Foobar vs Winamp

[Armin]

Which do you prefer, and why?

[Joe]

RhythmBox.

But I liked Foobar over Winamp. Winamp crashed and burned my entire library once. Eh.

[warz]

I haven't used Winamp in years. I used to use it all the time, though. About the time they introduced the version that played videos was when I stopped using it.

[truste1]

I used Winamp a lot but now I just use iTunes. Didn't really like Foobar though the few times I used it.

[rabbit]

I still use winamp, and love it.

[Hitmen]

I've used winamp for like 10000 years but started playing with foobar lately. It can take some effort to set up but it's pretty hot:



Fast and lightweight even with a huge library. (using like 4mb of ram when playing in the background)

Winamp is easier to just play a couple files in but I'm starting to like foobar a lot more for having all my music in it.

[Newby]

On OS X, I'm just using iTunes.

That's a pretty Foobar, btw.

[Towelie]

I've used winamp for like 10000 years but started playing with foobar lately. It can take some effort to set up but it's pretty hot:



Fast and lightweight even with a huge library. (using like 4mb of ram when playing in the background)

Winamp is easier to just play a couple files in but I'm starting to like foobar a lot more for having all my music in it.

This has inspired me to listen to Artillery ;P

[Blaze]

Downloading foobar now.  I hate iTunes, way too bulky/slow.

[Camel]

I've been using fb2k for years, never looked back.

[leet_muffin]

Artillery is the shit.