Facebook killed the radio star. And by radio star, I mean the premise of distributed forums around the internet. And that got got by Instagram/SnapChat. And that got got by TikTok. Where the fuck is the internet we once knew?
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
I'm not though. Just because I don't like wasting my time on stupid-not-even-funny things doesn't mean I am sheltered.
That aside, I don't really think this video fits the definition of "stupid."
(22:15:39) Newby: it hurts to swallow
Quote from: AntiVirus on June 13, 2007, 02:32:27 pmI'm not though. Just because I don't like wasting my time on stupid-not-even-funny things doesn't mean I am sheltered.I hate that defense. "Just because I don't waste my time on <X>, doesn't mean that I'm <Y>." It's so silly.You've never seen an episode of jackass?That aside, I don't really think this video fits the definition of "stupid."
I dunno about that, this is pretty stupid. Not as stupid as the 'ghost that causes car crash' movie someone posted, but pretty fucking stupid none the less.
I don't care if you hate that defense or not, it's a valid defense and to say differently is silly IMO. And yes, I have seen about 1 or 2 episodes of jackass and I saw the movie (went with friends). Jackass is pretty stupid, but atleast it has *some* humour to it and entertainment value, unlike this. I don't watch Jackass, the only time I see it is if a friend is watching it and I just happen to be over at their place.I'm glad that you don't think it fits the definition of stupid, but I do.
Quote from: Hitmen on June 13, 2007, 02:42:42 pmI dunno about that, this is pretty stupid. Not as stupid as the 'ghost that causes car crash' movie someone posted, but pretty fucking stupid none the less.I don't agree, considering one of the two experts who's opinions I valued most was "undecided," I don't think that it is stupid.Quote from: AntiVirus on June 13, 2007, 02:44:26 pmI don't care if you hate that defense or not, it's a valid defense and to say differently is silly IMO. And yes, I have seen about 1 or 2 episodes of jackass and I saw the movie (went with friends). Jackass is pretty stupid, but atleast it has *some* humour to it and entertainment value, unlike this. I don't watch Jackass, the only time I see it is if a friend is watching it and I just happen to be over at their place.I'm glad that you don't think it fits the definition of stupid, but I do.The reason I don't like it is because it annoys me when people say doing something is a waste of time in an object manner. I could think up a number of reasons that watching stupid things isn't a waste of time (I obviously don't think that this is always true). For starters, observing the stupid enlightens the ignorant.You're misusing "stupid." I think you should be saying "boring" or "pointless." A movie isn't "stupid" because it lacks entertainment or humor (you're not Canadian! ). A documentary on a particle accelerator may be boring for some people, but I definitely don't think they could validly argue that it's stupid.
I think you're just being pedantic.
You'd get marked off on a paper here for spelling it humour, I'm pretty sure.
Quote from: Hitmen on June 13, 2007, 03:06:21 pmI think you're just being pedantic. There are certain things I'm very picky about. One is exaggerating and saying things like "that was the stupidest thing I've ever seen," which is what started me going.
It includes several colloquial definitions.
In college, really? I haven't had to write many papers that included this specific word, but I would think that a University that accepts students from all over the world wouldn't take points off for spelling it the Canadian way. That'd be stupid IMO, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't happen.
You'll get over it.
You shouldn't ignore those definitions since those are the ones that usually change our formal langauge. However, if you were writing something formal you shouldn't use those, but eventually those colloquial definitions will become formal. The language is forever evolving.
I'm pretty sure you'd get marked off on a paper here for spelling it "humor". Of course, that practically defines "objective"
Quote from: AntiVirus on June 13, 2007, 03:09:45 pmYou shouldn't ignore those definitions since those are the ones that usually change our formal langauge. However, if you were writing something formal you shouldn't use those, but eventually those colloquial definitions will become formal. The language is forever evolving.I'm tempted to copy/paste the captain obvious picture. I don't ignore colloquial definitions. I just tend to avoid referencing them because they are just that: informal.
The only reason I said that was to make sure you knew. Sometimes I wonder if it's obvious for you.