Pretty crazy that we're closer to 2030, than we are 2005. Where did the time go!
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby[17:32:58] <xar> new rule[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 amI'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.That analogy doesn't even make sense. Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT.
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.
iago use the linux
I'm pretty sure this was posted on here before. iago or someone articulated the reasoning behind it quite well, if I remember correctly.
Well la de da. Didn't look for it. I didn't recall hearing about it, so I assumed it wasn't already posted.
No, I remember it being posted here less than a year ago. "Old" Here's the link.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests
You might be right about that, Joe.
Long story short: it's because of a bug when deciding whether or not a file is unicode. And incidentally, it's not all about 4 3 3 5. For example, "Bush hid the truth" doesn't work.
Quote from: iago on January 07, 2007, 08:26:12 pmLong story short: it's because of a bug when deciding whether or not a file is unicode. And incidentally, it's not all about 4 3 3 5. For example, "Bush hid the truth" doesn't work. It's not really a bug. A heuristic is being used to guess whether a text file with no indication as to whether it is Unicode or not is probably Unicode. As such, it's really just making an educated guess based on whether something is likely Unicode or not, and like most guesses, sometimes it gets it wrong.
And it doesn't learn from its mistakes either! Sheesh.
Quote from: AntiVirus on January 08, 2007, 11:40:12 pmAnd it doesn't learn from its mistakes either! Sheesh. If it could identify a mistake, there wouldn't be any...
.... It was a joke. And there would be a mistake. It would have to make atleast one mistake first before it learned from it. That's how you learn from mistakes, you make them.
Quote from: AntiVirus on January 09, 2007, 11:35:24 am.... It was a joke. And there would be a mistake. It would have to make atleast one mistake first before it learned from it. That's how you learn from mistakes, you make them.How's it going to learn from a mistake if it's unable to identify it? That was my point.
Hmm, I wonder if there's some way to fool it for longer text?That might be useful for somebody who wants to raise the bar for viewing source on their website, since IE opens source in notepad.
That's assuming they take the entire file as a sample. Perhaps they take the first 1024 bytes, in which case it'd be much more possible.
I don't know about you, but I'd hate to have to click "Yep, it's encoded correctly" every time I opened something with notepad.