Author Topic: For Blaze..  (Read 5675 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
For Blaze..
« on: November 26, 2006, 02:41:50 am »
(01:38:02) [x86] Joe: Johnny was a Chemist's son but Johnny is no more
(01:38:11) [x86] Joe: For what he thought was H20 was H2SO4
(01:38:29) Blaze: Subscript, please.
(01:38:59) [x86] Joe: H2O
(01:39:08) Blaze: Fail.
(01:39:08) [x86] Joe: H2SO4
(01:39:12) [x86] Joe: Paste it on the forums!
(01:39:14) Blaze: Almost pass.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2006, 04:56:01 am »
What the hell is H20? ???

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2006, 05:05:46 am »
There's no (extremely) easy way to subscript an IM.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2006, 12:26:02 pm »
There's no (extremely) easy way to subscript an IM.

That still doesn't answer my question. :S

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2006, 04:59:08 pm »
Haha, I typed H Two Zero.

Elemental Hydrogen. A lot of it.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #5 on: November 26, 2006, 05:01:12 pm »
Haha, I typed H Two Zero.

Elemental Hydrogen. A lot of it.

Chemical notation suggests that the materials are bonded. :P

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2006, 01:57:14 am »
It's a big molecule of Hydrogen. Probably pretty unstable.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2006, 02:47:34 am »
It's a big molecule of Hydrogen. Probably pretty unstable.

Probably pretty impossible.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2006, 10:15:33 pm »
It's a big molecule of Hydrogen. Probably pretty unstable.

Probably pretty impossible.

Hard, but not impossible. It'd try bonding with something else, but you can bond 20 hydrogen atoms together, can't you?..
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2006, 11:22:00 pm »
Hard, but not impossible. It'd try bonding with something else, but you can bond 20 hydrogen atoms together, can't you?..

Take a chemistry course, Joe...

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #10 on: November 28, 2006, 12:40:43 pm »
Hydrogen atoms can only bond with one other element.  So the best you can do is 2 of them. 


But to answer your original question, H20 is a movie sequel to Halloween 7ish, that takes place 20 years later.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2006, 12:44:02 pm »
Oooooh.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2006, 05:04:04 pm »
Hard, but not impossible. It'd try bonding with something else, but you can bond 20 hydrogen atoms together, can't you?..

Take a chemistry course, Joe...

Take the rest of my classes and make me a senior, Sidoh. Until then, please don't complain that I haven't taken senior classes. :P
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #13 on: November 28, 2006, 05:20:29 pm »
Take the rest of my classes and make me a senior, Sidoh. Until then, please don't complain that I haven't taken senior classes. :P

Chemistry isn't a senior class...

If you aren't knowledgeable in a subject, I don't recommend you say things suggesting you are.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: For Blaze..
« Reply #14 on: November 28, 2006, 08:59:34 pm »
Hard, but not impossible. It'd try bonding with something else, but you can bond 20 hydrogen atoms together, can't you?..

Take a chemistry course, Joe...

Take the rest of my classes and make me a senior, Sidoh. Until then, please don't complain that I haven't taken senior classes. :P

I took chemistry sophomore year. Passed with a B. :)

EDIT -- Don't remember a goddamn thing.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT.