Clan x86

General Forums => Introductions! => Topic started by: c0n on August 30, 2005, 04:02:50 am

Title: i am me
Post by: c0n on August 30, 2005, 04:02:50 am
hi im c0n. aka c0nthem0n.
if you dont like me then i LOL @ u

while(c0n > y0u)
      LOL();


LOL

i will fork() bomb you lolololol
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: iago on August 30, 2005, 03:01:49 pm
I tried that, but your loop never runs....
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: deadly7 on August 30, 2005, 09:31:48 pm
Don't you have to specify c0n and y0u and LOL?
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: AntiVirus on August 30, 2005, 11:30:55 pm
Lmao, I think it was suppose to be a little joke. :) 

Sheesh, people taking things to literally!!   :D
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: Newby on August 30, 2005, 11:36:14 pm
I will spoon() bomb you lolol.
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: c0n on August 30, 2005, 11:49:48 pm
I will spoon() bomb you lolol.

hahaha.

Don't you have to specify c0n and y0u and LOL?

it's all implied.

I tried that, but your loop never runs....

just specify c0n as God, and God as the highest number possible, and y0u as the lowest. then it should run fine. then setup the function LOL(); to just printf("LOL\n"); a bunch. then there you go. loop wurkz perfektly
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: Blaze on August 31, 2005, 12:12:07 am
*snaps fingers*
Code: [Select]
#include <stdio.h>

int c0n = 1;
int y0u = 0;

int LOL()
{
    printf("LOL!\n");
    return 0;
}

int main()
{
   while(c0n > y0u)
   {
       LOL();
   }
   return 0;
}

Untested but should work code.
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: Newby on August 31, 2005, 12:15:36 am
void LOL() is better. That way you're not returning an integer to nothing!
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: Blaze on August 31, 2005, 12:20:10 am
I wasn't sure if C supported that... *shrug*
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: c0n on August 31, 2005, 01:46:12 am
*snaps fingers*
Code: [Select]
#include <stdio.h>

int c0n = 1;
int y0u = 0;

int LOL()
{
    prinft("LOL!\n");
    return 0;
}

int main()
{
   while(c0n > y0u)
   {
       LOL();
   }
   return 0;
}

Untested but should work code.


Hmm, you don't need to put bracers if there's only one instruction.

let me fix this up the eleet way.

Code: [Select]
#include <stdio.h>

int c0n = 31337;
int y0u = 0;

int LOL()
{
    printf("LOL! c0n 0wnz yu0\n");
    return 0;
}

int main()
{
   while(c0n > y0u)
       LOL();

   return (c0n == 31337);  // WILL ALWAYS RETURN TRUE LOL
}

there. the code is now elite.
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: Blaze on August 31, 2005, 02:05:51 am
Its my way of doing things, and it helps me keep trac off what code goes in what loop/if/else/ect.

btw, I mistyped 'printf'
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: ZeroX on August 31, 2005, 10:00:58 am
unban me from clan zer0 fag  :o
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: c0n on August 31, 2005, 12:19:29 pm
Its my way of doing things, and it helps me keep trac off what code goes in what loop/if/else/ect.

btw, I mistyped 'printf'

haha, you're right. i didnt notice that. it has been el fix-o'd
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: trust on August 31, 2005, 06:15:52 pm
I put braces around 1 line code blocks as well, it keeps things imho more organized. :\
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: c0n on September 01, 2005, 04:35:32 pm
I put braces around 1 line code blocks as well, it keeps things imho more organized. :\

except it makes ur code look more newbish

too many bracers and your code starts looking really gay like:

if(blah)
{
    blah;
}
else
{
    blah;
}

in my HUMBLE opini0n, this looks c00ler:

if(blah)
    blah;
else
    blah;

it makes it more compact and is more ejeet
Title: Re: i am me
Post by: Joe on September 02, 2005, 06:36:22 pm
WTF JAVA PORT LOLOL

public class Main {
  int joe = 31337;
  int c0n = 0;
 
  public static void main(string args[]) {
     while(joe > c0n) {
         LOL();
     }
  }
 
  public static void LOL() {
    System.out.println("LOL! joe 0wnz y0u")l
  }
}