Author Topic: Dinosaurs! (Read 12194 times)

iago · « **on:** January 16, 2006, 10:46:49 pm »

Stolen from the vL forum: What is your favorite dinosaur (or prehistoric reptile), and why?

My favorite dinosaur is the Anklyosaurus, because it's 10 meters and 4.5 tons and armor plated. It's the biggest armored dinosaur ever.

My second-favorite would be the Compsognathus because those tiny little buggers killed the old professor guy (with poison) in Jurassic Park (the book, the movie wasn't quite so cool).

Ergot · « **Reply #1 on:** January 16, 2006, 10:52:08 pm »

Well... I don't really have a favorite dinosaur.

I'd pick Barney because he's purple and gay.

Blaze · « **Reply #2 on:** January 16, 2006, 11:27:12 pm »

The one that killed Nedry in JP. Hehe, he got owned pretty bad.

ZeroX · « **Reply #3 on:** January 18, 2006, 09:56:29 pm »

Quote from: Ergot on January 16, 2006, 10:52:08 pm

Well... I don't really have a favorite dinosaur.

I'd pick Barney because he's purple and gay.

DUDE OWNED.

Joe · « **Reply #4 on:** January 18, 2006, 10:16:00 pm »

My favorite dinosaur is iago. Er.. he's dinosauric in age and size, k? <3.

Hitmen · « **Reply #5 on:** January 18, 2006, 11:02:39 pm »

Not huge on dinosaurs, but I would have to say <3Architeuthis

Mythix · « **Reply #6 on:** January 19, 2006, 01:31:50 am »

Raptors, because they taste funny.

Newby · « **Reply #7 on:** January 19, 2006, 09:15:40 am »

Quote from: Hitmen on January 18, 2006, 11:02:39 pm

Not huge on dinosaurs, but I would have to say <3Architeuthis

<3 Engorged.

GameSnake · « **Reply #8 on:** January 19, 2006, 03:01:01 pm »

Yeah but they all died by a big explosion, thank god.

Chavo · « **Reply #9 on:** January 19, 2006, 03:08:59 pm »

Quote from: GameSnake on January 19, 2006, 03:01:01 pm

Yeah but they all died by a big explosion, thank god.

Didn't you hear? the "extinction" of the dinosaurs is just a massive government cover up so that they can do stem cell research with dinosaur embryos.

GameSnake · « **Reply #10 on:** January 19, 2006, 03:26:42 pm »

Yeah, next thing is you'll tell me our rights are slipping by day by day, but thats just dangerous thinking isnt it?

leet_muffin · « **Reply #11 on:** January 21, 2006, 03:44:56 am »

Quote from: Newby on January 19, 2006, 09:15:40 am

Quote from: Hitmen on January 18, 2006, 11:02:39 pm
Not huge on dinosaurs, but I would have to say <3Architeuthis

<3 Engorged.

I'm Dan, and I approve this message.

Joe · « **Reply #12 on:** January 24, 2006, 08:42:09 pm »

Dinosaurs don't exist, nor did they ever. Those bones are really from Goliath's family.

iago · « **Reply #13 on:** January 24, 2006, 09:27:24 pm »

The bones still form into animals that once existed (unless they were planted by God or something...), and the animals have been given names (as Dinosaurs). I don't really think there's much room to dispute the existance of dinosaurs as never having happened, is there? I won't force you to believe that they existed 65,000,000 years ago, but you ought to admit they existed in some form.

And, if they existed in some form, which one do you think is the best?

leet_muffin · « **Reply #14 on:** January 24, 2006, 11:13:46 pm »

Quote from: Joe on January 24, 2006, 08:42:09 pm

Dinosaurs don't exist, nor did they ever. Those bones are really from Goliath's family.

Yeah, agreed. And man has never been to the moon. Don't forget that 9/11 was an attack by the US government, or that the World Health Organization created AIDS in order to wipe out Africa. Also, the Holocaust never happened.

Sidoh · « **Reply #15 on:** January 24, 2006, 11:15:44 pm »

Quote from: leet_muffin on January 24, 2006, 11:13:46 pm

Also, the Holocaust never happened.

No, the general perception of the Holocaust is a conspiracy. Everyone knows Hitler was a good buddy with the US government. The US was 100% behind him.

iago · « **Reply #16 on:** January 24, 2006, 11:37:03 pm »

Jesus Dan, you're an idiot!

Quote from: leet_muffin on January 24, 2006, 11:13:46 pm

....the World Health Organization created AIDS in order to wipe out Africa....

It was to wipe out gays, not Africans, duh!!

Blaze · « **Reply #17 on:** January 24, 2006, 11:44:20 pm »

Also, the American and Russian Governments are controlling the weather by shooting lasers at clouds.

leet_muffin · « **Reply #18 on:** January 25, 2006, 12:15:47 am »

Quote from: iago on January 24, 2006, 11:37:03 pm

Jesus Dan, you're an idiot!

Quote from: leet_muffin on January 24, 2006, 11:13:46 pm
....the World Health Organization created AIDS in order to wipe out Africa....

It was to wipe out gays, not Africans, duh!!

I hope you are kidding, how are gays any more at risk to STDs? Isn't it still a membrane touching a membrane?

Actually, that would mean that through hereditary STDs, straight couples who have children are more-so spreaders of STDs.

Since I'm not sure if you're kidding, the conspiracy is that the WHO put AIDS into Africa to wipe them out.

Sidoh · « **Reply #19 on:** January 25, 2006, 12:18:08 am »

I think it's a lot less common for gays to use protection.

iago · « **Reply #20 on:** January 25, 2006, 09:31:21 am »

Quote from: leet_muffin on January 25, 2006, 12:15:47 am

Quote from: iago on January 24, 2006, 11:37:03 pm
Jesus Dan, you're an idiot!

Quote from: leet_muffin on January 24, 2006, 11:13:46 pm
....the World Health Organization created AIDS in order to wipe out Africa....

It was to wipe out gays, not Africans, duh!!

I hope you are kidding, how are gays any more at risk to STDs? Isn't it still a membrane touching a membrane?

Actually, that would mean that through hereditary STDs, straight couples who have children are more-so spreaders of STDs.

Since I'm not sure if you're kidding, the conspiracy is that the WHO put AIDS into Africa to wipe them out.

I AM kidding, I like to think that AIDS was started by accident.

But in any case, when it was first around, the gay population was much harder hit than the straight population. This is probably the result of, like Sidoh said, not using protection. Straight couples would use protection anyways, because they don't want to have a baby, but gay people wouldn't have the problem.

MyndFyre · « **Reply #21 on:** January 25, 2006, 10:56:49 am »

Quote from: Joe on January 24, 2006, 08:42:09 pm

Dinosaurs don't exist, nor did they ever. Those bones are really from Goliath's family.

Actually Joe, there are a lot of Christians who say that dinosaur fossilization supports the notion of a catastrophic flood which was recent and supportive of the story from Genesis. (I can't find the website of the guy I wanted to cite, but that story looks pretty good for now). Also, don't just dismiss the universe as "not old." God created Adam old, didn't he? Who's to say that creating already-dead animals wasn't a way to keep soil nutrients available for the first generation of creatures to exist?

Just because you don't believe in evolution doesn't mean that dinosaurs didn't exist. I think you'd have to be a fool to ignore the evidence that's there. But the argument in support of the flash flood fossilization theory is pretty good -- at least, it's an alternative rival hypothesis that probably can't be proven false.

ZeroX · « **Reply #22 on:** January 25, 2006, 01:46:55 pm »

Quote from: MyndFyre[x86] on January 25, 2006, 10:56:49 am

Quote from: Joe on January 24, 2006, 08:42:09 pm
Dinosaurs don't exist, nor did they ever. Those bones are really from Goliath's family.

Actually Joe, there are a lot of Christians who say that dinosaur fossilization supports the notion of a catastrophic flood which was recent and supportive of the story from Genesis. (I can't find the website of the guy I wanted to cite, but that story looks pretty good for now). Also, don't just dismiss the universe as "not old." God created Adam old, didn't he? Who's to say that creating already-dead animals wasn't a way to keep soil nutrients available for the first generation of creatures to exist?

Just because you don't believe in evolution doesn't mean that dinosaurs didn't exist. I think you'd have to be a fool to ignore the evidence that's there. But the argument in support of the flash flood fossilization theory is pretty good -- at least, it's an alternative rival hypothesis that probably can't be proven false.

I cant stand most christans that pracite for this very reason. If a great flood that lasted for 40 days and 40 nights covering the earth, Killing everybody and everything. Besides a 400 year old man with 2 of everykind of animal, or how most christans say it "Every kind of animal that was around" So if all that were around where birds and insects, how do we have the type of animals today? Cross breeding? Cross breeding didnt start till the late 1800's when Gergor Mendal. But there were already millions and millions of types of birds, Spiders, dogs, ect....

MyndFyre · « **Reply #23 on:** January 25, 2006, 02:21:18 pm »

Quote from: ZeroX on January 25, 2006, 01:46:55 pm

I cant stand most christans that pracite for this very reason. If a great flood that lasted for 40 days and 40 nights covering the earth, Killing everybody and everything. Besides a 400 year old man with 2 of everykind of animal, or how most christans say it "Every kind of animal that was around" So if all that were around where birds and insects, how do we have the type of animals today? Cross breeding? Cross breeding didnt start till the late 1800's when Gergor Mendal. But there were already millions and millions of types of birds, Spiders, dogs, ect....

First of all, attack beliefs, not people.

Second, so what you're saying is, you can accept that there's a God who created all of the earth in 6 days, but what you CAN'T accept is that the earth repopulated after a lot of rain?

iago · « **Reply #24 on:** January 25, 2006, 03:06:07 pm »

Quote from: ZeroX on January 25, 2006, 01:46:55 pm

Quote from: MyndFyre[x86] on January 25, 2006, 10:56:49 am
Quote from: Joe on January 24, 2006, 08:42:09 pm
Dinosaurs don't exist, nor did they ever. Those bones are really from Goliath's family.

Actually Joe, there are a lot of Christians who say that dinosaur fossilization supports the notion of a catastrophic flood which was recent and supportive of the story from Genesis. (I can't find the website of the guy I wanted to cite, but that story looks pretty good for now). Also, don't just dismiss the universe as "not old." God created Adam old, didn't he? Who's to say that creating already-dead animals wasn't a way to keep soil nutrients available for the first generation of creatures to exist?

Just because you don't believe in evolution doesn't mean that dinosaurs didn't exist. I think you'd have to be a fool to ignore the evidence that's there. But the argument in support of the flash flood fossilization theory is pretty good -- at least, it's an alternative rival hypothesis that probably can't be proven false.

I cant stand most christans that pracite for this very reason. If a great flood that lasted for 40 days and 40 nights covering the earth, Killing everybody and everything. Besides a 400 year old man with 2 of everykind of animal, or how most christans say it "Every kind of animal that was around" So if all that were around where birds and insects, how do we have the type of animals today? Cross breeding? Cross breeding didnt start till the late 1800's when Gergor Mendal. But there were already millions and millions of types of birds, Spiders, dogs, ect....

I accept the story more as symbolic than as a true event. I know that others around here will disagree with that from both sides, but I'm sticking to it.

Blaze · « **Reply #25 on:** January 25, 2006, 03:45:29 pm »

Our forums suck, everything goes religious.

iago · « **Reply #26 on:** January 25, 2006, 07:30:31 pm »

Not really, just topics that border on religious issues. And this topic certainly does.

wires · « **Reply #27 on:** January 25, 2006, 09:29:09 pm »

Quote from: Joe on January 24, 2006, 08:42:09 pm

Dinosaurs don't exist, nor did they ever. Those bones are really from Goliath's family.

Wow, never heard that one before. The skulls that are left behind that are supposed to be dinosaurs, don't have any resemblence to a human skull. At least I don't think so.

deadly7 · « **Reply #28 on:** January 26, 2006, 07:44:02 pm »

Quote from: iago on January 25, 2006, 07:30:31 pm

Not really, just topics that border on religious issues. And this topic certainly does.

Blaze's topics don't! :p

Super_X · « **Reply #29 on:** January 27, 2006, 12:34:20 am »

About gays being more suseptobale to AIDs, I always thought that since suppositorys disolve into the body and circulation system faster than oraly, and other ways. Also, the stomache destroies all the things it can.

That's my take on it, at least.

Also, anal can tare.

iago · « **Reply #30 on:** January 27, 2006, 10:42:11 am »

Quote from: Super_X on January 27, 2006, 12:34:20 am

About gays being more suseptobale to AIDs, I always thought that since suppositorys disolve into the body and circulation system faster than oraly, and other ways. Also, the stomache destroies all the things it can.

That's my take on it, at least.

Also, anal can tare.

Unless you have an open cut in your mouth, there is no evidence that HIV can spread orally.

deadly7 · « **Reply #31 on:** January 27, 2006, 08:58:59 pm »

Quote from: iago on January 27, 2006, 10:42:11 am

Quote from: Super_X on January 27, 2006, 12:34:20 am
About gays being more suseptobale to AIDs, I always thought that since suppositorys disolve into the body and circulation system faster than oraly, and other ways. Also, the stomache destroies all the things it can.

That's my take on it, at least.

Also, anal can tare.

Unless you have an open cut in your mouth, there is no evidence that HIV can spread orally.

HIV spreads through bodily fluids, your tongue [being salivated] coming in contact with something else would put HIV on the thing you came in contact with.

Sidoh · « **Reply #32 on:** January 27, 2006, 09:37:59 pm »

Quote from: deadly7 on January 27, 2006, 08:58:59 pm

HIV spreads through bodily fluids, your tongue [being salivated] coming in contact with something else would put HIV on the thing you came in contact with.

From what I've learned, HIV doesn't have enough potency in saliva to be transmitted, especially considering the most likely area of transmission into the bloodstream is an ulcer in the stomach, which is really uncommon. Stomach Acid has a pH of 1-2, which doesn't exactly make for a comfortable environment for any type of organism--including a virus.

Towelie · « **Reply #33 on:** January 27, 2006, 11:17:51 pm »

Quote from: leet_muffin on January 21, 2006, 03:44:56 am

Quote from: Newby on January 19, 2006, 09:15:40 am
Quote from: Hitmen on January 18, 2006, 11:02:39 pm
Not huge on dinosaurs, but I would have to say <3Architeuthis

<3 Engorged.

I'm Dan, and I approve this message.

I second that!

Joe · « **Reply #34 on:** January 29, 2006, 09:45:02 pm »

Quote from: Towelie[x86] on January 27, 2006, 11:17:51 pm

Quote from: leet_muffin on January 21, 2006, 03:44:56 am
Quote from: Newby on January 19, 2006, 09:15:40 am
Quote from: Hitmen on January 18, 2006, 11:02:39 pm
Not huge on dinosaurs, but I would have to say <3Architeuthis

<3 Engorged.

I'm Dan, and I approve this message.
I second that!

Boo!

I'd like to toast Andy for pissing me off, a lot.

Oh, wait.. uh

As for AIDS and gays, I'd like to think God made AIDS to wipe out the gays, because homosexuality is a sin (Leviticus 18:22).

AntiVirus · « **Reply #35 on:** January 29, 2006, 10:03:13 pm »

Except there is one problem with that.. You don't have to be homosexual to contract AIDS.

deadly7 · « **Reply #36 on:** January 29, 2006, 10:57:35 pm »

In Joe's case you do.

Joe · « **Reply #37 on:** January 29, 2006, 11:06:12 pm »

Quote from: deadly7 on January 29, 2006, 10:57:35 pm

In Joe's case you do.

That was below the belt. Warn me next time.

deadly7 · « **Reply #38 on:** January 31, 2006, 12:00:14 am »

Quote from: Joe on January 29, 2006, 11:06:12 pm

Quote from: deadly7 on January 29, 2006, 10:57:35 pm
In Joe's case you do.

That was below the belt. Warn me next time.

[size=0]Warning: Below the belt[/size]
It's ok, you have nothing below the belt anyways.

Joe · « **Reply #39 on:** January 31, 2006, 05:07:13 pm »

That wasn't below the belt, deadly, that was just weak.

ZeroX · « **Reply #40 on:** January 31, 2006, 06:32:31 pm »

Quote from: Joe on January 31, 2006, 05:07:13 pm

That wasn't below the belt, deadly, that was just weak.

warning

So was your mom's sex.

deadly7 · « **Reply #41 on:** January 31, 2006, 09:06:27 pm »

Quote from: Joe on January 31, 2006, 05:07:13 pm

That wasn't below the belt, deadly, that was just weak.

It's ok, go ahead and be like Mr. Smithers and buy more estrogen for a "friend."

News:

Author Topic: Dinosaurs! (Read 12194 times)