Author Topic: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?  (Read 7470 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
« Reply #15 on: June 07, 2007, 05:10:58 pm »
No, withdrawal, which rarely works.
Yeah, withdrawal does absolutely nothing to prevent STDs (AIDS, et al) and doesn't always prevent pregnancy, either.

Of course, this is the reason that "Abstinence-only" teaching is bad, and that kids should be taught this kind of stuff.

Offline CrAz3D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10184
    • View Profile
Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
« Reply #16 on: June 07, 2007, 05:21:52 pm »
Clearly it didn't work for Joe...
Maybe Joe just missed that part of highschool, since he dropped out and all

</being a douche to Joe, <3  >

Offline psychspy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
« Reply #17 on: June 14, 2007, 05:29:09 am »
She won't get pregnant, and she won't get your STDs... if you kill her.  Muhahahahaha ^^