Author Topic: Impact ... *pulls hair out*  (Read 8217 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: Impact ... *pulls hair out*
« Reply #15 on: July 01, 2010, 02:18:27 pm »
Say that to Orwell.

Orwell is not a linguist. Linguists study language. Languages change! It's the nature of language.

Moral of the story? If you're upset with the change of the word "impact" to mean "affect" you should also be upset with the word "google" being used as a substitute for the verb phrase "to search" and you should be upset with any other semantic change that happens with a word.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2010, 02:20:28 pm by Newby »
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline nslay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
  • Giraffe meat, mmm
    • View Profile
Re: Impact ... *pulls hair out*
« Reply #16 on: July 01, 2010, 04:00:29 pm »
now your just being silly

raises the question?
Not to mention you're*

You've been trolled ;)


Clearly
[latex]
\text{Trolling Factor} = \frac{\text{Responder word count} \times (1 + \text{Responder expletives ratio})}{\text{Troll word count}}
[/latex]

So
[latex]
\text{Trolling outcome} = \begin{cases}
\text{Success} & \text{ if Trolling factor} \geq 1 \\
\text{Failure} & \text{ if Trolling factor} < 1
\end{cases}
[/latex]

Clearly, for my case
[latex]
\text{Trolling factor} \ll 1
[/latex]
So it's a failed outcome :(
An adorable giant isopod!

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Re: Impact ... *pulls hair out*
« Reply #17 on: July 01, 2010, 07:08:09 pm »
too hard to remember "effect" v. "affect?"   ???

Nothing to do with this, but hey, we're glad you're confused. =P
Negative ghost rider.  Impact is used in lieu of affect because ppl can't remember difference

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Impact ... *pulls hair out*
« Reply #18 on: July 02, 2010, 05:47:27 am »
Languages change! It's the nature of language.

Tell that to Latin.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: Impact ... *pulls hair out*
« Reply #19 on: July 02, 2010, 07:29:05 am »
A quick Google search produced these:
Impact Does Not Mean to Affect
Impact as a noun
...

To me, it sounds almost as annoying as, "I'm doing good."  If you don't know why that's wrong, then go back to the 6th grade ... it's where I learned, "I'm doing well!".

But what if someone actually is doing good?

Offline Blaze

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7136
  • Canadian
    • View Profile
    • Maide
Re: Impact ... *pulls hair out*
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2010, 08:02:43 am »
A quick Google search produced these:
Impact Does Not Mean to Affect
Impact as a noun
...

To me, it sounds almost as annoying as, "I'm doing good."  If you don't know why that's wrong, then go back to the 6th grade ... it's where I learned, "I'm doing well!".

But what if someone actually is doing good?

Well, that's good.
And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...

Offline deadly7

  • 42
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6496
    • View Profile
Re: Impact ... *pulls hair out*
« Reply #21 on: July 02, 2010, 10:45:37 am »
A quick Google search produced these:
Impact Does Not Mean to Affect
Impact as a noun
...

To me, it sounds almost as annoying as, "I'm doing good."  If you don't know why that's wrong, then go back to the 6th grade ... it's where I learned, "I'm doing well!".

But what if someone actually is doing good?

Well, that's good.
Good god, that's well!
[17:42:21.609] <Ergot> Kutsuju you're girlfrieds pussy must be a 403 error for you
 [17:42:25.585] <Ergot> FORBIDDEN

on IRC playing T&T++
<iago> He is unarmed
<Hitmen> he has no arms?!

on AIM with a drunk mythix:
(00:50:05) Mythix: Deadly
(00:50:11) Mythix: I'm going to fuck that red dot out of your head.
(00:50:15) Mythix: with my nine

Offline nslay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
  • Giraffe meat, mmm
    • View Profile
Re: Impact ... *pulls hair out*
« Reply #22 on: July 02, 2010, 11:05:44 am »
A quick Google search produced these:
Impact Does Not Mean to Affect
Impact as a noun
...

To me, it sounds almost as annoying as, "I'm doing good."  If you don't know why that's wrong, then go back to the 6th grade ... it's where I learned, "I'm doing well!".

But what if someone actually is doing good?
That's funny! :)
It would be an odd response to, "How are you?"

Quote
Person A: How are you?
*Person B donates money to charity*
Person B: I'm doing good.
An adorable giant isopod!

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: Impact ... *pulls hair out*
« Reply #23 on: July 02, 2010, 02:12:26 pm »
Aha, but it's a completely reasonable response to "What are you doing?"