Author Topic: New MMO from Blizzard? (Read 15843 times)

Newby · « **on:** April 27, 2007, 09:51:35 pm »

http://blizzard.com/jobopp/

"next-gen MMO"

Sounds pretty intense... World of Starcraft? World of Diablo? Something new?

d&q · « **Reply #1 on:** April 27, 2007, 09:57:09 pm »

Quote

MysticBrolly 99 (6:00:54 PM): the job openings are most likely for the new wow expansion

I could possibly agree.

Newby · « **Reply #2 on:** April 27, 2007, 10:12:39 pm »

Quote from: Deuce on April 27, 2007, 09:57:09 pm

Quote
MysticBrolly 99 (6:00:54 PM): the job openings are most likely for the new wow expansion

I could possibly agree.

I could too, except lead engine developer is really uhh.. what's the word.. drastic (!) for a simple expansion.

rabbit · « **Reply #3 on:** April 27, 2007, 10:20:02 pm »

Star of Diablocraft: Brood Portal.

Blaze · « **Reply #4 on:** April 27, 2007, 10:30:55 pm »

Worlds of Starcraft would be awesome, and last time I talked to someone at Blizzard about it, she said that they thought about it, but there were a lot of details they'd have to work out for it to be possible, one of them is hiring a lot more employees.

skip · « **Reply #5 on:** April 27, 2007, 11:26:00 pm »

http://kotaku.com/gaming/luke%7C-i-just-soiled-myself/blizz-confirms-new-product-next-month-255518.php

OMGOSH. I can't believe it. WOOPY!

YAYAYAYAY!

:]!

lets just hope it's not pay to play.

In other news:

Quote

April 25, 2007
StarCraft Patch 1.15
We will be releasing Patch 1.15 for StarCraft within the next few weeks. This patch introduces new functionality to Battle.net that allows players to organize and join custom StarCraft leagues. These leagues support stat-tracking, custom icons, and replay uploading, among other features. Check out the StarCraft LDK page for more information.

Newby · « **Reply #6 on:** April 27, 2007, 11:38:57 pm »

An MMO is not going to be free. Heh.

wires · « **Reply #7 on:** April 27, 2007, 11:41:53 pm »

Quote from: Blaze on April 27, 2007, 10:30:55 pm

Worlds of Starcraft would be awesome, and last time I talked to someone at Blizzard about it, she said that they thought about it, but there were a lot of details they'd have to work out for it to be possible, one of them is hiring a lot more employees.

I don't see a Starcraft MMO game, it just doesn't fit the style I don't think. ;\

rabbit · « **Reply #8 on:** April 28, 2007, 07:48:22 am »

Quote from: Newby on April 27, 2007, 11:38:57 pm

An MMO is not going to be free. Heh.

Guild Wars?

iago · « **Reply #9 on:** April 28, 2007, 08:02:49 am »

Quote from: Newby on April 27, 2007, 11:38:57 pm

An MMO is not going to be free. Heh.

Planeshift?

trust · « **Reply #10 on:** April 28, 2007, 08:30:11 am »

Probably finally Starcraft Ghost!

Ender · « **Reply #11 on:** April 28, 2007, 08:36:25 am »

Starcraft 2's gonna suck,... They can't possibly beat Starcraft, the best game ever.

Warrior · « **Reply #12 on:** April 28, 2007, 09:05:23 am »

A *good* MMO is going to cost money.

rabbit · « **Reply #13 on:** April 28, 2007, 10:45:03 am »

Quote from: Warrior[x86] on April 28, 2007, 09:05:23 am

A *good* MMO is going to cost money.

Guild Wars?

Warrior · « **Reply #14 on:** April 28, 2007, 11:21:05 am »

No, a good MMO. As in one that's actually enjoyable and filled with content, actively updated with content, and home to 8 million subscribers. That's the kind of MMORPG I'd pay for.

trust · « **Reply #15 on:** April 28, 2007, 03:05:06 pm »

Quote from: Warrior[x86] on April 28, 2007, 11:21:05 am

No, a good MMO. As in one that's actually enjoyable and filled with content, actively updated with content, and home to 8 million subscribers. That's the kind of MMORPG I'd pay for.

Guild Wars?

Sidoh · « **Reply #16 on:** April 28, 2007, 03:16:05 pm »

Guild Wars has 8 million subscribers?

trust · « **Reply #17 on:** April 28, 2007, 04:22:57 pm »

Quote from: Sidoh on April 28, 2007, 03:16:05 pm

Guild Wars has 8 million subscribers?

I don't know, but back when I played it I loved it. It has fun content and it is updated regularly.

ZeroX · « **Reply #18 on:** April 28, 2007, 04:34:46 pm »

Starcraft 2 is being announced at the next Blizz Con.

Blaze · « **Reply #19 on:** April 28, 2007, 05:14:46 pm »

Quote from: WiReS on April 27, 2007, 11:41:53 pm

Quote from: Blaze on April 27, 2007, 10:30:55 pm
Worlds of Starcraft would be awesome, and last time I talked to someone at Blizzard about it, she said that they thought about it, but there were a lot of details they'd have to work out for it to be possible, one of them is hiring a lot more employees.
I don't see a Starcraft MMO game, it just doesn't fit the style I don't think. ;\

I'm just saying it like I heard it.

They already have a third person engine (Ghost) for it... *shrug*

Warrior · « **Reply #20 on:** April 28, 2007, 05:58:21 pm »

Quote from: OG Trust on April 28, 2007, 03:05:06 pm

Quote from: Warrior[x86] on April 28, 2007, 11:21:05 am
No, a good MMO. As in one that's actually enjoyable and filled with content, actively updated with content, and home to 8 million subscribers. That's the kind of MMORPG I'd pay for.

Guild Wars?

No. I already said a good MMORPG. That rules out GuildWars.

Joe · « **Reply #21 on:** April 28, 2007, 06:00:28 pm »

Blizzard has enough money from WoW to make everything free from now on.

Newby · « **Reply #22 on:** April 28, 2007, 06:04:50 pm »

Quote from: Joe[x86/64] on April 28, 2007, 06:00:28 pm

Blizzard has enough money from WoW to make everything free from now on.

If Blizzard makes another MMO, people will probably start switching from WoW to the new MMO. That's lost profit.

I, for one, plan to do this.

Blaze · « **Reply #23 on:** April 28, 2007, 06:05:10 pm »

Quote from: Joe[x86/64] on April 28, 2007, 06:00:28 pm

Blizzard has enough money from WoW to make everything free from now on.

Correction: Vivendi is making a lot of money from WoW. (I heard they aren't doing too well on some of their other sub-companies.. *shrug*)

ZeroX · « **Reply #24 on:** April 28, 2007, 10:35:48 pm »

The new Starcraft I believe is going to be an RTS not MMO. What they should do is make another expansion for WoW in the upcoming months.

--SPOILER---

I think the new one should have to do with Northrend and Arthas. They already introduce it since when you click out of the map from Azeroth and show outland you can see an ice cap at the top of Azeroth.

http://www.swoth.com/guides/images/outland_map_001_t.jpg

wires · « **Reply #25 on:** April 29, 2007, 10:40:26 am »

Quote from: ZeroX on April 28, 2007, 10:35:48 pm

The new Starcraft I believe is going to be an RTS not MMO. What they should do is make another expansion for WoW in the upcoming months.

--SPOILER---

I think the new one should have to do with Northrend and Arthas. They already introduce it since when you click out of the map from Azeroth and show outland you can see an ice cap at the top of Azeroth.

http://www.swoth.com/guides/images/outland_map_001_t.jpg

Just because it's on the map doesn't mean it's the next expansion...

Ender · « **Reply #26 on:** April 29, 2007, 10:51:54 am »

Quote from: ZeroX on April 28, 2007, 10:35:48 pm

The new Starcraft I believe is going to be an RTS not MMO.

My understanding is that an RTS can be an MMO... just not an MMORPG.

Warrior · « **Reply #27 on:** April 29, 2007, 11:21:20 am »

MMO usually is defined as a lot of people playing on one server at once. RTSes are split into games of smaller groups of people.

Hitmen · « **Reply #28 on:** April 29, 2007, 01:08:29 pm »

Quote from: Warrior[x86] on April 29, 2007, 11:21:20 am

MMO usually is defined as a lot of people playing on one server at once. RTSes are split into games of smaller groups of people.

But it *could* be a persistent world, with everyone playing on the same server at once! It would suck and be stupid, but it could be.

ZeroX · « **Reply #29 on:** April 29, 2007, 03:43:05 pm »

Quote from: WiReS on April 29, 2007, 10:40:26 am

Quote from: ZeroX on April 28, 2007, 10:35:48 pm
The new Starcraft I believe is going to be an RTS not MMO. What they should do is make another expansion for WoW in the upcoming months.

--SPOILER---

I think the new one should have to do with Northrend and Arthas. They already introduce it since when you click out of the map from Azeroth and show outland you can see an ice cap at the top of Azeroth.

http://www.swoth.com/guides/images/outland_map_001_t.jpg
Just because it's on the map doesn't mean it's the next expansion...

Warrior · « **Reply #30 on:** April 29, 2007, 06:54:24 pm »

Quote from: Hitmen on April 29, 2007, 01:08:29 pm

Quote from: Warrior[x86] on April 29, 2007, 11:21:20 am
MMO usually is defined as a lot of people playing on one server at once. RTSes are split into games of smaller groups of people.
But it *could* be a persistent world, with everyone playing on the same server at once! It would suck and be stupid, but it could be.

Ok? I was responding to the post where RTSes can be MMO's. The idea has been tried and tried again in concept over and over again by Game developers who think they have the latest and greatest idea.s They have all proven to be impractical or near impossible to implement in a way that the game still is fun.

iago · « **Reply #31 on:** April 29, 2007, 07:35:23 pm »

It would be interesting if somebody came up with a way to make a MMRTS work.

Sidoh · « **Reply #32 on:** April 29, 2007, 07:39:17 pm »

My friend from high school was talking about one, I'm pretty sure. I forget the name of it and how it worked, but if you're interested, I can ask him the name.

Blaze · « **Reply #33 on:** April 29, 2007, 09:13:27 pm »

The next expansion will most likely include Northrend. Also, on that image, they show the entire Azeroth Face, not just the two continents and Northrend - The rest (Undermine, etc) is just covered up by clouds.

Super_X · « **Reply #34 on:** April 29, 2007, 11:40:46 pm »

Quote from: ZeroX on April 29, 2007, 03:43:05 pm

Quote from: WiReS on April 29, 2007, 10:40:26 am
Quote from: ZeroX on April 28, 2007, 10:35:48 pm
The new Starcraft I believe is going to be an RTS not MMO. What they should do is make another expansion for WoW in the upcoming months.

--SPOILER---

I think the new one should have to do with Northrend and Arthas. They already introduce it since when you click out of the map from Azeroth and show outland you can see an ice cap at the top of Azeroth.

http://www.swoth.com/guides/images/outland_map_001_t.jpg
Just because it's on the map doesn't mean it's the next expansion...

Did you just quote something totally usless and not add anything to it?

(Kind of like what I did?)

ZeroX · « **Reply #35 on:** April 30, 2007, 12:05:49 pm »

Quote from: Super_X on April 29, 2007, 11:40:46 pm

Quote from: ZeroX on April 29, 2007, 03:43:05 pm
Quote from: WiReS on April 29, 2007, 10:40:26 am
Quote from: ZeroX on April 28, 2007, 10:35:48 pm
The new Starcraft I believe is going to be an RTS not MMO. What they should do is make another expansion for WoW in the upcoming months.

--SPOILER---

I think the new one should have to do with Northrend and Arthas. They already introduce it since when you click out of the map from Azeroth and show outland you can see an ice cap at the top of Azeroth.

http://www.swoth.com/guides/images/outland_map_001_t.jpg
Just because it's on the map doesn't mean it's the next expansion...

Did you just quote something totally usless and not add anything to it?

(Kind of like what I did?)

I was restating that I think the next one will include Arthas. He stated just becuase they show it dosent mean they will add it.

And to Blaze. I thought Undermine was the little island off the coast of Tanaris. Also Panderia is the island cluster at the top of Eastern Kingdom.

Armin · « **Reply #36 on:** April 30, 2007, 11:15:18 pm »

Quote from: Super_X on April 29, 2007, 11:40:46 pm

Quote from: ZeroX on April 29, 2007, 03:43:05 pm
Quote from: WiReS on April 29, 2007, 10:40:26 am
Quote from: ZeroX on April 28, 2007, 10:35:48 pm
The new Starcraft I believe is going to be an RTS not MMO. What they should do is make another expansion for WoW in the upcoming months.

--SPOILER---

I think the new one should have to do with Northrend and Arthas. They already introduce it since when you click out of the map from Azeroth and show outland you can see an ice cap at the top of Azeroth.

http://www.swoth.com/guides/images/outland_map_001_t.jpg
Just because it's on the map doesn't mean it's the next expansion...

Did you just quote something totally usless and not add anything to it?

(Kind of like what I did?)

He put, "I think," in bold.

Blaze · « **Reply #37 on:** May 01, 2007, 12:41:39 am »

Quote from: ZeroX on April 30, 2007, 12:05:49 pm

And to Blaze. I thought Undermine was the little island off the coast of Tanaris. Also Panderia is the island cluster at the top of Eastern Kingdom.

Undermine is located under the island "Kezan" which is south of the Maelstorm and not shown on the current WoW map.

Joe · « **Reply #38 on:** May 01, 2007, 02:00:05 am »

HOW DO YOU KNOW ALL THIS STUFF?

/mindbottle

EDIT -
ZeroX, they said you won't be able to fight Arthas until level 90. They may very well increase the cap double this time, but I'm more sure we'll have to wait for the third expansion before we fight him.

Blaze · « **Reply #39 on:** May 01, 2007, 04:12:57 pm »

Quote from: Joe[x86/64] on May 01, 2007, 02:00:05 am

HOW DO YOU KNOW ALL THIS STUFF?

/mindbottle

EDIT -
ZeroX, they said you won't be able to fight Arthas until level 90. They may very well increase the cap double this time, but I'm more sure we'll have to wait for the third expansion before we fight him.

I've read (some of) the Warcraft books, I research Wowwiki, I've watched the behind the scenes of both Warcraft and The Burning Crusade, and finally, I read everything about Warcraft in general.

No, they said you wouldn't fight Arathas as a level 70, you'd be far too weak.

ZeroX · « **Reply #40 on:** May 01, 2007, 09:16:15 pm »

Quote from: Blaze on May 01, 2007, 04:12:57 pm

Quote from: Joe[x86/64] on May 01, 2007, 02:00:05 am
HOW DO YOU KNOW ALL THIS STUFF?

/mindbottle

EDIT -
ZeroX, they said you won't be able to fight Arthas until level 90. They may very well increase the cap double this time, but I'm more sure we'll have to wait for the third expansion before we fight him.

I've read (some of) the Warcraft books, I research Wowwiki, I've watched the behind the scenes of both Warcraft and The Burning Crusade, and finally, I read everything about Warcraft in general.

No, they said you wouldn't fight Arathas as a level 70, you'd be far too weak.

Read the books. Researched WoWwiki. Never watched the behind the scenes. All I know either that the next expansion will include the Naga homeworld at the Maelstorm and we fight Queen Azshara or Northrend with Arthas.

Blaze · « **Reply #41 on:** May 03, 2007, 12:29:54 am »

Quote from: ZeroX on May 01, 2007, 09:16:15 pm

Read the books. Researched WoWwiki. Never watched the behind the scenes. All I know either that the next expansion will include the Naga homeworld at the Maelstorm and we fight Queen Azshara or Northrend with Arthas.

Okay, why do you 'know' this?

Joe · « **Reply #42 on:** May 03, 2007, 01:20:35 am »

The real debate -- what's more deadly, the Maelstrom or Arthas?

wires · « **Reply #43 on:** May 03, 2007, 07:43:59 pm »

Arthas sucks.

ZeroX · « **Reply #44 on:** May 03, 2007, 09:52:24 pm »

Quote from: Blaze on May 03, 2007, 12:29:54 am

Quote from: ZeroX on May 01, 2007, 09:16:15 pm
Read the books. Researched WoWwiki. Never watched the behind the scenes. All I know either that the next expansion will include the Naga homeworld at the Maelstorm and we fight Queen Azshara or Northrend with Arthas.

Okay, why do you 'know' this?

There is good speculation from people at wowwiki.

Blaze · « **Reply #45 on:** May 03, 2007, 11:30:45 pm »

Quote from: ZeroX on May 03, 2007, 09:52:24 pm

There is good speculation from people at wowwiki.

"There is good speculation"...
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=define%3Aspeculation (Google define: speculation)
Results: guess.

So, it is a good guess that "the next expansion will include the Naga homeworld at the Maelstorm and we fight Queen Azshara" ? Seems more like some wishful thinking to me.

Armin · « **Reply #46 on:** May 03, 2007, 11:46:13 pm »

I want to guess the next expansion will include the Emerald Dream World, mostly because I remember looking through the textures of WoW, and the Emerald Dream World was the next most developed area.

Blaze · « **Reply #47 on:** May 03, 2007, 11:55:20 pm »

Oh, the Emerald Dream has been done for at least 6 major patches... textures/developed wise. Just needs NPCs/stuff to do.

ZeroX · « **Reply #48 on:** May 05, 2007, 01:50:38 pm »

Quote from: Metal Militia on May 03, 2007, 11:46:13 pm

I want to guess the next expansion will include the Emerald Dream World, mostly because I remember looking through the textures of WoW, and the Emerald Dream World was the next most developed area.

Thats going to be patched.

cheeseisfun · « **Reply #49 on:** May 07, 2007, 12:41:15 am »

Guild Wars is a horrible game. I played it for a bit, and thought it was too much like Diablo 2. It's horrible!

I hope it turns out to be Starcraft 2, or something. That would be great!

Or I've even thought that a Starcraft FPS would be really cool, too. Something like Battlefield 1942, but with Starcraft, and on different planets, etc. And along with it being a first person shooter, it should be an MMO at the same time. Wars going on in real time, all on the same server, and in a vast world/universe. MMOFPS.

It wouldn't be like "oh dude, let's go create a melee game!" It would be like, "hey, let's go over to that one clan and shoot them up." Like to make a clan, you'd have your own piece of land, and a building that you could go into... kind of like a channel. Except this would all be in-world, like WoW. Personally I think that would be the coolest game ever. They'd get my money if they made a game like that.

Furious · « **Reply #50 on:** May 07, 2007, 10:55:18 am »

Quote from: cheeseisfun on May 07, 2007, 12:41:15 am

Guild Wars is a horrible game. I played it for a bit, and thought it was too much like Diablo 2. It's horrible!

I hope it turns out to be Starcraft 2, or something. That would be great!

Or I've even thought that a Starcraft FPS would be really cool, too. Something like Battlefield 1942, but with Starcraft, and on different planets, etc. And along with it being a first person shooter, it should be an MMO at the same time. Wars going on in real time, all on the same server, and in a vast world/universe. MMOFPS.

It wouldn't be like "oh dude, let's go create a melee game!" It would be like, "hey, let's go over to that one clan and shoot them up." Like to make a clan, you'd have your own piece of land, and a building that you could go into... kind of like a channel. Except this would all be in-world, like WoW. Personally I think that would be the coolest game ever. They'd get my money if they made a game like that.

+1

That shit would be hot.

AntiVirus · « **Reply #51 on:** May 07, 2007, 11:31:05 am »

Quote from: Furious on May 07, 2007, 10:55:18 am

Quote from: cheeseisfun on May 07, 2007, 12:41:15 am
Guild Wars is a horrible game. I played it for a bit, and thought it was too much like Diablo 2. It's horrible!

I hope it turns out to be Starcraft 2, or something. That would be great!

Or I've even thought that a Starcraft FPS would be really cool, too. Something like Battlefield 1942, but with Starcraft, and on different planets, etc. And along with it being a first person shooter, it should be an MMO at the same time. Wars going on in real time, all on the same server, and in a vast world/universe. MMOFPS.

It wouldn't be like "oh dude, let's go create a melee game!" It would be like, "hey, let's go over to that one clan and shoot them up." Like to make a clan, you'd have your own piece of land, and a building that you could go into... kind of like a channel. Except this would all be in-world, like WoW. Personally I think that would be the coolest game ever. They'd get my money if they made a game like that.

+1

That shit would be hot.

QFT

I think OGame is a RTT(text based) MMO, but I don't actually play it so I am not sure.

Armin · « **Reply #52 on:** May 07, 2007, 12:53:12 pm »

Eh, that sounds like it'd be impossible for the casual gamer to have a good time...

iago · « **Reply #53 on:** May 07, 2007, 02:38:36 pm »

Quote from: Metal Militia on May 07, 2007, 12:53:12 pm

Eh, that sounds like it'd be impossible for the casual gamer to have a good time...

Agreed. That would only work well if either a) You were online (or on-call, with a pager) 24/7, or b) If there were assigned times when everybody can play (has to play, even).

ZeroX · « **Reply #54 on:** May 07, 2007, 06:30:52 pm »

Quote from: iago on May 07, 2007, 02:38:36 pm

Quote from: Metal Militia on May 07, 2007, 12:53:12 pm
Eh, that sounds like it'd be impossible for the casual gamer to have a good time...
Agreed. That would only work well if either a) You were online (or on-call, with a pager) 24/7, or b) If there were assigned times when everybody can play (has to play, even).

They could set up differnt time zones and have Netural places that you can go upgrade your weapon and buy more ammo at. But that be too much like an MMORPG and not FPS.

Warrior · « **Reply #55 on:** May 07, 2007, 06:35:10 pm »

It'd be an MMOFPS. The concept of an MMOFPS is good, it's just lacking proper implementation.

disco · « **Reply #56 on:** May 09, 2007, 12:18:21 pm »

It would be cool if they made something like a combination of rts and fps. Like how war3 had way more usage of heros, maybe they could do the same with sc2. You could switch between playing like a normal rts or build a hero and go into first person mode.

rabbit · « **Reply #57 on:** May 09, 2007, 07:59:33 pm »

No. Heroes should not appear in an RTS at all, except in campaign mode where they are usually a mission.

Sidoh · « **Reply #58 on:** May 09, 2007, 10:00:25 pm »

Why not? To be honest, I think it makes the game more interesting.

Hitmen · « **Reply #59 on:** May 10, 2007, 07:41:50 am »

Quote from: rabbit on May 09, 2007, 07:59:33 pm

No. Heroes should not appear in an RTS at all, except in campaign mode where they are usually a mission.

<3

I hate heroes.

iago · « **Reply #60 on:** May 10, 2007, 10:07:04 am »

Quote from: Hitmen on May 10, 2007, 07:41:50 am

Quote from: rabbit on May 09, 2007, 07:59:33 pm
No. Heroes should not appear in an RTS at all, except in campaign mode where they are usually a mission.

<3

I hate heroes.

Agreed. It's an awful television show.

haha! But seriously, that's one of the main reasons I didn't like War3 (besides the 3d aspect.. I never liked that in RTS). I can't really explain why, but I just think that they add too much complication.

Starcraft heroes are the way to go, in my opinion. Characters that are important to the campaign that follow you through.

Hitmen · « **Reply #61 on:** May 10, 2007, 07:31:51 pm »

Quote from: iago on May 10, 2007, 10:07:04 am

(besides the 3d aspect.. I never liked that in RTS)

Well, at least I'm not alone in that part either. I think that the UI and how you interact with a game are the single most important part of making a good game, as that's usually why I end up not enjoying games. For example, I've always liked the games in the command an conquer seiries, I started playing the first game in 1995 when I was like seven... I like all of them up through red alert 2, but since C&C generals and now C&C 3 came out, I haven't been able to really enjoy them. It's not that they're bad games, but I just hate the UI and the 3D look/feel that it's enough to keep me from enjoying it. And it's not just RTS games either... the Fallout games are some of my favorite games of all time, but one of the reasons I like it so much is because of how the game feels to play it, it's just something I've never found in another game. So yeah, I'm not sure if I would be able to play a 3D starcaft and enjoy it like the other one, or a 3d diablo type game for that matter.

Warrior · « **Reply #62 on:** May 10, 2007, 07:38:14 pm »

Warcraft 3 was done well, if a Starcraft RTS is like that I'd play it.

Armin · « **Reply #63 on:** May 10, 2007, 08:10:10 pm »

Quote from: Hitmen on May 10, 2007, 07:31:51 pm

Quote from: iago on May 10, 2007, 10:07:04 am
(besides the 3d aspect.. I never liked that in RTS)

Well, at least I'm not alone in that part either. I think that the UI and how you interact with a game are the single most important part of making a good game, as that's usually why I end up not enjoying games. For example, I've always liked the games in the command an conquer seiries, I started playing the first game in 1995 when I was like seven... I like all of them up through red alert 2, but since C&C generals and now C&C 3 came out, I haven't been able to really enjoy them. It's not that they're bad games, but I just hate the UI and the 3D look/feel that it's enough to keep me from enjoying it. And it's not just RTS games either... the Fallout games are some of my favorite games of all time, but one of the reasons I like it so much is because of how the game feels to play it, it's just something I've never found in another game. So yeah, I'm not sure if I would be able to play a 3D starcaft and enjoy it like the other one, or a 3d diablo type game for that matter.

100% agreed. I think a 3D RTS can be done, but will be hard to achieve.

News:

Author Topic: New MMO from Blizzard? (Read 15843 times)

trust

trust

trust