« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Battle.net Instant Messenger!  (Read 18991 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Quik

  • Webmaster Guy
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3262
  • \x51 \x75 \x69 \x6B \x5B \x78 \x38 \x36 \x5D
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #30 on: January 05, 2006, 12:54:52 am »
Quote from: iago on January 05, 2006, 12:17:35 am
Quote from: Sidoh on January 04, 2006, 11:49:27 pm
Quote from: Joe[e2] on January 04, 2006, 10:47:37 pm
Did you read my post? I said that it had a single location, not a single server. Ugh.

I really don't think it's in a single location anyway.  And even if this is true, why does it really matter?  In all the years of my life, I've had the internet backbone for my state go down... once, I think.  And they fixed it within an hour.  That was only for government buildings, too.

What if there was a large-scale war that Blizzard survived and AOL didn't? :P

If they both started DDoSing eachother, AOL would win because of all their dronescustomers.
Logged
Quote
[20:21:13] xar: i was just thinking about the time iago came over here and we made this huge bomb and light up the sky for 6 min
[20:21:15] xar: that was funny

Offline Ergot

  • 吴立峰 ^_^ !
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
  • I steal bandwidth. p_o
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #31 on: January 05, 2006, 12:56:27 am »
But Blizzard has all those Koreans.
Logged
Quote from: Newby on February 26, 2006, 12:16:58 am
Who gives a damn? I fuck sheep all the time.
Quote from: rabbit on December 11, 2005, 01:05:35 pm
And yes, male both ends.  There are a couple lesbians that need a two-ended dildo...My router just refuses to wear a strap-on.
(05:55:03) JoE ThE oDD: omfg good job i got a boner thinkin bout them chinese bitches
(17:54:15) Sidoh: I love cosmetology

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #32 on: January 05, 2006, 01:12:49 am »
Quote from: iago on January 05, 2006, 12:17:35 am
What if there was a large-scale war that Blizzard survived and AOL didn't? :P

I think the status of Instant Messaging servers would be one of the last concerns if a whole section of California was bombed.  I'm pretty sure they're not that centralized anyway.
Logged

Offline Blaze

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7136
  • Canadian
    • View Profile
    • Maide
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #33 on: January 05, 2006, 03:34:18 am »
If aol went out, people would just use another real IM service. :)
Logged
And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #34 on: January 05, 2006, 08:00:54 am »
Like.. this..
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

Offline Furious

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1833
  • I hate rabbits
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #35 on: January 05, 2006, 10:49:12 am »
Is this something you plan on implementing in Revelation Bot?

Wow, I wasn't really thinking when I posted that. Good luck! I'd be willing to beta it if you get it done. :D
Logged
Quote
[23:04:34] <deadly7[x86]> Newby[x86]
[23:04:35] <deadly7[x86]> YOU ARE AN EMO
[23:04:39] <Newby[x86]> shush it woman

Quote
[17:53:31] InsaneJoey[e2] was banned by x86 (GO EAT A BAG OF FUCK ASSHOLE (randomban)).

Quote from: Ergot
Put it this way Joe... you're on my Buddy List... if there's no one else on an you're the only one, I'd rather talk to myself.

Offline Newby

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #36 on: January 05, 2006, 05:47:17 pm »
Insane idea: make a Gaim plugin for Battle.net!

Do it Joe! It would be something I would appreciate and it wouldn't be a stupid idea.

EDIT -- I fail to see why this was locked and no one has said anything about it, so it remains unlocked for the time being.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2006, 06:30:04 pm by Newby »
Logged
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 pm
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 am
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #37 on: January 05, 2006, 06:45:16 pm »
* unTactical thinks newby didn't read unTactical's earlier post
Logged

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #38 on: January 05, 2006, 06:48:42 pm »
Quote from: unTactical on January 05, 2006, 06:45:16 pm
* unTactical thinks newby didn't read unTactical's earlier post

I was thinking that too.
Logged

Offline Newby

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #39 on: January 05, 2006, 06:50:50 pm »
Quote from: unTactical on January 05, 2006, 06:45:16 pm
* unTactical thinks newby didn't read unTactical's earlier post

I talked with iago about that plugin a while ago, and if I recall correctly, that just logs in on the telnet/CHAT protocol. Not as a binary client.
Logged
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 pm
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 am
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #40 on: January 05, 2006, 06:54:14 pm »
touché salesman, touché

I was more referring to the fact that I had already discussed the idea, so it's not all that "Insane" for you to mention it ;)
Logged

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #41 on: January 05, 2006, 06:54:57 pm »
Quote from: unTactical on January 05, 2006, 06:54:14 pm
touché salesman, touché

I was more referring to the fact that I had already discussed the idea, so it's not all that "Insane" for you to mention it ;)

ROFL.  Volcano insurance!
Logged

Offline Newby

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #42 on: January 05, 2006, 07:10:46 pm »
Quote from: unTactical on January 05, 2006, 06:54:14 pm
I was more referring to the fact that I had already discussed the idea

You didn't discuss the idea of writing a Gaim Binary Battle.net client! You discussed the idea of an already existing plugin, whether it was for a base or not!

Aha! :)
Logged
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 pm
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 am
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #43 on: January 05, 2006, 07:41:44 pm »
Since someone didn't understand it from before, this thread is locked.
Logged
Quote from: Joe on January 23, 2011, 11:47:54 pm
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Quote from: Rule on May 26, 2009, 02:02:12 pm
Our species really annoys me.

Offline Newby

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: Battle.net Instant Messenger!
« Reply #44 on: January 05, 2006, 07:48:07 pm »
Quote from: MyndFyre[x86] on January 05, 2006, 07:41:44 pm
Since someone didn't understand it from before, this thread is locked.

Quote from: Newby on January 05, 2006, 05:47:17 pm
EDIT -- I fail to see why this was locked and no one has said anything about it, so it remains unlocked for the time being.

Any particular reason? =P
Logged
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 pm
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 am
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  All   Go Up
« previous next »