Author Topic: MP3 Degrader?  (Read 11306 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: MP3 Degrader?
« Reply #15 on: December 08, 2005, 10:18:11 pm »
I ripped an entire Ludacris album to about 14MB. The loss of quality was noticable, but it wasn't horrible.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Ergot

  • 吴立峰 ^_^ !
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
  • I steal bandwidth. p_o
    • View Profile
Re: MP3 Degrader?
« Reply #16 on: December 08, 2005, 10:21:50 pm »
I used winlame. It worked nice. I just used lame now... I can fit about 18 songs on my shitty 64 mb mp3 player.

So on 16, you might get 4.  Unless you encode them at like, 16kbps or something, so they only actually have like 4 tones. :)
I've gone as low a 96 kbps without realizing much of a difference, any lower sounds like poopie :P
Who gives a damn? I fuck sheep all the time.
And yes, male both ends.  There are a couple lesbians that need a two-ended dildo...My router just refuses to wear a strap-on.
(05:55:03) JoE ThE oDD: omfg good job i got a boner thinkin bout them chinese bitches
(17:54:15) Sidoh: I love cosmetology

Offline Hitmen

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1913
    • View Profile
Re: MP3 Degrader?
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2005, 10:29:17 am »
I ripped an entire Ludacris album to about 14MB. The loss of quality was noticable, but it wasn't horrible.
Yeah, but in order for quality loss to matter much you need to try it with actual music.
Quote
(22:15:39) Newby: it hurts to swallow

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: MP3 Degrader?
« Reply #18 on: December 10, 2005, 12:42:55 am »
I ripped an entire Ludacris album to about 14MB. The loss of quality was noticable, but it wasn't horrible.
Yeah, but in order for quality loss to matter much you need to try it with actual music.
LOL.

I love your personal text, "banned".

Anyhow, I've got 8 Jesus songs (plus Simple Plan - Untitled), encoded at 96kbps.

EDIT -
Untitled pushed it over the edge a tiny bit. I've got 944kb left! Mad skills.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2005, 12:48:57 am by Joe[e2] »
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: MP3 Degrader?
« Reply #19 on: December 10, 2005, 01:49:11 pm »
plus Simple Plan - Untitled

Damn emo.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: MP3 Degrader?
« Reply #20 on: December 10, 2005, 01:50:12 pm »
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT.