« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: x86 on IRC  (Read 11578 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
x86 on IRC
« on: May 24, 2005, 11:05:42 pm »
For those of you that didn't know, x86 has been on IRC, for months. I've recently seen some of you idling #vl, and have NEVER seen you in our IRC channel, that's just lame.

Anyway....

Server: irc.tehnetwork.org:6667

Channel: #x86


Note: If you're going to be as immature as is seen sometimes in the channel, and on these forums. Stick to the battle.net channel and don't even waste our time by coming to the channel. <3
Logged
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2005, 11:06:52 pm »
I agree.

If you missed the news announcement on it that was around for a while, you need help.
Logged
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 pm
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 am
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline Warrior

  • supreme mac daddy of trolls
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7503
  • One for a Dime two for a Quarter!
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2005, 11:22:17 pm »
pshh #x86 is boring. Even stricter and crappier than the channel. I wonder if we should all but on our R2D2 costumes and do precise reciept calculations with our nipples.
Logged
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2005, 11:41:42 pm »
Wtf? Thats why we abandoned the channel.
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2005, 12:47:36 am »
If you have a problem with the moderation on IRC (which is noticably stricter, since we really don't want immaturity around on IRC), stick to Battle.net.
Logged
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 pm
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 am
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2005, 08:47:24 am »
Quote from: Newby on May 25, 2005, 12:47:36 am
If you have a problem with the moderation on IRC (which is noticably stricter, since we really don't want immaturity around on IRC), stick to Battle.net.

./signed
Logged
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2005, 11:27:17 am »
Quote from: Newby on May 25, 2005, 12:47:36 am
If you have a problem with the moderation on IRC (which is noticably stricter, since we really don't want immaturity around on IRC), stick to Battle.net.

/sign

:)
Logged

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2005, 02:20:23 pm »
I'm sad. I write an IRC client so that I have a decent interface to chat with you all on, and you aren't ever on. Gr.

Anyhow, the channels registered to me now, instead of Newby. Newby, if you want it back, contact me.

Anyhow, get on!
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

Offline drka

  • ffdshow > in_mp3.dll
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 330
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2005, 09:53:01 pm »
make one that can be used on a website.

*slobbers at activex*

edit:even if you make an IRC client, ChatZilla will own it.
Logged

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2005, 11:45:19 pm »
GET ON.

k?
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

dx

  • Guest
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2005, 08:22:35 pm »
Quote from: Newby on May 25, 2005, 12:47:36 am
If you have a problem with the moderation on IRC (which is noticably stricter, since we really don't want immaturity around on IRC), stick to Battle.net.
Stricter? Oh, you might actually take action against idiots because it's NOT battle.net?
Logged

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2005, 08:27:22 pm »
Quote from: dx on September 19, 2005, 08:22:35 pm
Quote from: Newby on May 25, 2005, 12:47:36 am
If you have a problem with the moderation on IRC (which is noticably stricter, since we really don't want immaturity around on IRC), stick to Battle.net.
Stricter? Oh, you might actually take action against idiots because it's NOT battle.net?

Yes.
Logged
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 pm
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 am
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2005, 07:06:20 am »
I used go, but nobody set me to +v, so I gave up.
Logged

dx

  • Guest
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2005, 03:07:18 pm »
Why do you need to be +v? Besides the occasional time they might have the channel mode set to +m...
Logged

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #14 on: September 20, 2005, 03:18:50 pm »
Which is generally only when bsd joins..
Logged
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
« previous next »