Author Topic: Who has met whom  (Read 32219 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #15 on: April 10, 2012, 04:22:53 pm »
Can someone plz PLZ fix the title of this thread so that it is grammatically correct ("Who has met whom")?????
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #16 on: April 10, 2012, 04:26:12 pm »
Can someone plz PLZ fix the title of this thread so that it is grammatically correct ("Who has met whom")?????

qq more Mr. Microsoft. Fixed!
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #17 on: April 12, 2012, 10:19:56 am »
Can someone plz PLZ fix the title of this thread so that it is grammatically correct ("Who has met whom")?????
finally. I saw that even the image filename was whometwho, also.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #18 on: April 12, 2012, 01:00:52 pm »
Can someone plz PLZ fix the title of this thread so that it is grammatically correct ("Who has met whom")?????
I'm not gonna lie.. that'd been bothering me every time I look at the thread. :)

Offline deadly7

  • 42
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6496
    • View Profile
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #19 on: April 12, 2012, 02:14:07 pm »
No guys the correct syntax is "Whom has met who". plz fix.
[17:42:21.609] <Ergot> Kutsuju you're girlfrieds pussy must be a 403 error for you
 [17:42:25.585] <Ergot> FORBIDDEN

on IRC playing T&T++
<iago> He is unarmed
<Hitmen> he has no arms?!

on AIM with a drunk mythix:
(00:50:05) Mythix: Deadly
(00:50:11) Mythix: I'm going to fuck that red dot out of your head.
(00:50:15) Mythix: with my nine

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #20 on: April 12, 2012, 02:23:08 pm »
No guys the correct syntax is "Whom has met who". plz fix.
liar

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #21 on: April 12, 2012, 02:49:13 pm »
Can someone plz PLZ fix the title of this thread so that it is grammatically correct ("Who has met whom")?????
I'm not gonna lie.. that'd been bothering me every time I look at the thread. :)

:D

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #22 on: April 12, 2012, 05:16:16 pm »
Can someone plz PLZ fix the title of this thread so that it is grammatically correct ("Who has met whom")?????
I'm not gonna lie.. that'd been bothering me every time I look at the thread. :)

:D
Muphry's Law!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_Law

Not to be confused with Murphy's law. :)

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #23 on: April 12, 2012, 05:17:18 pm »
ahah, that's excellent.

Offline Furious

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1833
  • I hate rabbits
    • View Profile
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #24 on: April 12, 2012, 05:21:58 pm »
Can someone plz PLZ fix the title of this thread so that it is grammatically correct ("Who has met whom")?????
I'm not gonna lie.. that'd been bothering me every time I look at the thread. :)

:D
Muphry's Law!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_Law

Not to be confused with Murphy's law. :)

Lol'd, the more you know!
Quote
[23:04:34] <deadly7[x86]> Newby[x86]
[23:04:35] <deadly7[x86]> YOU ARE AN EMO
[23:04:39] <Newby[x86]> shush it woman

Quote
[17:53:31] InsaneJoey[e2] was banned by x86 (GO EAT A BAG OF FUCK ASSHOLE (randomban)).

Quote from: Ergot
Put it this way Joe... you're on my Buddy List... if there's no one else on an you're the only one, I'd rather talk to myself.

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #25 on: April 12, 2012, 05:40:20 pm »

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #26 on: April 12, 2012, 06:18:19 pm »
Can someone plz PLZ fix the title of this thread so that it is grammatically correct ("Who has met whom")?????
I'm not gonna lie.. that'd been bothering me every time I look at the thread. :)

:D
Muphry's Law!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_Law

Not to be confused with Murphy's law. :)
I love quirky shit like this on the interwebs

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #27 on: April 12, 2012, 06:30:14 pm »
Well fuck me silly. I just tried to email Muphry's law wiki article to friends because we think shit like that is amusing. fuck me if I didn't send the Murphy's law wiki article.

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #28 on: April 13, 2012, 09:47:33 am »
Can someone plz PLZ fix the title of this thread so that it is grammatically correct ("Who has met whom")?????
I'm not gonna lie.. that'd been bothering me every time I look at the thread. :)

:D
Muphry's Law!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_Law

Not to be confused with Murphy's law. :)
Am I crazy or is "that'd" used properly there, but "look" should be "looked"?

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Re: Who has met whom
« Reply #29 on: April 13, 2012, 12:34:36 pm »
that had been bothering me every time I look at the thread.....

hmmm....yeah. that'd seems OK and look should be looked.

that has been bothering me every time I look at the thread

this thread?


........fuck english