I wholly disagree. Warrior was one of the most destructive elements to the clan.
I have an issue with giving rights to certain members but not to other members -- I'm of the feeling that all members should be treated equally. The issue is, people like Warrior will exploit the rights however he can, and get angry if people try to stop him. He'll look for any crack in the rules and try to force it open. As a result, if I want to treat all members equally, I have to restrict the rights of *all* members, and that hurts things.
He's also the type to use threats and intimidation to get his way. He'll make demands, and threaten you if he doesn't think he's going to get them. And the worst part is, when people notice that what he does works, they start doing it to (to an extent). I mean, if it works for him, why wouldn't it work for me?
As a result of these, it's my opinion that he was driving people away and, to an extent, tearing the forum apart. You don't see the conversations that happen on the members board, but I think you'd understand it a lot better if you did. It got to the point where 86% of the members thought he was destructive to the clan -- that's a pretty good majority.