Happy New Year! Yes, the current one, not a previous one; this is a new post, we swear!
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I'm talking about the install sequence. I see no reason for it to not be an option.
It's a kernel, though! It should be implemented into the install sequence.
Then they should fix it.
Quote from: Sidoh on October 04, 2006, 12:19:48 pmI'm talking about the install sequence. I see no reason for it to not be an option. Because it's considered beta/'testing', which means it won't always work. Quote from: Sidoh on October 04, 2006, 12:19:48 pmIt's a kernel, though! It should be implemented into the install sequence.Because it's considered beta/'testing', which means it won't always work. Quote from: Sidoh on October 04, 2006, 12:19:48 pmThen they should fix it. Why do you think it's beta?
But when you compiled it, it's configured differently than the way Slackware configured it. That's probably why.
But yeah, you're suggesting that they make this beta version, which didn't work on your laptop, should be easier to install? Make it easier for people to potentially render their installation unusable? Phoey!
I'd personally do as Joe suggests
You might be right about that, Joe.
In the linux world, there's unstable, stable, and release. A finished version is always marked "release", and a working beta is "stable".
www.slackware.com.I'm getting my three install disks as we speak.