« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Lockdown  (Read 12029 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hdx

  • The Hdx!
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 311
  • <3 Java/Cpp/VB/QB
    • View Profile
Lockdown
« on: February 24, 2007, 10:34:16 pm »
[Joe Edit: Split from *me*]

Just a note:
Lockdown is completely possible to do in Java ;)
But its not working yet.
~Hdx
« Last Edit: March 06, 2007, 06:23:15 pm by Joe[x86] »
Logged
http://img140.exs.cx/img140/6720/hdxnew6lb.gif
09/08/05 - Clan SBs @ USEast
 [19:59:04.000] <DeadHelp> We don't like customers.
 [19:59:05.922] <DeadHelp> They're assholes
 [19:59:08.094] <DeadHelp> And they're never right.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Lockdown
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2007, 04:35:00 pm »
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on February 24, 2007, 10:34:16 pm
Just a note:
Lockdown is completely possible to do in Java ;)
But its not working yet.
~Hdx

Dumping StarCraft's RAM image to a file is cheating, results in massive "hash files", and will be broken as soon as someone implements it and Blizzard changes lockdown to hash the location it loaded itself into memory as well.

Just sayin'. :P
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

Offline Hdx

  • The Hdx!
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 311
  • <3 Java/Cpp/VB/QB
    • View Profile
Lockdown
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2007, 12:15:13 pm »
It already hashes itself.
From what I've seen/heard it grabs from the dll, the 3 main files, and your gfx buffer.
Something like that.
~Hdx
Logged
http://img140.exs.cx/img140/6720/hdxnew6lb.gif
09/08/05 - Clan SBs @ USEast
 [19:59:04.000] <DeadHelp> We don't like customers.
 [19:59:05.922] <DeadHelp> They're assholes
 [19:59:08.094] <DeadHelp> And they're never right.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Lockdown
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2007, 06:22:20 pm »
So wait -- for each lockdown, you'd have to have the image of itself in memory? Can that be gotten from the DLL itself without loading it?

The graphics buffer, I think, would be stupidly easy as it's the same each time (lockdown runs at the same point).
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

trust

  • Guest
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2007, 09:02:43 pm »
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on February 24, 2007, 10:34:16 pm
[Joe Edit: Split from *me*]

Just a note:
Lockdown is completely possible to do in Java ;)
But its not working yet.
~Hdx

I'm pretty sure I wrote a lockdown plugin for JavaOp v1 if you can find it.
Logged

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2007, 09:20:40 pm »
I'm almost positive you're confused. :P

The only ones who have gotten lockdown working are Yoni and/or Skywing, or those who have done so and kept it private. But if you did, "flippin' awesome!".
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2007, 09:51:54 pm »
Quote from: OG Trust on March 06, 2007, 09:02:43 pm
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on February 24, 2007, 10:34:16 pm
[Joe Edit: Split from *me*]

Just a note:
Lockdown is completely possible to do in Java ;)
But its not working yet.
~Hdx

I'm pretty sure I wrote a lockdown plugin for JavaOp v1 if you can find it.
Lockdown is a new type of checkrevision created by Battle.net which hashes various parts of memory, and does some other things.  Not channel lockdown, which is retarded.
Logged

Offline abc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
    • View Profile
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2007, 09:58:27 pm »
** & warz
Logged

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2007, 10:09:01 pm »
Nope. warz never finished.
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

trust

  • Guest
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2007, 10:25:46 pm »
Quote from: rabbit on March 06, 2007, 09:51:54 pm
Quote from: OG Trust on March 06, 2007, 09:02:43 pm
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on February 24, 2007, 10:34:16 pm
[Joe Edit: Split from *me*]

Just a note:
Lockdown is completely possible to do in Java ;)
But its not working yet.
~Hdx

I'm pretty sure I wrote a lockdown plugin for JavaOp v1 if you can find it.
Lockdown is a new type of checkrevision created by Battle.net which hashes various parts of memory, and does some other things.  Not channel lockdown, which is retarded.

oh sorry, yeah I was talking about channel lockdown.
Logged

Offline Furious

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1833
  • I hate rabbits
    • View Profile
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2007, 07:31:37 am »
Quote from: OG Trust on March 06, 2007, 10:25:46 pm
Quote from: rabbit on March 06, 2007, 09:51:54 pm
Quote from: OG Trust on March 06, 2007, 09:02:43 pm
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on February 24, 2007, 10:34:16 pm
[Joe Edit: Split from *me*]

Just a note:
Lockdown is completely possible to do in Java ;)
But its not working yet.
~Hdx

I'm pretty sure I wrote a lockdown plugin for JavaOp v1 if you can find it.
Lockdown is a new type of checkrevision created by Battle.net which hashes various parts of memory, and does some other things.  Not channel lockdown, which is retarded.

oh sorry, yeah I was talking about channel lockdown.

Lol  :P
Logged
Quote
[23:04:34] <deadly7[x86]> Newby[x86]
[23:04:35] <deadly7[x86]> YOU ARE AN EMO
[23:04:39] <Newby[x86]> shush it woman

Quote
[17:53:31] InsaneJoey[e2] was banned by x86 (GO EAT A BAG OF FUCK ASSHOLE (randomban)).

Quote from: Ergot
Put it this way Joe... you're on my Buddy List... if there's no one else on an you're the only one, I'd rather talk to myself.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2007, 11:04:28 am »
Quote from: Furious on March 07, 2007, 07:31:37 am
Quote from: OG Trust on March 06, 2007, 10:25:46 pm
Quote from: rabbit on March 06, 2007, 09:51:54 pm
Quote from: OG Trust on March 06, 2007, 09:02:43 pm
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on February 24, 2007, 10:34:16 pm
[Joe Edit: Split from *me*]

Just a note:
Lockdown is completely possible to do in Java ;)
But its not working yet.
~Hdx

I'm pretty sure I wrote a lockdown plugin for JavaOp v1 if you can find it.
Lockdown is a new type of checkrevision created by Battle.net which hashes various parts of memory, and does some other things.  Not channel lockdown, which is retarded.

oh sorry, yeah I was talking about channel lockdown.

Lol  :P

What a waste of like a kilobit of bandwidth for me.
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

Offline Furious

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1833
  • I hate rabbits
    • View Profile
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2007, 11:05:39 am »
Quote from: Joe[x86] on March 07, 2007, 11:04:28 am
Quote from: Furious on March 07, 2007, 07:31:37 am
Quote from: OG Trust on March 06, 2007, 10:25:46 pm
Quote from: rabbit on March 06, 2007, 09:51:54 pm
Quote from: OG Trust on March 06, 2007, 09:02:43 pm
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on February 24, 2007, 10:34:16 pm
[Joe Edit: Split from *me*]

Just a note:
Lockdown is completely possible to do in Java ;)
But its not working yet.
~Hdx

I'm pretty sure I wrote a lockdown plugin for JavaOp v1 if you can find it.
Lockdown is a new type of checkrevision created by Battle.net which hashes various parts of memory, and does some other things.  Not channel lockdown, which is retarded.

oh sorry, yeah I was talking about channel lockdown.

Lol  :P

What a waste of like a kilobit of bandwidth for me.

That's what I say when I read half of your topics. *shrug*
Logged
Quote
[23:04:34] <deadly7[x86]> Newby[x86]
[23:04:35] <deadly7[x86]> YOU ARE AN EMO
[23:04:39] <Newby[x86]> shush it woman

Quote
[17:53:31] InsaneJoey[e2] was banned by x86 (GO EAT A BAG OF FUCK ASSHOLE (randomban)).

Quote from: Ergot
Put it this way Joe... you're on my Buddy List... if there's no one else on an you're the only one, I'd rather talk to myself.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2007, 11:14:10 am »
*shrug*

Note that this is Hdx's topic. :P
Logged
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 pm
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 pm
You might be right about that, Joe.

Offline K20A2

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • botdev god
    • View Profile
Re: Lockdown
« Reply #14 on: March 10, 2007, 03:18:40 am »
Quote from: Joe[x86] on March 02, 2007, 04:35:00 pm
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on February 24, 2007, 10:34:16 pm
Just a note:
Lockdown is completely possible to do in Java ;)
But its not working yet.
~Hdx

Dumping StarCraft's RAM image to a file is cheating, results in massive "hash files", and will be broken as soon as someone implements it and Blizzard changes lockdown to hash the location it loaded itself into memory as well.

Just sayin'. :P

Dumping the "RAM image" is rather useless.  You just need to hash the three versioncheck files using a generated key from the server as well as a hash calculated off of the game's DirectX video buffer.

The whole idea behind lockdown isn't that complicated.  The only hack it checks for is pplug114.bwl (by trying to get the base address of it), but then again if you have a hack loaded, it probably modified the game's memory which is put through hash (not the actual files on disk, once again, it gets the base address of the files loaded).  Just finding exactly what it hashes is the hard part.

It is easier to write your own implementation than to write a workaround for loading Blizzard's version
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
« previous next »