Author Topic: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan  (Read 11588 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Screenor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1611
  • My own little world.
    • View Profile
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #15 on: September 14, 2005, 06:18:26 am »
He doesn't have "full control" he can't just wake up one morning and be like "lets nuke France, they stink."
Rofl, I can't read this topic anymore, too funny.

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #16 on: September 14, 2005, 07:18:21 am »
(1) We have the people like Green Day, or the people who blamed Katrina on the president, (aka, the liberals), who will cause huge arguements over this, giving the US even worse of a reputation.
Yes, let's blame the liberals for the moral and ethical decay of the country.  That's a genius idea.  Also, let's include in that that liberals aren't a real group of people, because they aren't republican, and should be purged.  Once all non-republicans are purged, we will have a country with a supreme ruler who we can re-elect Bush over and over for life.

Offline Screenor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1611
  • My own little world.
    • View Profile
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #17 on: September 14, 2005, 08:39:22 am »
(1) We have the people like Green Day, or the people who blamed Katrina on the president, (aka, the liberals), who will cause huge arguements over this, giving the US even worse of a reputation.
Yes, let's blame the liberals for the moral and ethical decay of the country.  That's a genius idea.  Also, let's include in that that liberals aren't a real group of people, because they aren't republican, and should be purged.  Once all non-republicans are purged, we will have a country with a supreme ruler who we can re-elect Bush over and over for life.
Sure, I'm in.

trust

  • Guest
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #18 on: September 14, 2005, 02:32:13 pm »
(1) We have the people like Green Day, or the people who blamed Katrina on the president, (aka, the liberals), who will cause huge arguements over this, giving the US even worse of a reputation.
Yes, let's blame the liberals for the moral and ethical decay of the country.  That's a genius idea.  Also, let's include in that that liberals aren't a real group of people, because they aren't republican, and should be purged.  Once all non-republicans are purged, we will have a country with a supreme ruler who we can re-elect Bush over and over for life.

That's a great idea, why aren't you making the domestic policy decisions? I'd vote for you if you had that agenda.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2005, 02:43:49 pm »
He doesn't have "full control" he can't just wake up one morning and be like "lets nuke France, they stink."

No, he wouldn't do that, they don't have oil ;-)

trust

  • Guest
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #20 on: September 14, 2005, 02:47:33 pm »
He doesn't have "full control" he can't just wake up one morning and be like "lets nuke France, they stink."

No, he wouldn't do that, they don't have oil ;-)

Actually, France (and Russia) were the two countries who had the majority of companies that were signing deals with the UN Oil-For-Food program in order to access the Iraqi oil fields.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #21 on: September 14, 2005, 03:24:12 pm »
He doesn't have "full control" he can't just wake up one morning and be like "lets nuke France, they stink."

No, he wouldn't do that, they don't have oil ;-)

Actually, France (and Russia) were the two countries who had the majority of companies that were signing deals with the UN Oil-For-Food program in order to access the Iraqi oil fields.

Exactly, they don't have oil!  Why would the US bother attacking them? There's no benefit to the (current) president :)

trust

  • Guest
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #22 on: September 14, 2005, 03:26:13 pm »
Because they're annoying.

Offline RoMi

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • gg no re
    • View Profile
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #23 on: September 14, 2005, 03:36:49 pm »
Your right iago, we should go after canada's oil!
-RoMi

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #24 on: September 14, 2005, 03:43:57 pm »
Your right iago, we should go after canada's oil!

Exactly!

And many Canadians are convinced that you will, at some point. 

Offline Screenor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1611
  • My own little world.
    • View Profile
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #25 on: September 14, 2005, 05:59:35 pm »
Not unless your people do the next 9/11, and years before bomb our navel (sp) ships.

trust

  • Guest
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #26 on: September 14, 2005, 06:04:50 pm »
I think we should enslave Canada. They do nothing but complain.

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #27 on: September 14, 2005, 06:40:20 pm »
Ryan Marcus, I am disappointed that you haven't so much as responded in any way to my thorough dismemberment of your argument.  I'd like to continue this debate.

Or as they say in Red vs Blue (I'm an addict):
Quote
Church: You deserve to DIE!  Die, and go to hell and burn!
Sarge: Oh yeah!?  Well I hope you get raped!  Twice!  Maybe then you'll feel different!  Jerk!
Grif: We don't need to find any weapons of mass destruction!  We just need to want to find 'em.  That's the way it works!
Simmons: I voted for Nader!  I hate everyone!

Exactly, they don't have oil!  Why would the US bother attacking them? There's no benefit to the (current) president :)
Yes, particularly politically, it was a large benefit to go after Iraq for their extensively tiny oil supply.  I can't believe that the "war for oil" argument still goes.

And many Canadians are convinced that you will, at some point. 
That'll be the day.
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #28 on: September 14, 2005, 06:52:09 pm »
Not unless your people do the next 9/11, and years before bomb our navel (sp) ships.

Just like Iraq did?

trust

  • Guest
Re: Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
« Reply #29 on: September 14, 2005, 07:04:09 pm »
Not unless your people do the next 9/11, and years before bomb our navel (sp) ships.

Just like Iraq did?

They paid for it.