Happy New Year! Yes, the current one, not a previous one; this is a new post, we swear!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Macs are uber safe too. ;O
Blah, I wouldn't agree. Linux and Windows are probably more popular for home use, but a ton of schools use macs.
I don't understand how sidoh couldve used a apple IIe, and be the first computer he used.Apple 2 required some programming knowledge in order to use, and it came out in 1983.
If you ever go into work with graphic or audio editing, I'm nearly positive you will. Like I said, Macs have their purpose. For at least the two things I just listed, they are noticeably superior to the PC.
Not really. Without AltiVec, Macs have no real advantage over PCs, and you can have the same specs on PCs that you can Macs.
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby[17:32:58] <xar> new rule[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 amI'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.That analogy doesn't even make sense. Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT.
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.
As I've stated, inherent compatability is definitely an advantage. Also, if that's all that is keeping PC's from surpassing Macs in every realm, why the fuck don't they implement it?
Because IBM developed the processors that used AltiVec, and they were never up to speed with the processors used on the x86 architecture. That and the x86 architecture doesn't allow for that extra cycle that carries that information.
