Clan x86

General Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: Armin on May 04, 2009, 11:52:56 am

Title: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: Armin on May 04, 2009, 11:52:56 am
Which do you prefer, and why?
Title: Re: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: Joe on May 04, 2009, 12:35:24 pm
RhythmBox.

But I liked Foobar over Winamp. Winamp crashed and burned my entire library once. Eh.
Title: Re: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: warz on May 04, 2009, 12:54:36 pm
I haven't used Winamp in years. I used to use it all the time, though. About the time they introduced the version that played videos was when I stopped using it.
Title: Re: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: truste1 on May 04, 2009, 01:49:03 pm
I used Winamp a lot but now I just use iTunes. Didn't really like Foobar though the few times I used it.
Title: Re: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: rabbit on May 04, 2009, 02:17:44 pm
I still use winamp, and love it.
Title: Re: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: Hitmen on May 04, 2009, 02:42:18 pm
I've used winamp for like 10000 years but started playing with foobar lately. It can take some effort to set up but it's pretty hot:

(http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/1906/foobar.png)

Fast and lightweight even with a huge library. (using like 4mb of ram when playing in the background)

Winamp is easier to just play a couple files in but I'm starting to like foobar a lot more for having all my music in it.
Title: Re: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: Newby on May 04, 2009, 03:06:58 pm
On OS X, I'm just using iTunes. :P

That's a pretty Foobar, btw.
Title: Re: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: Towelie on May 04, 2009, 04:49:19 pm
I've used winamp for like 10000 years but started playing with foobar lately. It can take some effort to set up but it's pretty hot:

(http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/1906/foobar.png)

Fast and lightweight even with a huge library. (using like 4mb of ram when playing in the background)

Winamp is easier to just play a couple files in but I'm starting to like foobar a lot more for having all my music in it.
This has inspired me to listen to Artillery ;P
Title: Re: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: Blaze on May 04, 2009, 05:29:53 pm
Downloading foobar now.  I hate iTunes, way too bulky/slow.
Title: Re: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: Camel on May 05, 2009, 01:50:12 pm
I've been using fb2k for years, never looked back.
Title: Re: Foobar vs Winamp
Post by: leet_muffin on May 05, 2009, 04:25:05 pm
Artillery is the shit.