Author Topic: x86-64  (Read 4882 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
x86-64
« on: July 08, 2005, 09:28:51 am »
So, who here has a 64-bit processor compudora, and what do you think of it? And what do you think of it, versus 32-bit? Or, if anyone has some good sites, you can just link me.  :)
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline RoMi

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • gg no re
    • View Profile
Re: x86-64
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2005, 09:38:09 am »
64 bit in noticeably the way of the future.  Having 64bit Windows on the other hand is more of a hassle, while 32bit programs run, 32bit drivers do not.  So good luck finding drivers especially to old pieces of hardware.  The only company that has extensive 64bit drivers are nVidia and ATI, and I thank them much for that, other then that HP doesn't yet for their printers (or at least my printer) and Dell doesn't for my Dell DJ.  64bit Antivirus's are hard to come by and the same goes with firewalls.  Avast 32bit does however work in 64bit Windows.  The only big advantage to it is the speed.  XP itself loads noticeably faster.  Give it a few more years and everybody will be all over the 64bit craze.
-RoMi

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: x86-64
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2005, 09:43:01 am »
Longhorn will change that when it's released, as it will require more CPU power, and is haled as a great 64bit OS, people will probably get 64bit processors (there is a 32bit version of Longhorn, but nobody cares).  For now, just go with a 64bit Linux Distro.

Offline RoMi

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • gg no re
    • View Profile
Re: x86-64
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2005, 09:46:08 am »
Yes, this could be a big time for Linux, since the drivers are native to the system (in most cases).
-RoMi

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: x86-64
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2005, 10:59:41 am »
Yes, this could be a big time for Linux, since the drivers are native to the system (in most cases).

But it won't be.  People can live with Win32 for now, and by the time 64-bit machines (x86-64 and IA64 both), Longhorn will be online.
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline RoMi

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • gg no re
    • View Profile
Re: x86-64
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2005, 11:07:25 am »
In the original timeline Longhorn was already supposed to be out.  Now they are saying Holiday season on 2006.
-RoMi

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: x86-64
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2005, 01:41:16 pm »
In the original timeline Longhorn was already supposed to be out.  Now they are saying Holiday season on 2006.

Having used the WinHEC 2004 build of Longhorn, we can all be glad that it's not out yet.  :)
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
Re: x86-64
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2005, 01:48:23 pm »
The newest WinHEC build is just Build 5048, which is accessible to anyone with a torrent subscription to a good site.
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: x86-64
« Reply #8 on: July 08, 2005, 06:22:04 pm »
My problem with Longhorn is that the requirements are rediculous.  My OS shouldn't have higher requirements than my software.

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: x86-64
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2005, 10:27:47 pm »
Windows is software :\

Offline Warrior

  • supreme mac daddy of trolls
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7503
  • One for a Dime two for a Quarter!
    • View Profile
Re: x86-64
« Reply #10 on: July 09, 2005, 01:38:12 am »
5048 features the glass theme which is AWESOME but it's pretty unstable now, atleast the 32bit version I tried.
The searching is FUCKING INCREDIBLE. God.
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Offline Quik

  • Webmaster Guy
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3262
  • \x51 \x75 \x69 \x6B \x5B \x78 \x38 \x36 \x5D
    • View Profile
Re: x86-64
« Reply #11 on: July 09, 2005, 03:14:28 am »
If you're smart, you'll dualboot 32bit and 64bit Windows for the time being, maybe even have Longhorn in there as well. I took a look at it, didn't look like much of a big deal to me. Oh well.
Quote
[20:21:13] xar: i was just thinking about the time iago came over here and we made this huge bomb and light up the sky for 6 min
[20:21:15] xar: that was funny