Author Topic: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception  (Read 9246 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Armin

  • Honorary Leader
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2480
    • View Profile
Hitmen: art is gay

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2006, 08:30:47 pm »
75%, 0.9.  No musical training.

I'm pretty sure I have a hearing problem too, but I don't suppose that affects this sort of a test when you're wearing headphones.

Neat test, by the way.

Offline Ergot

  • 吴立峰 ^_^ !
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
  • I steal bandwidth. p_o
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2006, 10:58:20 pm »
Umm... 75% 12.3!? The second test is terrible... I took it once and it said it failed or was out of range or something, took it again got 12.3 :|
Who gives a damn? I fuck sheep all the time.
And yes, male both ends.  There are a couple lesbians that need a two-ended dildo...My router just refuses to wear a strap-on.
(05:55:03) JoE ThE oDD: omfg good job i got a boner thinkin bout them chinese bitches
(17:54:15) Sidoh: I love cosmetology

Offline AntiVirus

  • Legendary
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
  • Best
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2006, 11:00:55 pm »
Rofl.. I did terrible on the first one.  But I think it was because my room mate and his friend were being really loud.  Either way, I got 69.4% on the first one, and then an error on the second one.  The same Error Ergot had.
The once grove of splendor,
Aforetime crowned by lilac and lily,
Lay now forevermore slender;
And all winds that liven
Silhouette a lone existence;
A leafless oak grasping at eternity.


"They say that I must learn to kill before I can feel safe, but I rather kill myself then turn into their slave."
- The Rasmus

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2006, 11:35:54 pm »
55.6%
8.1

This is just further proof of something I already know -- I am absolutely tonedeaf and have no musical talent whatsoever :)

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2006, 02:57:42 am »
44.4%. Good game, iago, but I lose!
« Last Edit: December 11, 2006, 03:24:44 am by Joe[x86] »
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2006, 07:07:25 am »
55.6%
8.1

This is just further proof of something I already know -- I am absolutely tonedeaf and have no musical talent whatsoever :)
You would be a great country singer...

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2006, 10:38:40 am »
I haven't taken the test yet, but I imagine this test is pretty flawed considering the limitations of most computer headphones/speakers.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2006, 11:17:34 am »
I haven't taken the test yet, but I imagine this test is pretty flawed considering the limitations of most computer headphones/speakers.

The differences in frequency aren't that significant.  I doubt it would be a problem.  I was able to pretty easily tell the difference in pitch at 1.5 Hz with a $15 pair of headphones.

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2006, 11:45:49 am »
IIRC our hearing capability should detect changes in sound on the order of 1dB.  Again, IIRC, most cheap headphones can only handle changes of about 3-4dB.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2006, 12:11:08 pm »
IIRC our hearing capability should detect changes in sound on the order of 1dB.  Again, IIRC, most cheap headphones can only handle changes of about 3-4dB.

I don't think that decibels are 1:1 with Hz, though.  I thought it was the log of power and intensity or something like that.  It's been a while since I've looked at that stuff.

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2006, 12:26:04 pm »
yea, I wasn't trying to suggest a linear relationship with frequency.  I've tried to reword what I'm trying to say a few times and still don't think I'm saying it right, so...meh.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2006, 12:33:47 pm by unTactical »

Offline Towelie

  • pwnstar
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4873
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2006, 04:17:24 pm »
80.6 on the tone deaf, and .75 on pitch
my speakers suck too much to do good on the pitch test :P

Offline Armin

  • Honorary Leader
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2480
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2006, 05:24:21 pm »
IIRC our hearing capability should detect changes in sound on the order of 1dB.  Again, IIRC, most cheap headphones can only handle changes of about 3-4dB.

I don't think that decibels are 1:1 with Hz, though.  I thought it was the log of power and intensity or something like that.  It's been a while since I've looked at that stuff.
Decibels (dB) is intensity/loudness, while frequency (Hz) is pitch.
Hitmen: art is gay

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2006, 05:53:53 pm »
Decibels (dB) is intensity/loudness, while frequency (Hz) is pitch.

A decibel is a way to measure "loudness."  Saying it is intensity/loudness is sort of like using a word you're trying to define in a definition.  Furthermore, a dB is dimensionless.  It's just a number.

The measurement is defined in several ways, but they all include a base 10 logarithm of a ratio between some measured number and a reference number.  A common example is intensity:



I_0 is usually defined as the "threshold of human hearing."

More accurately, frequency is the number of cyles a wave has per unit time (Hz is cycles/second).  If you have a pressure wave moving in air, it's the number of full cycles that pass a fixed point in some given number of time (again, usually 1 second).  It's also the inverse of the period, which you'll probably be able to deduct (if you didn't know already; I sort of expect you do, since you like sound and all) is the amount of time that passes during one cycle of the wave.  Pitch is kind of... the perception of frequency.

Offline GameSnake

  • News hound
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #15 on: December 11, 2006, 06:55:20 pm »
Very neat test! I need to know pitch differences when I tune my guitar.

Offline Armin

  • Honorary Leader
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2480
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2006, 07:34:14 pm »
Decibels (dB) is intensity/loudness, while frequency (Hz) is pitch.

A decibel is a way to measure "loudness."  Saying it is intensity/loudness is sort of like using a word you're trying to define in a definition.  Furthermore, a dB is dimensionless.  It's just a number.

The measurement is defined in several ways, but they all include a base 10 logarithm of a ratio between some measured number and a reference number.  A common example is intensity:



I_0 is usually defined as the "threshold of human hearing."

More accurately, frequency is the number of cyles a wave has per unit time (Hz is cycles/second).  If you have a pressure wave moving in air, it's the number of full cycles that pass a fixed point in some given number of time (again, usually 1 second).  It's also the inverse of the period, which you'll probably be able to deduct (if you didn't know already; I sort of expect you do, since you like sound and all) is the amount of time that passes during one cycle of the wave.  Pitch is kind of... the perception of frequency.
Yeah, I thought you were trying to say something else.
Hitmen: art is gay

Offline GameSnake

  • News hound
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2006, 09:18:21 pm »
A lower pitch has longer, more slow waves waves, while higher pitch has shorter, more frequent waves.. It's elementary really.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #18 on: December 11, 2006, 10:08:25 pm »
A lower pitch has longer, more slow waves waves, while higher pitch has shorter, more frequent waves.. It's elementary really.

A lower pitch can be directly inferred from a low frequency, yes, but the velocity of a pressure wave in air (speed of sound) is constant if the conditions it's traveling in are constant.

Like I said "pitch" is the conception of frequency.  I still don't think you know much about waves, which you've seemed to demonstrate here.

Offline Armin

  • Honorary Leader
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2480
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #19 on: December 11, 2006, 10:41:46 pm »
A lower pitch has longer, more slow waves waves, while higher pitch has shorter, more frequent waves.. It's elementary really.

A lower pitch can be directly inferred from a low frequency, yes, but the velocity of a pressure wave in air (speed of sound) is constant if the conditions it's traveling in are constant.
If I'm thinking of the right thing, an example of this is talking after you suck up helium. Even if the wavelength is exactly the same, helium, being a lighter gas that moves more quickly, will result in a higher pitch.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2006, 11:36:26 pm by Metal Militia »
Hitmen: art is gay

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #20 on: December 12, 2006, 12:26:20 am »
If I'm thinking of the right thing, an example of this is talking after you suck up helium. Even if the wavelength is exactly the same, helium, being a lighter gas that moves more quickly, will result in a higher pitch.

Yeah. 

However, the speed of sound in a substance is relational to its density, not weight.  This is why the only quantative way to define the "regular" speed of sound must involve a temperature.

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #21 on: December 12, 2006, 12:28:35 am »
note that v in that equation is the wave speed in a vacuum, frequency is constant for a given wave (the wavelength changes proportionally).

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #22 on: December 12, 2006, 12:32:39 am »
note that v in that equation is the wave speed in a vacuum, frequency is constant for a given wave (the wavelength changes proportionally).

mmhm

Offline Super_X

  • I suck.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1340
  • I suck!
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #23 on: December 12, 2006, 05:48:59 pm »
A lower pitch has longer, more slow waves waves, while higher pitch has shorter, more frequent waves.. It's elementary really.

Yes, Watson. Quite elementary, indeed.

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #24 on: December 12, 2006, 07:06:03 pm »
I didn't have the patience for the first test.  On the second, I got 0.525 Hz.

Of course I was a musician for 9 years of my life, including a year in college, where you need to be able to do that kind of thing... ;)
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline GameSnake

  • News hound
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #25 on: December 12, 2006, 10:31:53 pm »
A lower pitch has longer, more slow waves waves, while higher pitch has shorter, more frequent waves.. It's elementary really.

A lower pitch can be directly inferred from a low frequency, yes, but the velocity of a pressure wave in air (speed of sound) is constant if the conditions it's traveling in are constant.

Like I said "pitch" is the conception of frequency.  I still don't think you know much about waves, which you've seemed to demonstrate here.
No I dont much about waves.. If you know so much about everything what do you plan to do with yourself? I know chicken salad from chicken shit.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #26 on: December 12, 2006, 10:38:01 pm »
No I dont much about waves.. If you know so much about everything what do you plan to do with yourself? I know chicken salad from chicken shit.
Can you explain the difference, please?  Because last week, I had a bit of an incident.....

Offline GameSnake

  • News hound
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #27 on: December 12, 2006, 10:39:32 pm »
No I dont much about waves.. If you know so much about everything what do you plan to do with yourself? I know chicken salad from chicken shit.
Can you explain the difference, please?  Because last week, I had a bit of an incident.....
Just dont eat the soft, brown colored material that smells foul and you'll be OK.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #28 on: December 13, 2006, 03:07:53 am »
No I dont much about waves.. If you know so much about everything what do you plan to do with yourself? I know chicken salad from chicken shit.

Software engineer.

You said it was elementary, which seemed to "imply" that you knew what you were talking about. ;)

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #29 on: December 13, 2006, 10:01:02 am »
Just dont eat the soft, brown colored material that smells foul and you'll be OK.
So avoid KFC?  Got it.

Offline GameSnake

  • News hound
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
    • View Profile
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #30 on: December 13, 2006, 01:06:46 pm »
Just dont eat the soft, brown colored material that smells foul and you'll be OK.
So avoid KFC?  Got it.
Chicken poo/KFC might be the same thing.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #31 on: December 13, 2006, 01:31:33 pm »
I like KFC. :-\

I wouldn't advise insulting it, though.  Deuce might kill you in your sleep.

Offline d&q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1427
  • I'm here.
    • View Profile
    • Site
Re: Tonedeafness + Pitch Perception
« Reply #32 on: December 13, 2006, 06:33:46 pm »
Haha, I'll probably just rape you while you're awake.  ;)
The writ of the founders must endure.