Happy New Year! Yes, the current one, not a previous one; this is a new post, we swear!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Son, if you really want something in this life, you have to work for it. Now quiet! They're about to announce the lottery numbers. - Homer Simpson
This game runs on shitty video cards (geforce 6500) well, but I'm not buying it.
Quote from: Blaze on July 27, 2010, 02:50:39 pmThis game runs on shitty video cards (geforce 6500) well, but I'm not buying it.No... Starcraft 1 ran on shitty video cards (think TNT2) well. SC2 runs on modern-day mediocre cards or better, but lots of people [myself included] haven't bothered to buy new gaming machines.
Beta ran acceptably on my GeForce FX 5900. Got about 30 FPS provided I didn't hover over huge battles too long. Or play Protoss. Energy fields destroyed my FPS.
Quote from: rabbit on July 27, 2010, 04:43:12 pmBeta ran acceptably on my GeForce FX 5900. Got about 30 FPS provided I didn't hover over huge battles too long. Or play Protoss. Energy fields destroyed my FPS.And with how D3 looks it looks as though Activision is making Blizzard go graphics first and not appeal to its fanbase. SC1 was amazing because you could almost play it on what had the equivalent specs of a graphing calculator *just fine*. SC2 I may only download just for the story. It looks like they destroyed b.net from what I've heard.
There is no BNET. Think of a mixture of Facebook and XFire.