Happy New Year! Yes, the current one, not a previous one; this is a new post, we swear!
0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 08:24:52 pmYour definition of a "real FPS" is shit. And considering Krazed plays 1.6, you can't exactly challenge him. It's the only game on the Steam network I enjoy playing. You'll get over it.xterm > *
Your definition of a "real FPS" is shit. And considering Krazed plays 1.6, you can't exactly challenge him.
Quote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 08:52:46 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 08:24:52 pmYour definition of a "real FPS" is shit. And considering Krazed plays 1.6, you can't exactly challenge him. It's the only game on the Steam network I enjoy playing. You'll get over it.xterm > *Still gives you no right to judge what a "real FPS" is. You'll get over it.
[20:21:13] xar: i was just thinking about the time iago came over here and we made this huge bomb and light up the sky for 6 min[20:21:15] xar: that was funny
I'd personally do as Joe suggests
You might be right about that, Joe.
Quote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 11:06:43 pmQuote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 08:52:46 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 08:24:52 pmYour definition of a "real FPS" is shit. And considering Krazed plays 1.6, you can't exactly challenge him. It's the only game on the Steam network I enjoy playing. You'll get over it.xterm > *Still gives you no right to judge what a "real FPS" is. You'll get over it.And someone gives YOU the right? I was stating my opinion, same as you stating your opinion of my opinion.I have administrative priviledges on this board, which means I can state my opinion. You're lucky this board allows you to state yours, as well.
If you haven't caught on yet, xterm is a linux command line.. shell.. thing. Yeah!EDIT -I call krazed:Kripple, the bad habbit!
Quote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 11:10:23 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 11:06:43 pmQuote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 08:52:46 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 08:24:52 pmYour definition of a "real FPS" is shit. And considering Krazed plays 1.6, you can't exactly challenge him. It's the only game on the Steam network I enjoy playing. You'll get over it.xterm > *Still gives you no right to judge what a "real FPS" is. You'll get over it.And someone gives YOU the right? I was stating my opinion, same as you stating your opinion of my opinion.I have administrative priviledges on this board, which means I can state my opinion. You're lucky this board allows you to state yours, as well.Never said someone did, by definition the game is a FPS (First Person Shooter), so why are you arguing with me over something that you can't when? FACTS are against you.
Quote from: Scr33n0r on September 07, 2005, 02:31:33 amQuote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 11:10:23 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 11:06:43 pmQuote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 08:52:46 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 08:24:52 pmYour definition of a "real FPS" is shit. And considering Krazed plays 1.6, you can't exactly challenge him. It's the only game on the Steam network I enjoy playing. You'll get over it.xterm > *Still gives you no right to judge what a "real FPS" is. You'll get over it.And someone gives YOU the right? I was stating my opinion, same as you stating your opinion of my opinion.I have administrative priviledges on this board, which means I can state my opinion. You're lucky this board allows you to state yours, as well.Never said someone did, by definition the game is a FPS (First Person Shooter), so why are you arguing with me over something that you can't when? FACTS are against you.My definition provides that the only quality FPS games are the ones I like. Essentially, Counter-Strike: Source.
Quote from: Quik on September 07, 2005, 07:08:48 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 07, 2005, 02:31:33 amQuote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 11:10:23 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 11:06:43 pmQuote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 08:52:46 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 08:24:52 pmYour definition of a "real FPS" is shit. And considering Krazed plays 1.6, you can't exactly challenge him. It's the only game on the Steam network I enjoy playing. You'll get over it.xterm > *Still gives you no right to judge what a "real FPS" is. You'll get over it.And someone gives YOU the right? I was stating my opinion, same as you stating your opinion of my opinion.I have administrative priviledges on this board, which means I can state my opinion. You're lucky this board allows you to state yours, as well.Never said someone did, by definition the game is a FPS (First Person Shooter), so why are you arguing with me over something that you can't when? FACTS are against you.My definition provides that the only quality FPS games are the ones I like. Essentially, Counter-Strike: Source.Not what you originally said, k? k.
Quote from: Scr33n0r on September 07, 2005, 07:50:18 pmQuote from: Quik on September 07, 2005, 07:08:48 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 07, 2005, 02:31:33 amQuote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 11:10:23 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 11:06:43 pmQuote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 08:52:46 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 08:24:52 pmYour definition of a "real FPS" is shit. And considering Krazed plays 1.6, you can't exactly challenge him. It's the only game on the Steam network I enjoy playing. You'll get over it.xterm > *Still gives you no right to judge what a "real FPS" is. You'll get over it.And someone gives YOU the right? I was stating my opinion, same as you stating your opinion of my opinion.I have administrative priviledges on this board, which means I can state my opinion. You're lucky this board allows you to state yours, as well.Never said someone did, by definition the game is a FPS (First Person Shooter), so why are you arguing with me over something that you can't when? FACTS are against you.My definition provides that the only quality FPS games are the ones I like. Essentially, Counter-Strike: Source.Not what you originally said, k? k.Yeah, it pretty much is. I define "real" games as ones I like. Sorry if you like shitty games.
The majority of gamers would actually choose 1.6 over Source, it can be found on nearly any CS related gaming site.
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby[17:32:58] <xar> new rule[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 amI'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.That analogy doesn't even make sense. Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT.
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.
Quote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 11:10:23 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 11:06:43 pmQuote from: Quik on September 06, 2005, 08:52:46 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on September 06, 2005, 08:24:52 pmYour definition of a "real FPS" is shit. And considering Krazed plays 1.6, you can't exactly challenge him. It's the only game on the Steam network I enjoy playing. You'll get over it.xterm > *Still gives you no right to judge what a "real FPS" is. You'll get over it.And someone gives YOU the right? I was stating my opinion, same as you stating your opinion of my opinion.I have administrative priviledges on this board, which means I can state my opinion. You're lucky this board allows you to state yours, as well.Shh, saying power-trippy things like that is what Joe gets himself in trouble for :-P
stop ruining my thread!