Author Topic: 40 reasons to support gun control  (Read 8638 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
40 reasons to support gun control
« on: August 07, 2006, 05:37:59 pm »
(Also known as the proof positive that Liberals are not just stupid, but insane.)

1. Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, and Chicago cops need guns.

2. Washington DC’s low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis’ high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.

3. Statistics showing high murder rates justify gun control but statistics showing increasing murder rates after gun control are "just statistics."

4. The Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban, both of which went into effect in 1994, are responsible for the decrease in violent crime rates, which have been declining since 1991.

5. We must get rid of guns because a deranged lunatic may go on a shooting spree at any time and anyone who would own a gun out of fear of such a lunatic is paranoid.

6. The more helpless you are the safer you are from criminals.

7. An intruder will be incapacitated by tear gas or oven spray, but if shot with a .357 Magnum will get angry and kill you.

8. A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.

9. When confronted by violent criminals, you should "put up no defense — give them what they want, or run" (Handgun Control Inc. Chairman Pete Shields, Guns Don't Die - People Do, 1981, p. 125).

10. The New England Journal of Medicine is filled with expert advice about guns; just like Guns and Ammo has some excellent treatises on heart surgery.

11. One should consult an automotive engineer for safer seatbelts, a civil engineer for a better bridge, a surgeon for spinal paralysis, a computer programmer for Y2K problems, and Sarah Brady [or Sheena Duncan, Adele Kirsten, Peter Storey, etc.] for firearms expertise.

12. The 2nd Amendment, ratified in 1787, refers to the National Guard, which was created by an act of Congress in 1917.

13. The National Guard, funded by the federal government, occupying property leased to the federal government, using weapons owned by the federal government, punishing trespassers under federal law, is a state militia.

14. These phrases," right of the people peaceably to assemble," "right of the people to be secure in their homes," "enumeration's herein of certain rights shall not be construed to disparage others retained by the people," and "The powers not delegated herein are reserved to the states respectively, and to the people," all refer to individuals, but "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" refers to the state.

15. We don't need guns against an oppressive government, because the Constitution has internal safeguards, but we should ban and seize all guns, thereby violating the 2nd, 4th, and 5th amendments to that Constitution.

16. Rifles and handguns aren't necessary to national defense, which is why the army has millions of them.

17. Private citizens shouldn't have handguns, because they serve no military purpose, and private citizens shouldn't have "assault rifles," because they are military weapons.

18. The ready availability of guns today, with waiting periods, background checks, fingerprinting, government forms, et cetera, is responsible for recent school shootings,compared to the lack of school shootings in the 40's, 50's and 60's, which resulted from the availability of guns at hardware stores, surplus stores, gas stations, variety stores, mail order, et cetera

19. The NRA's attempt to run a "don't touch" campaign about kids handling guns is propaganda, and the anti-gun lobby's attempt to run a "don't touch" campaign is responsible social activity.

20. Guns are so complex that special training is necessary to use them properly, and so simple to use that they make murder easy.

21. A handgun, with up to 4 controls, is far too complex for the typical adult to learn to use, as opposed to an automobile that only has 20.

22. Women are just as intelligent and capable as men but a woman with a gun is "an accident waiting to happen" and gun makers' advertisements aimed at women are "preying on their fears."

23. Ordinary people in the presence of guns turn into slaughtering butchers but revert to normal when the weapon is removed.

24. Guns cause violence, which is why there are so many mass killings at gun shows.

25. A majority of the population supports gun control, just like a majority of the population supported owning slaves.

26. A self-loading small arm can legitimately be considered to be a "weapon of mass destruction" or an "assault weapon."

27. Most people can't be trusted, so we should have laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.

28. The right of online pornographers to exist cannot be questioned because it is constitutionally protected by the Bill of Rights, but the use of handguns for self defense is not really protected by the Bill of Rights.

29. Free speech entitles one to own newspapers, transmitters, computers, and typewriters, but self-defense only justifies bare hands.

30. The ACLU is good because it uncompromisingly defends certain parts of the Constitution, and the NRA is bad, because it defends other parts of the Constitution.



31. Charlton Heston as president of the NRA is a shill who should be ignored, but Michael Douglas as a representative of Handgun Control, Inc. is an ambassador for peace who is entitled to an audience at the UN arms control summit.

32. Police operate with backup within groups, which is why they need larger capacity pistol magazines than do "civilians" who must face criminals alone and therefore need less ammunition.

33. We should ban "Saturday Night Specials" and other inexpensive guns because it's not fair that poor people have access to guns too.

34. Police officers, who qualify with their duty weapons once or twice a year, have some special Jedi-like mastery over handguns that private citizens can never hope to obtain.

35. Private citizens don't need a gun for self-protection because the police are there to protect them even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.

36. Citizens don't need to carry a gun for personal protection but police chiefs, who are desk-bound administrators who work in a building filled with cops, need a gun.

37. "Assault weapons" have no purpose other than to kill large numbers of people, which is why the police need them but "civilians" do not.

38. When Microsoft pressures its distributors to give Microsoft preferential promotion, that's bad; but when the Federal government pressures cities to buy guns only from Smith & Wesson, that's good.

39. Trigger locks do not interfere with the ability to use a gun for defensive purposes, which is why you see police officers with one on their duty weapon.

40. When Handgun Control, Inc., says they want to "keep guns out of the wrong hands," they don't mean you. Really.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2006, 06:39:11 pm »
I support gun control. Don't drink and shoot.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2006, 08:21:58 pm »
I support gun control. Don't drink and shoot.
I hope you mean that literally.
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline dark_drake

  • Mufasa was 10x the lion Simba was.
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2440
  • Dun dun dun
    • View Profile
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2006, 11:29:22 pm »
2. Washington DC’s low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis’ high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.
Really, you need to take in some more mitigating factors with that statistic. It's Washington. Of course people are going to kill some people they mistake for congressmen.
errr... something like that...

Offline deadly7

  • 42
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6496
    • View Profile
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2006, 01:01:34 pm »
Whoever wrote this is retarded.

How is Indianapolis' murder rate (9/100000) high when DC's murder rate (69/100000) is low?
[17:42:21.609] <Ergot> Kutsuju you're girlfrieds pussy must be a 403 error for you
 [17:42:25.585] <Ergot> FORBIDDEN

on IRC playing T&T++
<iago> He is unarmed
<Hitmen> he has no arms?!

on AIM with a drunk mythix:
(00:50:05) Mythix: Deadly
(00:50:11) Mythix: I'm going to fuck that red dot out of your head.
(00:50:15) Mythix: with my nine

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2006, 01:08:59 pm »
Whoever wrote this is retarded.

How is Indianapolis' murder rate (9/100000) high when DC's murder rate (69/100000) is low?
the entire list is laced with sarcasm like that...

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2006, 01:35:18 pm »
Whoever wrote this is retarded.

How is Indianapolis' murder rate (9/100000) high when DC's murder rate (69/100000) is low?
the entire list is laced with sarcasm like that...
Yeah, and most of it is really stupid. 

I picked one at random, #34.  They're implying that police, with years of training, have some special Jedi power which lets them use a gun better than civilians?  No.  They have training!  Duh. 

I also noticed one (near the Jedi one) that said that citizens have to face criminals alone.  Do civilians really need guns to combat crime?  I don't think vigilantes are the majority of the gun owners..

If the whole list is that stupid, then the list sucks. 

<edit> I posted the reason why I like gun control originally, but I decided to get rid of it.  I don't want to get into that again. 
« Last Edit: August 08, 2006, 01:37:53 pm by iago »

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #7 on: August 08, 2006, 01:46:54 pm »
Whoever wrote this is retarded.

How is Indianapolis' murder rate (9/100000) high when DC's murder rate (69/100000) is low?
the entire list is laced with sarcasm like that...
Yeah, and most of it is really stupid. 

I picked one at random, #34.  They're implying that police, with years of training, have some special Jedi power which lets them use a gun better than civilians?  No.  They have training!  Duh. 

I also noticed one (near the Jedi one) that said that citizens have to face criminals alone.  Do civilians really need guns to combat crime?  I don't think vigilantes are the majority of the gun owners..

If the whole list is that stupid, then the list sucks. 

<edit> I posted the reason why I like gun control originally, but I decided to get rid of it.  I don't want to get into that again. 
Again......sarcasm.

Civilians can have trainning also

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2006, 02:10:25 pm »
Yeah, police having "Jedi powers" that lets them use guns is sarcasm.  As I said, it's implying that police shouldn't be considered special, which is bogus.  Of course police are special, they don't spend years in training for fun. 

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #9 on: August 08, 2006, 02:14:38 pm »
They're just ordinary people that are trained, everyone can take the same gun classes

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #10 on: August 08, 2006, 07:51:43 pm »
Actually, the police and armed forces do have more specialized training than a civilian can get normally (without joining the police or armed forces).

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #11 on: August 08, 2006, 07:55:49 pm »
What I believe he list is attempting to sa in #34 is that it is inherent within the person, that they are *naturally* better with a gun, and that no matter how much training, a civilian can't ever hope to come close. 
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #12 on: August 08, 2006, 10:25:05 pm »
What I believe he list is attempting to sa in #34 is that it is inherent within the person, that they are *naturally* better with a gun, and that no matter how much training, a civilian can't ever hope to come close. 

Of course they aren't naturally better.  But I don't see how that matters, since police have special training and know how to use a gun better than the majority of civilians.  So they are better at using guns, yes. 

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #13 on: August 08, 2006, 10:41:53 pm »
Let's also not forget that any city, such as DC, which has upper and lower classes, but no middle class, unlike Indianapolis, which does have all three classes, is bound to have more crime anyway.

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: 40 reasons to support gun control
« Reply #14 on: August 09, 2006, 12:09:40 am »
Let's also not forget that any city, such as DC, which has upper and lower classes, but no middle class, unlike Indianapolis, which does have all three classes, is bound to have more crime anyway.

.....

How does that have any bearing on the argument?  Only the middle class should be allowed to own guns?
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.