Poll
Question:
Should iago stop un-stickying my polls?
Option 1: Of course! Members' rights!
votes: 7
Option 2: Depends.
votes: 1
Option 3: Huh?
votes: 1
Option 4: Is this about "Othello"?
votes: 1
Option 5: All I heard was "iago sticky my pole."
votes: 11
The subject says it all. If you haven't kept up, iago went against member rights and un-stickied what could be the most important poll of our time (http://www.x86labs.org/forum/index.php/topic,11388.0.html). He needs to hear from the community!!!
Sidoh, can you get on that mod I requested, to automatically unsticky moved threads?
Quote from: iago on February 27, 2008, 07:52:13 AM
Sidoh, can you get on that mod I requested, to automatically unsticky moved threads?
Yeah, I didn't sticky and move the thread. :P
Then somebody needs to fix some permissions. *pokes Sidoh*
I totally stickied it due to the seriousness of the topic.
Quote from: iago on February 27, 2008, 07:52:13 AM
Sidoh, can you get on that mod I requested, to automatically unsticky moved threads?
In response to this, I might look at it when I get time. I'm having a really busy week and SMF's source is frustratingly sloppy.
Oh yeah? Interestingly enough, that's not a half-bad idea. BUT -- x86 started as a battle.net clan, and this was just the forum of the members. Even though the battle.net aspect no longer exists, this is still technically the forum of it's members (and friends.)
Quote from: Krazed on March 03, 2008, 04:42:49 PM
Oh yeah? Interestingly enough, that's not a half-bad idea. BUT -- x86 started as a battle.net clan, and this was just the forum of the members. Even though the battle.net aspect no longer exists, this is still technically the forum of it's members (and friends.)
I don't think everyone quit playing Blizzard games they just went from Battle net to WoW.
Quote from: GS2xx on March 03, 2008, 04:54:10 PM
Quote from: Krazed on March 03, 2008, 04:42:49 PM
Oh yeah? Interestingly enough, that's not a half-bad idea. BUT -- x86 started as a battle.net clan, and this was just the forum of the members. Even though the battle.net aspect no longer exists, this is still technically the forum of it's members (and friends.)
I don't think everyone quit playing Blizzard games they just went from Battle net to WoW.
... you're right... because WoW is a Blizzard game.
Quote from: GS2xx on March 03, 2008, 04:54:10 PM
Quote from: Krazed on March 03, 2008, 04:42:49 PM
Oh yeah? Interestingly enough, that's not a half-bad idea. BUT -- x86 started as a battle.net clan, and this was just the forum of the members. Even though the battle.net aspect no longer exists, this is still technically the forum of it's members (and friends.)
I don't think everyone quit playing Blizzard games they just went from Battle net to WoW.
That's not even what he said.
I like the idea of anarchy, but then it wouldn't be the clan anymore. Plus, anarchy requires maturity, which isn't something I expect around here.
Quote from: GS2xx on March 03, 2008, 04:54:10 PM
Quote from: Krazed on March 03, 2008, 04:42:49 PM
Oh yeah? Interestingly enough, that's not a half-bad idea. BUT -- x86 started as a battle.net clan, and this was just the forum of the members. Even though the battle.net aspect no longer exists, this is still technically the forum of it's members (and friends.)
I don't think everyone quit playing Blizzard games they just went from Battle net to WoW.
Uhh, what? I didn't say anything about quitting blizzard games. I said the battle.net aspect [of x86] no longer exists.
Quote from: iago on March 03, 2008, 04:58:55 PM
I like the idea of anarchy, but then it wouldn't be the clan anymore. Plus, anarchy requires maturity, which isn't something I expect around here.
Technically, it wouldn't be anarchy. The moderators would be moderators, the administrators would be administrators. So in the end, you (along with Sidoh, Blaze, and Newby.) would have a lot more control over the maturity level, without dealing with any type of member backlash. :P
Quote from: Krazed on March 03, 2008, 05:01:43 PM
Quote from: iago on March 03, 2008, 04:58:55 PM
I like the idea of anarchy, but then it wouldn't be the clan anymore. Plus, anarchy requires maturity, which isn't something I expect around here.
Technically, it wouldn't be anarchy. The moderators would be moderators, the administrators would be administrators. So in the end, you (along with Sidoh, Blaze, and Newby.) would have a lot more control over the maturity level, without dealing with any type of member backlash. :P
Ah, so it's like socialism but with corrupt leaders? Sounds to me like...... communism!
Quote from: iago on March 03, 2008, 05:02:56 PM
Quote from: Krazed on March 03, 2008, 05:01:43 PM
Quote from: iago on March 03, 2008, 04:58:55 PM
I like the idea of anarchy, but then it wouldn't be the clan anymore. Plus, anarchy requires maturity, which isn't something I expect around here.
Technically, it wouldn't be anarchy. The moderators would be moderators, the administrators would be administrators. So in the end, you (along with Sidoh, Blaze, and Newby.) would have a lot more control over the maturity level, without dealing with any type of member backlash. :P
Ah, so it's like socialism but with corrupt leaders? Sounds to me like...... communism!
Exactly!
Quote from: iago on March 03, 2008, 05:02:56 PM
Ah, so it's like socialism but with corrupt leaders? Sounds to me like...... communism!
And you're our beloved Stalin, you big canuck, you.