There is an art and a science to everything. To argue one or the other, or one over the other, is pretty pointless. It's like a question that seems fascinating at first but then turns out to be obvious and unfascinating.
No offense intended for you or whoever wrote the survey, but I don't think the survey is well-constructed. It's impossible to answer questions like "is photography more of an art or a science?" You simply can't make the comparison -- there is no relation with a consistent set of rules that could offer such a comparison. Also, many of the questions are too vague to extract any real information, like asking "what is the purpose of photography?" It is far too metaphysical, and will only achieve whimsical answers. Furthermore, when the survey is ambiguous as to whether the art of science of photography is in question, it is hard to know what's expected of a prompt like "what makes a good photo for you?"