So the widespread use of emojis these days kinda makes forum smileys pointless, yeah?
0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.
In snowed in Baghdad, China had coldest winter in 100 years, and snow cover in Siberia, Mongolia, China, and North America is more than since 1966.http://www.dailytech.com/Temperature+Monitors+Report+Worldwide+Global+Cooling/article10866.htmhttp://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=332289Global Cooling, EVERYONE PANIC!
Warmer temperatures only means life moves, not dies.
That's true to a point, but severe weather can destroy life, and that's one of the outcomes of global climate change.
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there
Our species really annoys me.
Severe weather already exists, warming would just change the course.
And it's safe to assume that we should stop the warming? What if THAT throws us into a spin of global cooling like suggested in the 70s?
Quote from: iago on March 03, 2008, 07:38:41 pmThat's true to a point, but severe weather can destroy life, and that's one of the outcomes of global climate change. *possible. Note that we haven't conducted experiments to validate this possibility.
Quote from: CrAz3D on March 03, 2008, 08:19:01 pmAnd it's safe to assume that we should stop the warming? What if THAT throws us into a spin of global cooling like suggested in the 70s?He didn't say that. And while I think it's unsafe to assume it (for the same reasons Rule listed), I think your counter is retarded.
Quote from: MyndFyre on March 03, 2008, 08:07:20 pmQuote from: iago on March 03, 2008, 07:38:41 pmThat's true to a point, but severe weather can destroy life, and that's one of the outcomes of global climate change. *possible. Note that we haven't conducted experiments to validate this possibility.Well, yeah. I'm writing under the assumption that human-caused-climate-change is happening, which includes that. Quote from: MyndFyre on March 03, 2008, 08:28:32 pmQuote from: CrAz3D on March 03, 2008, 08:19:01 pmAnd it's safe to assume that we should stop the warming? What if THAT throws us into a spin of global cooling like suggested in the 70s?He didn't say that. And while I think it's unsafe to assume it (for the same reasons Rule listed), I think your counter is retarded.See why arguing with CrAz3d is both fun and horrible?
Quote from: iago on March 03, 2008, 08:30:59 pmQuote from: MyndFyre on March 03, 2008, 08:07:20 pmQuote from: iago on March 03, 2008, 07:38:41 pmThat's true to a point, but severe weather can destroy life, and that's one of the outcomes of global climate change. *possible. Note that we haven't conducted experiments to validate this possibility.Well, yeah. I'm writing under the assumption that human-caused-climate-change is happening, which includes that. Quote from: MyndFyre on March 03, 2008, 08:28:32 pmQuote from: CrAz3D on March 03, 2008, 08:19:01 pmAnd it's safe to assume that we should stop the warming? What if THAT throws us into a spin of global cooling like suggested in the 70s?He didn't say that. And while I think it's unsafe to assume it (for the same reasons Rule listed), I think your counter is retarded.See why arguing with CrAz3d is both fun and horrible? Isn't it though?! I wish I could argue with me sometimes
Arguing with a wall isn't arguing with me. It might be similar, but it can't argue back