
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Murloc
Murlocs in Black
Star War Episode VII: Return of the Murloc
http://www.chyea.org/ - web based markup debugger

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Battle.net
« Reply #18 on: December 12, 2007, 08:57:24 am »
Well, would you prefer it to be on time and rushed/sucky, or late and good quality?

Or, most likely, late and sucky? :)