Let's see here, first it's been shown that google uses gzip to compress
it's webpages. That can account for most of it's speedy results along with indexed.
... That's HTTP compressing; it saves bandwidth, not speed. I think the "time" saved would be minuscule, since it has to compress the
results (that's right, it's already done its searching/sorting, this compressing is after-the-fact). That takes
timeThey don't use SQL to order by relevance, they use a technology they developed called "PigeonRank" or something along those lines to order the data returned in an SQL fashion, I'm not saying they use a public solution. I'm saying whatever solution they have developed is based on the same underlying principals.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AT THE PIGEON RANK AHAHAHAH. Warrior, perhaps you should check this out:
http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.htmlFeel dumb? Good, you should.
Of course it uses the same underlying principals. They fetch some results from a database, sort them and show them to you. My point is
they do it faster with more results than anyone on the market.
"Google indexes pages on the Web by using what are commonly known as "spiders", "crawlers", or "robots".
Google's famous search engine spider, GoogleBot, uses links on web pages as a sort of freeway. It travels from site to site by following links. When Google finds a new web page, Google will "crawl" the code on the page and transport it back to its datacenter. Google's "FreshBot" may visit "indexed websites" everyday in order to keep the index fresh. How often this is done varies wildly, is often speculated, and varies from site to site.
Drive more traffic to your websiteGoogle's database maintain billions of pages. They use a proprietary formula (or alogorithm) to "score" the relevancy of websites for each search query. The highest ranking, or "most relevant" websites for a specific query are listed first in the search results. "
It indeed does crawl webpages and stores them by keyword, if you would look closely to google pages it searches them by integrity and by each individual keyword. I don't know what you're getting at.
Honestly, Warrior, I don't know what you're getting at either. I've established several times that I understand how the spiders work.
Here is some information on the PageRanking technology they use, it's nothing exclusive to them and nothing super secret. My point still stands, this and most technologies can be replicated and refined pretty easily.
To further help my position:
* Keyword-rich, visible, on-page content in the form of paragraphs of complete sentences (not keyword after keyword separated by commas. This should be informative, descriptive text using words pertaining to your business.)
* Keywords in the title tag
* Keywords in the description tag
* The number of web pages out on the Web that are linking to your site
* The quality of the web pages out on the Web that are linking to your site
* The number of links on a page
* The keyword density of any particular section of text
Sadly, pagerank isn't the only thing Google is using to sort your results. It has to be dynamic. If you honestly think they can pre-order the search results, you're an idiot.
Now to tackle the SQL issue further:
Google's Query Processor
The query processor has several parts, including the user interface (search box), the "engine" that evaluates queries and matches them to relevant documents, and the results formatter.
Here is even more information proving that google indeed handles their database like I said it does
What are you talking about? Are you an idiot? That's
common fucking sense. We all know the general concept; in fact, we've all explicitly stated it during this argument. You're just too busy not paying attention to our points to notice.
To quote from that article
We add and update new sites to our index each time we crawl the web, and we invite you to submit your URL here. We do not add all submitted URLs to our index, and we cannot make any predictions or guarantees about when or if they will appear.
They crawl the web periodicly and update their known database of websites with keywords. It's known and accepted but somehow you're stating that they use something else?
....... FOR FUCKING CHRISTS' SAKE WARRIOR OPEN YOUR MOTHER FUCKING EYES.
Please, go re-read my argument. I've
explicitly,
openly,
without hesitation said that Google uses this general idea. I'm saying that the underlying technology is much more advanced and efficient than anything anyone else has.
You're full of shit.
Obviously, that's what your brain is made out of.
I think I stated pretty much how google works above if you want any more information please post. Good luck.
No you didn't. You stated the obvious once again (the pagerank thing was good, but irrelevant. It's not the only factor that google accounts for when it orders search results).
Hey, give me proof - proof and I'll drop my argument. You have offered nothing and I have offered plenty. See above.
You're just poking at nothing now Sidoh.
I'm going to switch my research paper and study you. You will never cease to amaze me in your oblivious state of mind. I'm done wasting time on you. It's obviously hopeless.
Young life? I'm 17 and 18 in a few days. Years of progress? I've made more progress in a few years than people have made in plenty.
Sadly, that's not going to get you many places by itself. You need a college degree, work experience and opportunities before you can do anything with your new-found knowledge. Sorry to break it to you, but most everyone here has done the same things you have. They've found a passion for some area of technology, decided it was interesting enough to pursue on their own and have done it. True, most people have chosen different areas of study, but in a general way, we're all in the same boat.
I've read more manuals, PDFs, tutorials, articles, blog posts, magazines and been tutored by more people you can count.
Good for you. So have I.
Me defending Microsoft isn't going to change than and you saying something isn't going to change that.
You defending Microsoft is never going to change. Ever-vigilant. Ever-stubborn. Ever-ignorant. Ever-blind.
Try actually addressing something instead of going "OH GOOD ONE IAGO", dolt.
I did. I addressed every single one of your points with great accuracy. Not surprisingly, you completely missed the points in every single one of my arguments. Good job.
