« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Opposite morals (rules split)  (Read 4956 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline AntiVirus

  • Legendary
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
  • Best
    • View Profile
Opposite morals (rules split)
« on: July 17, 2006, 02:41:46 pm »
For everything there is an equal and opposing force.  For good there is evil.  That's how sin came to be.  It's the only way balance is maintained.
Logged
The once grove of splendor,
Aforetime crowned by lilac and lily,
Lay now forevermore slender;
And all winds that liven
Silhouette a lone existence;
A leafless oak grasping at eternity.

"They say that I must learn to kill before I can feel safe, but I rather kill myself then turn into their slave."
- The Rasmus

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2006, 01:47:46 am »
Quote from: AntiVirus on July 17, 2006, 02:41:46 pm
For everything there is an equal and opposing force.  For good there is evil.  That's how sin came to be.  It's the only way balance is maintained.

Conscious or morals don't exert a physical force.  Therefore, Newton's laws don't apply to them.  I don't understand why those types of analogies or relations are made. :\
Logged

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2006, 02:03:39 pm »
Evil only exists because we have a concept of Good.  If there was no Evil, there would only be Neutral.  Anyway, Good and Evil aren't balanced.  If they were, there'd be more people like Hitler.
Logged

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2006, 04:13:29 pm »
Quote from: rabbit on July 19, 2006, 02:03:39 pm
Evil only exists because we have a concept of Good.  If there was no Evil, there would only be Neutral.  Anyway, Good and Evil aren't balanced.  If they were, there'd be more people like Hitler.

'Good' and 'evil' are also relative and subjective terms.  There is nothing objective about either of them, so it's extremely difficult to apply them to any sort of logical set of mathematical rules, such as Newton's laws.
Logged

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2006, 05:00:02 pm »
This is a good conversation but doesn't apply to the rules, so.. split.
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2006, 06:37:34 pm »
::)
Logged

Offline leet_muffin

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2166
  • Socialism '08!
    • View Profile
Re: Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2006, 09:32:53 pm »
Quote from: rabbit on July 19, 2006, 02:03:39 pm
Evil only exists because we have a concept of Good.  If there was no Evil, there would only be Neutral.  Anyway, Good and Evil aren't balanced.  If they were, there'd be more people like Hitler.

You're right, evil totally outbalances good.
Logged
The douchebag method:
Quote from: Trust on April 19, 2008, 02:58:00 am
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2006, 10:19:51 pm »
Quote from: leet_muffin on July 21, 2006, 09:32:53 pm
You're right, evil totally outbalances good.

That completely depends on your point of view and what you believe to be good and what you believe to be evil.

Like I already said, making objective statements (like that) on subjective issues (like this) is pretty useless.  If someone disagrees, there's no real way you can convince them to adopt your oppinion.
Logged

Offline leet_muffin

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2166
  • Socialism '08!
    • View Profile
Re: Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2006, 10:27:39 pm »
Quote from: Sidoh on July 21, 2006, 10:19:51 pm
Quote from: leet_muffin on July 21, 2006, 09:32:53 pm
You're right, evil totally outbalances good.

That completely depends on your point of view and what you believe to be good and what you believe to be evil.

Like I already said, making objective statements (like that) on subjective issues (like this) is pretty useless.  If someone disagrees, there's no real way you can convince them to adopt your oppinion.

Argh, it was a joke, silly.

I was hinting that Hitler = good.
Logged
The douchebag method:
Quote from: Trust on April 19, 2008, 02:58:00 am
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2006, 10:33:02 pm »
Quote from: leet_muffin on July 21, 2006, 10:27:39 pm
Argh, it was a joke, silly.

I was hinting that Hitler = good.

 ::)
Logged

Offline leet_muffin

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2166
  • Socialism '08!
    • View Profile
Re: Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2006, 10:34:53 pm »
Logged
The douchebag method:
Quote from: Trust on April 19, 2008, 02:58:00 am
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Opposite morals (rules split)
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2006, 12:39:12 am »
QQ (jk :-*)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »