THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS, if he [bush] can by pass amendants and privacy laws, that is break a law on this serious of a scale, than how come people got thier panties in a bunch when Clinton got his dick sucked, which is might I add not nescarlly illegal? Clinton was a 2-time elected president too, you know.
He did not pass an amendment. That requires 33 of the 50 states.
People didn't get their panties in a bunch because Clinton got a blow job.
People got their panties in a bunch because Clinton got a blow job, then he
went on national television and proclaimed he didn't get a blow job directly to the American people explicitly about that incident, then he
went to court and lied under oath (committed perjury) about getting a blow job.
Bush has not given me reason to doubt his honesty, nor has anyone else provided sufficient evidence that Bush has ever lied to me directly on national TV or while under oath.
Furthermore, as I said, it's been said that the FISA court (the court that would have jurisdiction in this matter) not only said that Bush legally did this surveillance, but also to not do so would have been a serious breach of his constitutional responsibility.