You said it would suck because they dont charge much.
No, I didn't. You misread what I said. I've explained it an additional time already; go back and read it.
I said it seems over rated.
You can speculate all you want, but until you come up with any sort of concrete evidence, I don't suggest you loudly claim these beliefs.
Yeah, there is a difference, but it appears to me that my judging was less harsh & unwarranted. You just said the school would suck, period. I just claimed that Harvard seems over rated for what they charge.
Again, you misread what I posted (twice). Go back and read.
As true as that may be, I wasn't arguing that point. I was referring to RoMi's statement that Harvard matches 100% of all costs. In my experience, this only holds true for all who make $60,000 or less.
Yes, I recognize that. However, it's an important point to address if someone is complaining about the tuition of Harvard.
Your idea that undergrads would relate to GTAs better, than to professors isn't necessarily true.
Which is precicely why I worded that entire paragraph the way I did. I didn't say that it was always the case. I said that it, by the logic defined in that paragraph, would make sense (
generally speaking) for the GTA's to have an easier time connecting with students.
I for one, would much prefer a professor teaching me because I would know that any and all questions I had would definitely be answered(correctly). Some at Harvard believe the graduate teaching assistants tend to be aloof and ineffective compared to professors. I have not only been told this about Harvard, but many other universities also.
I'm sure that is the case in several instances, but I will personally say that I have awesome GTA's who do their job wonderfully.