Clan x86
General Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: AntiVirus on July 17, 2006, 02:41:46 pm
-
For everything there is an equal and opposing force. For good there is evil. That's how sin came to be. It's the only way balance is maintained.
-
For everything there is an equal and opposing force. For good there is evil. That's how sin came to be. It's the only way balance is maintained.
Conscious or morals don't exert a physical force. Therefore, Newton's laws don't apply to them. I don't understand why those types of analogies or relations are made. :\
-
Evil only exists because we have a concept of Good. If there was no Evil, there would only be Neutral. Anyway, Good and Evil aren't balanced. If they were, there'd be more people like Hitler.
-
Evil only exists because we have a concept of Good. If there was no Evil, there would only be Neutral. Anyway, Good and Evil aren't balanced. If they were, there'd be more people like Hitler.
'Good' and 'evil' are also relative and subjective terms. There is nothing objective about either of them, so it's extremely difficult to apply them to any sort of logical set of mathematical rules, such as Newton's laws.
-
This is a good conversation but doesn't apply to the rules, so.. split.
-
::)
-
Evil only exists because we have a concept of Good. If there was no Evil, there would only be Neutral. Anyway, Good and Evil aren't balanced. If they were, there'd be more people like Hitler.
You're right, evil totally outbalances good.
-
You're right, evil totally outbalances good.
That completely depends on your point of view and what you believe to be good and what you believe to be evil.
Like I already said, making objective statements (like that) on subjective issues (like this) is pretty useless. If someone disagrees, there's no real way you can convince them to adopt your oppinion.
-
You're right, evil totally outbalances good.
That completely depends on your point of view and what you believe to be good and what you believe to be evil.
Like I already said, making objective statements (like that) on subjective issues (like this) is pretty useless. If someone disagrees, there's no real way you can convince them to adopt your oppinion.
Argh, it was a joke, silly.
I was hinting that Hitler = good.
-
Argh, it was a joke, silly.
I was hinting that Hitler = good.
::)
-
::)
WTF @ FACE?!
::)
ARGH!
-
QQ (jk :-*)