31
General Discussion / Re: women and govt shutdown
« on: October 17, 2013, 04:54:10 pm »
Women voting men into power isn't equivalent to women actually running the government.
Facebook killed the radio star. And by radio star, I mean the premise of distributed forums around the internet. And that got got by Instagram/SnapChat. And that got got by TikTok. Where the fuck is the internet we once knew?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
[right]...[/right]
Quoting posts appears to be broken for me..
How could I forget, Ramanujan is also a good example of a genius with little university experience. He also possessed abilities that almost no person has. His abilities and use of these make him a genius (he's one of the handful per century).
Yes, I think we have similar intuitive definitions of 'genius'. I think the word 'genius' is probably thrown around a bit too loosely. To me it means someone with exceptional (e.g. 1 in 10 million) cognitive abilities. Of course, the specific cognitive abilities in question could vary. It would be hard to have more than an intuitive definition of the word 'genius'.
But I don't think Bill Gates would qualify by my definition. He is talented, and smart, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were loads of people with similar abilities in silicon valley.
I don't think Bill Gates or Elon Musk are geniuses. But I do think Tesla would serve as a better example. He had no university education at all and made huge discoveries in E&M. Tesla is indubitably a genius.I'd still bet money on the C students being mostly just lackluster students.
Yes, I'd agree. But on the other hand, it might also be a reasonable bet that most geniuses receive poor grades. Certainly a surprising number do.
The most industrious geniuses probably don't waste time earning grades (good or bad) as soon as they see an opportunity. Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard, Elon Musk dropped out of a PhD program at Stanford two days after he started, and so on.
EDIT:
Oh apparently I'm wrong. He studied for at least two years.
I'd still bet money on the C students being mostly just lackluster students.
Yes, I'd agree. But on the other hand, it might also be a reasonable bet that most geniuses receive poor grades. Certainly a surprising number do.
Google is an advertising company.
A rather extreme analogy, but when's the last time you got some spam mail (snail mail) for loan X or gift reward Y and went totally bonkers over it and bought into it?
This is how I see Google, only Google is quite brilliant and makes genuinely awesome contributions to technology ... at the cost of our privacy (because most of what they give us is free). Just remember what you're giving ...
And Chromecast sounds like Google's clever way to know what we're watching (and it's a cool device from what I hear). I won't touch it with a 10 foot poll ... I'd rather go with a competitor (like Roku).
Chromecast sounds like suck (1) because no netflix; (2) lack of processing power because lack of standalone power source; and (3) other reasons?
People are still people, yes, but I'm arguing that they are less deserving of the finite resources available. As for the "victims of society" notion, while I agree it happens, but I can't see it as a strong enough mitigating factor to not execute/imprison/whatever someone.
Those in for life/on death row...I kinda don't understand, from an economic and, to an extent, moral viewpoint, why we care about them. They're too bad to be in society (and usually too bad to be in gen pop), so they're in solitary indefinitely. That shit messes people up, but there isn't really an alternative. Killing them all might be the kindest and least cruel thing to do, IMO.