Poll

What do you think?

better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer
5 (62.5%)
better that ten innocent persons suffer than that one guilty escape
3 (37.5%)

Total Members Voted: 8

Author Topic: Punishing the Innocent  (Read 10603 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Punishing the Innocent
« on: July 19, 2006, 10:37:49 pm »
I'm curious as to what people think and why. Please explain the logic behind your choice.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline leet_muffin

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2166
  • Socialism '08!
    • View Profile
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2006, 10:42:25 pm »
Actually, the poll is a bit extreme, but if it were something in the range of 1:1, Id be more supportive. Also, it depends upon the crime\consequences. If its something to the effect of life in prison, no. Thats just alot of confusion, though. Ill stick with the old "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" ways.
The douchebag method:
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2006, 10:42:52 pm »
Kill them all.  The innocent people were probably stupid and/or shitty drivers.
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline d&q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1427
  • I'm here.
    • View Profile
    • Site
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2006, 10:44:36 pm »
The first option definitely. The American legal system works that way too.
The writ of the founders must endure.

Offline leet_muffin

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2166
  • Socialism '08!
    • View Profile
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2006, 10:45:50 pm »
The first option definitely. The American legal system works that way too.

Notice how many criminals we have on the loose? Sex offenders not reporting\living in areas they should not be? Cool.
The douchebag method:
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

Offline d&q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1427
  • I'm here.
    • View Profile
    • Site
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2006, 11:00:05 pm »
Notice how many innocent people are let to live their lives instead of rotting in jail? Cool.
The writ of the founders must endure.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2006, 11:01:44 pm »
the poll is a bit extreme

See: blackstone's formulation.

I say the second option. The planet is overpopulated as it is, and I'd rather kill everything including the innocent to make sure that no one else has to suffer. If ten innocent people die for every 1 guilty person, that's one less guilty person who could have made those ten, if not hundreds or thousands more, suffer.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2006, 12:45:53 am »
The problem is that everybody here is innocent.  Anybody who picks 'b' has to accept the possibility that they're going to be punished. 

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2006, 01:24:59 am »
A

no innocent person should be punished...but for people proved guilty beyond any reasonable doubt(which could include DNA evidence, eye witnesses, & confessions), death be to them (for some offenses)

Offline GameSnake

  • News hound
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
    • View Profile
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2006, 02:10:46 am »
How would 10 innocent people suffer if 1 person can't escape?!

Offline AntiVirus

  • Legendary
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
  • Best
    • View Profile
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2006, 02:13:08 am »
the poll is a bit extreme

See: blackstone's formulation.

I say the second option. The planet is overpopulated as it is, and I'd rather kill everything including the innocent to make sure that no one else has to suffer. If ten innocent people die for every 1 guilty person, that's one less guilty person who could have made those ten, if not hundreds or thousands more, suffer.
The only thing I see wrong with what you said is that you say the planet is overpopulated, but do you really think that killing these innocent will make it any less overpopulated?  For each one of those that die hundreds more are born. It doesn't do much to the grand total.  Kind of a bad reason to support it. :P
The once grove of splendor,
Aforetime crowned by lilac and lily,
Lay now forevermore slender;
And all winds that liven
Silhouette a lone existence;
A leafless oak grasping at eternity.


"They say that I must learn to kill before I can feel safe, but I rather kill myself then turn into their slave."
- The Rasmus

Offline Rule

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1588
    • View Profile
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #11 on: July 20, 2006, 02:58:01 am »
The problem is that everybody here is innocent. 

Interesting assumption >:D

Guilty of what?  What kind of suffering are we talking about?  I think you need to be more specific.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2006, 03:20:32 am by Rule »

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #12 on: July 20, 2006, 09:22:46 am »
The problem is that everybody here is innocent. 

Interesting assumption >:D
Well, the assumption was important to creating the proper emotional response :P

Guilty of what?  What kind of suffering are we talking about?  I think you need to be more specific.
That's a good point, but I think that, the way it's worded, we have to apply it to everything.  Start with murder, and work your way down to parking tickets. 

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #13 on: July 20, 2006, 09:56:36 am »
Kill them all.  The innocent people were probably stupid and/or shitty drivers.
Or framed.   Real world examples of both options are obvious today.  The american system represents A (albeit somewhat corrupt I'll admit) while China's 'no chance to defend yourself' policies represent B.  I think any system that trys to use fear (excepting fear of reprisal) is flawed.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: Punishing the Innocent
« Reply #14 on: July 20, 2006, 11:54:37 am »
That's a good point, but I think that, the way it's worded, we have to apply it to everything.  Start with murder, and work your way down to parking tickets. 

Correct.

I think any system that trys to use fear (excepting fear of reprisal) is flawed.

We had to read 1984 in our English class. We had to do a project where we decided what ten aspects of life we would control if we took over a government. I said (rather, my group) the first choice would be the armed forces, because ruling through violence will keep the masses in line, and a violent reign of power generates fear in the masses. You don't rule them through this fear, you rule them through punishment and keep them in line. Fear implies you won't do anything bad to them, they just run their lives on fear.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT.