Author Topic: iPods Features for the Blind  (Read 3079 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
iPods Features for the Blind
« on: July 10, 2006, 01:09:08 pm »
http://apple.slashdot.org/apple/06/07/10/0345252.shtml

Ahh, but RockBox already has this feature. I guess corporations play catch-up to the open source community again, eh?
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: iPods Features for the Blind
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2006, 01:40:43 pm »
See, the problem is that Apple is patenting something stupidly obvious. 

Why? Because of Microsoft suing them for the iPod interface, even though Microsoft patented it after Apple had invented/released the iPod.  So now Apple is (has to) patent stupid things. 

I hate the way the patent stuff works in the US.  It's stupid. 

Offline Ergot

  • 吴立峰 ^_^ !
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
  • I steal bandwidth. p_o
    • View Profile
Re: iPods Features for the Blind
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2006, 01:45:26 pm »
See, the problem is that Apple is patenting something stupidly obvious. 

Why? Because of Microsoft suing them for the iPod interface, even though Microsoft patented it after Apple had invented/released the iPod.  So now Apple is (has to) patent stupid things. 

I hate the way the patent stuff works in the US.  It's stupid. 
No... Americans are just stupid. Use Google for evidence.
Who gives a damn? I fuck sheep all the time.
And yes, male both ends.  There are a couple lesbians that need a two-ended dildo...My router just refuses to wear a strap-on.
(05:55:03) JoE ThE oDD: omfg good job i got a boner thinkin bout them chinese bitches
(17:54:15) Sidoh: I love cosmetology

Offline deadly7

  • 42
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6496
    • View Profile
Re: iPods Features for the Blind
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2006, 02:50:10 pm »
See, the problem is that Apple is patenting something stupidly obvious. 

Why? Because of Microsoft suing them for the iPod interface, even though Microsoft patented it after Apple had invented/released the iPod.  So now Apple is (has to) patent stupid things. 

I hate the way the patent stuff works in the US.  It's stupid. 
No... Americans are just stupid. Use Googlecommon sense for evidence.
Thought I'd fix up your post for you, Ergot.
[17:42:21.609] <Ergot> Kutsuju you're girlfrieds pussy must be a 403 error for you
 [17:42:25.585] <Ergot> FORBIDDEN

on IRC playing T&T++
<iago> He is unarmed
<Hitmen> he has no arms?!

on AIM with a drunk mythix:
(00:50:05) Mythix: Deadly
(00:50:11) Mythix: I'm going to fuck that red dot out of your head.
(00:50:15) Mythix: with my nine

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: iPods Features for the Blind
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2006, 04:08:19 pm »
I hate the way the patent stuff works in the US.  It's stupid. 
QFT.
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline Warrior

  • supreme mac daddy of trolls
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7503
  • One for a Dime two for a Quarter!
    • View Profile
Re: iPods Features for the Blind
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2006, 04:22:10 pm »
Wow rockbox had this? Cool!

I think the problem with Patents in the US is that it's too ..bah hard to explain. It just doesnt take into account who actually thought of it first it just cares about who filed for the idea first. Then again I think the whole Patent ordeal is stupid.

I mean if two people have the same idea (This may come as a shock but it can happen) the person who profits should be the one who can make it sell. Theres more to making money than an idea, you need to capitalize on that idea and turn it into a product.
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling