Author Topic: lockdown source  (Read 11060 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: lockdown source
« Reply #15 on: August 05, 2007, 11:55:39 pm »
Using too much memory? In java? How absurd!
Java doesn't use a lot of memory unless you're using a graphical interface, such as Swing. But console Java doesn't use much more memory than equivalent languages.

I forget -- is Java interpreted or JIT compiled?
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: lockdown source
« Reply #16 on: August 06, 2007, 12:19:14 am »
Interpreted :\

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: lockdown source
« Reply #17 on: August 06, 2007, 12:28:34 am »
Both.

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: lockdown source
« Reply #18 on: August 06, 2007, 09:50:21 pm »
Java doesn't use a lot of memory unless you're using a graphical interface, such as Swing. But console Java doesn't use much more memory than equivalent languages.
Java actually uses less memory than equivalent web languages in the web server context (at least compared to CGI and ASP.NET, I can't compare to PHP since I haven't used it significantly).  One VM with many processes is significantly more efficient than a single process for every session.

Offline Warrior

  • supreme mac daddy of trolls
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7503
  • One for a Dime two for a Quarter!
    • View Profile
Re: lockdown source
« Reply #19 on: August 07, 2007, 12:56:40 am »
Java doesn't use a lot of memory unless you're using a graphical interface, such as Swing. But console Java doesn't use much more memory than equivalent languages.
Java actually uses less memory than equivalent web languages in the web server context (at least compared to CGI and ASP.NET, I can't compare to PHP since I haven't used it significantly).  One VM with many processes is significantly more efficient than a single process for every session.

At least in the context of web progreamming, I'd say that for ASP .NET you trade memory consumption for functionality. In my opinion, the tools you get to work with in ASP .NET are also far superior to any offering I've seen for Java.

One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Offline warz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1134
    • View Profile
    • chyea.org
Re: lockdown source
« Reply #20 on: August 08, 2007, 05:26:02 pm »
http://dan.corlan.net/bench.html

Although, I'm not sure how accurate, or current that is. I seem to remember seeing one that ranked Python fairly high on the charts. Python is also at version 2.5, and not 2.1 anymore (lol). I seem to remember Python ranking faster than Java, and PHP being the slowest of the three.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2007, 05:27:52 pm by warz »
http://www.chyea.org/ - web based markup debugger

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: lockdown source
« Reply #21 on: August 27, 2007, 10:20:11 pm »
Bad link
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline warz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1134
    • View Profile
    • chyea.org
Re: lockdown source
« Reply #22 on: August 28, 2007, 09:50:55 am »
ah, lame - it worked on the 8th, i swear! :p
http://www.chyea.org/ - web based markup debugger

Offline Chavo

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • no u
    • View Profile
    • Chavoland
Re: lockdown source
« Reply #23 on: August 28, 2007, 01:17:13 pm »
Worked then and still works for me.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: lockdown source
« Reply #24 on: August 28, 2007, 01:21:00 pm »
Yeah, it's working for me again (wasn't earlier). What kind of loser runs a server that isn't on 24/7? :)