Facebook killed the radio star. And by radio star, I mean the premise of distributed forums around the internet. And that got got by Instagram/SnapChat. And that got got by TikTok. Where the fuck is the internet we once knew?
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: iago on December 04, 2005, 10:23:04 pmNono, you misunderstand. www.javaop.com/~iago/test.php.anythingNevermind the warning, I used my Rabbit-friendly program to test Oh, hahaha.That's actually pretty nice to know. Upload scripts should always have a list of allowed extensions, not a list of banned ones.http://sidoh.org/test.php.iz3nything
Nono, you misunderstand. www.javaop.com/~iago/test.php.anythingNevermind the warning, I used my Rabbit-friendly program to test
A list of allowed extensions can be circumvented in this case. For example, if programming languages were allowed, they could have uploaded:http://www.javaop.com/~iago/test.php.chttp://www.javaop.com/~iago/test.php.javahttp://www.javaop.com/~iago/test.php.cppThat would not have been cool. You have to either:a) rename the file completeb) remove php from the inside, which leaves me wondering what else can be run like that.. I wonder if this is widely known, or if I should bring this up on a mailing list...
Quote from: iago on December 04, 2005, 11:02:36 pmA list of allowed extensions can be circumvented in this case. For example, if programming languages were allowed, they could have uploaded:http://www.javaop.com/~iago/test.php.chttp://www.javaop.com/~iago/test.php.javahttp://www.javaop.com/~iago/test.php.cppThat would not have been cool. You have to either:a) rename the file completeb) remove php from the inside, which leaves me wondering what else can be run like that.. I wonder if this is widely known, or if I should bring this up on a mailing list...I don't know, but that should not be the default setting of Apache by any means.I found another one:.sql
.rar, too. There's a lot of them...
Quote from: Quik on December 04, 2005, 10:42:55 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on December 04, 2005, 10:36:47 pmQuote from: iago on December 04, 2005, 09:51:05 pmQuote from: Ergot on December 04, 2005, 09:22:34 pmWhat was "hacked"? I was cleaning gutters :/ ? I never noticed a change before 1:15 (when I started)I replaced the forum with a textfile saying, "pwned fags"Oh that was you? Here I was thinking Hitmen came back and did it again.Sounds like you missed it, so here it is again: Hitman cannot gain unauthorized access to any remote computers. He never had a part in this except being used as a scapegoat and playing along.Ok, so technically by what you're saying, he took part in it, however, didn't actually hack the forum. (?)
Quote from: Scr33n0r on December 04, 2005, 10:36:47 pmQuote from: iago on December 04, 2005, 09:51:05 pmQuote from: Ergot on December 04, 2005, 09:22:34 pmWhat was "hacked"? I was cleaning gutters :/ ? I never noticed a change before 1:15 (when I started)I replaced the forum with a textfile saying, "pwned fags"Oh that was you? Here I was thinking Hitmen came back and did it again.Sounds like you missed it, so here it is again: Hitman cannot gain unauthorized access to any remote computers. He never had a part in this except being used as a scapegoat and playing along.
Quote from: iago on December 04, 2005, 09:51:05 pmQuote from: Ergot on December 04, 2005, 09:22:34 pmWhat was "hacked"? I was cleaning gutters :/ ? I never noticed a change before 1:15 (when I started)I replaced the forum with a textfile saying, "pwned fags"Oh that was you? Here I was thinking Hitmen came back and did it again.
Quote from: Ergot on December 04, 2005, 09:22:34 pmWhat was "hacked"? I was cleaning gutters :/ ? I never noticed a change before 1:15 (when I started)I replaced the forum with a textfile saying, "pwned fags"
What was "hacked"? I was cleaning gutters :/ ? I never noticed a change before 1:15 (when I started)
[20:21:13] xar: i was just thinking about the time iago came over here and we made this huge bomb and light up the sky for 6 min[20:21:15] xar: that was funny
Quote from: Scr33n0r on December 04, 2005, 10:46:43 pmQuote from: Quik on December 04, 2005, 10:42:55 pmQuote from: Scr33n0r on December 04, 2005, 10:36:47 pmQuote from: iago on December 04, 2005, 09:51:05 pmQuote from: Ergot on December 04, 2005, 09:22:34 pmWhat was "hacked"? I was cleaning gutters :/ ? I never noticed a change before 1:15 (when I started)I replaced the forum with a textfile saying, "pwned fags"Oh that was you? Here I was thinking Hitmen came back and did it again.Sounds like you missed it, so here it is again: Hitman cannot gain unauthorized access to any remote computers. He never had a part in this except being used as a scapegoat and playing along.Ok, so technically by what you're saying, he took part in it, however, didn't actually hack the forum. (?)There was no hacking of the forum, and Hitmen didn't take part in it. It was a joke (see the current news) and Hitmen was just informed, he didn't do anything except watch.
(22:15:39) Newby: it hurts to swallow
I wasn't 'informed', I just happened to figure it out and people didn't want me ruining it. I'm rather good at analyzing people's writing and can usually tell when someone who I've talked to a lot online isn't telling the truth, because the writing just doesn't look like how the person normally writes. iago in particular I picked up on easy and he could tell I did and made me shut up so I didn't ruin it. Newby's was also easy to tell, but I don't really know myndfyre so couldn't tell there or not. And lies!!!! I did take part. Blaming it on me was my idea, since I knew I was the only one who knew, other than the leader people.
[23:04:34] <deadly7[x86]> Newby[x86][23:04:35] <deadly7[x86]> YOU ARE AN EMO[23:04:39] <Newby[x86]> shush it woman
[17:53:31] InsaneJoey[e2] was banned by x86 (GO EAT A BAG OF FUCK ASSHOLE (randomban)).
Put it this way Joe... you're on my Buddy List... if there's no one else on an you're the only one, I'd rather talk to myself.
Notice: Use of undefined constant friendly - assumed 'friendly' in /www/hosts/iago.no-ip.com/web/test.php.anything on line 2I told you, iago. It had to assume that the friendly constant had a value of "friendly".