« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Why popular AV's are slightly useless  (Read 3069 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Why popular AV's are slightly useless
« on: July 21, 2006, 02:40:48 pm »
http://www.zdnet.com.au/blogs/securifythis/soa/Why_popular_antivirus_apps_do_not_work_/0,39033341,39264249,00.htm

They're useless because people test them before they release their virus into the wild? God, what a brilliant deduction. *nod*

Kaspersky fucking rules. I'm surprised so few people use it. Heh. Symantec blows.
Logged
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 pm
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 am
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »