Clan x86
Technical (Development, Security, etc.) => Graphics => Topic started by: Tuberload on July 17, 2005, 06:26:38 pm
-
... crap.
That's right this sucks. Just wanted to show the first creation in my on going brushing experience.. I will add things from time to time. Hopefully I will get better. :)
http://67.185.36.85/images/Celestial_1.gif
-
Well here is the next evolution of my series:
http://67.185.36.85/images/CELESTIAL_2.png
I think it's 100% better than the first, but still nothing special.
-
I like them both, actually. They are quite good I think. I kind of like how you have opacity set up, it looks like clouds. Very good.
-
I don't much like the first one, but the second looks really neat.
You should make some things that look that cool that are more suitable for a desktop. :)
-
I like the first better... :-\
-
Your newest piece of crap owns the best image I've ever made. :\
-
I don't much like the first one, but the second looks really neat.
You should make some things that look that cool that are more suitable for a desktop. :)
What resolution do you prefer? I will make one that size in time.
-
Your newest piece of crap owns the best image I've ever made. :\
I am fairly happy with the new one. There is still a lot wrong with it but it didn't turn out to bad. Thanks.
-
I like them both, actually. They are quite good I think. I kind of like how you have opacity set up, it looks like clouds. Very good.
Thank you.
It background cointains a lot of soft brushes of various size, color, opacity, and flow rate. The foreground is a varying texturized brush. I also used the smudge tool quite a bit. I am slowely starting to learn.
-
I like the first better... :-\
Hey, whatever tickles your pickle. :o
-
Tubby, what's your AIM? I have some good abstract+cloud brushes you might like for this piece.
-
Tubby, what's your AIM? I have some good abstract+cloud brushes you might like for this piece.
My AIM is Tuberload.
-
Why do you post more than once in a row, Tuberload? :)
1280x1024 would be optimal for me, but any resolution that can be resized to that without any or much distortion would be great too. :)
And yes, I like the second one a considerable amount more as well. :)
-
Wow Tubby, if you resize the second one mind posting it here? I like it.
-
Wow Tubby, if you resize the second one mind posting it here? I like it.
I am going to start another one here soon and I will make it large enough that I can down size it to fit most peoples resolutions. What size do you prefer?
-
Why do you post more than once in a row, Tuberload? :)
1280x1024 would be optimal for me, but any resolution that can be resized to that without any or much distortion would be great too. :)
And yes, I like the second one a considerable amount more as well. :)
I have always posted seperately if I am talking to different people. I guess it just keeps my conversations seperated.
I'll keep you updated on the next time around. I don't think this image would look to good upsized that much.
-
Wow Tubby, if you resize the second one mind posting it here? I like it.
I am going to start another one here soon and I will make it large enough that I can down size it to fit most peoples resolutions. What size do you prefer?
Awesome. :)
-
1024x768 plz :)
-
1600x900 plz :)
-
1024x768. =)
-
My motivation levels have gone back down to an all time low as far as my interest in computers are concerned. It may be a little while before I finish another piece of art like this, but when I do I plan on mixing a lot more techniques that I have learned and make a more elaborate celestial scene. I should be able to produce a copy in all resolutions but Joe's and possible Sidohs because I am unfortunately not rich enough to own a computer that is fast enough to handle such a large image without pissing me off to the point of throwing it out the window, sorry.
-
I don't know how many of us use LCD's, but 1208x1024 is native resolution (as I'm sure you know) for almost all LCD monitors. :)
I really doubt you care, and the one I'm using now is 1204x768 anyway. :)