Facebook killed the radio star. And by radio star, I mean the premise of distributed forums around the internet. And that got got by Instagram/SnapChat. And that got got by TikTok. Where the fuck is the internet we once knew?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby[17:32:58] <xar> new rule[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 amI'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.That analogy doesn't even make sense. Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT.
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.
You could make the chick be a "Hue" (or "Saturation" , not sure which one gray-scale's it) layer in Photoshop instead of messing the render up with odd brushing. Otherwise, looks all right.
Quote from: deadly7 on September 14, 2005, 06:54:12 pmYou could make the chick be a "Hue" (or "Saturation" , not sure which one gray-scale's it) layer in Photoshop instead of messing the render up with odd brushing. Otherwise, looks all right.Custom brushing looks so much better and detailed then hueing it, as long as you can pinpoint the lightspots and what features you want to enhance on the photo.
Quote from: Mythix on September 15, 2005, 02:36:01 amQuote from: deadly7 on September 14, 2005, 06:54:12 pmYou could make the chick be a "Hue" (or "Saturation" , not sure which one gray-scale's it) layer in Photoshop instead of messing the render up with odd brushing. Otherwise, looks all right.Custom brushing looks so much better and detailed then hueing it, as long as you can pinpoint the lightspots and what features you want to enhance on the photo.Yes, but that picture just looks wayy too off.
oh wow, that is one messed up render then. :O