Clan x86

Off topic/Crap => Trash Can => Topic started by: Rule on July 09, 2008, 05:53:39 PM

Title: Re: Abortion ethics dilema
Post by: Rule on July 09, 2008, 05:53:39 PM
Quote from: MyndFyre on July 09, 2008, 05:34:54 PM
Quote from: Rule on July 09, 2008, 03:35:11 PM
I'm still waiting for someone to comment on the posts Ender and I made in response to Myndfyre.  It seems whenever a good point is made, it is ignored or not acknowledged by the other side, and then the discussion is derailed with irrelevant nonsense by people like Crazed, and then the other side picks up on the irrelevant nonsense and resumes posting.

I have a job and I can't always post a thoughtful, thorough reply.  This is one of those instances.  When I can post one, you'll see it.

Cut the passive aggressive garbage.  I have a job too.  And you're pretty much completely cornered in this argument.  I don't think you have the strength of character to admit it though.  I don't think you have the strength of character to do anything but to continue to find rationalisations to support an initial position you have.


Title: Re: Abortion ethics dilema
Post by: CrAz3D on July 09, 2008, 06:26:06 PM
oooooh, you think he's blowing you off so you're rationaliZing it by saying he is passive aggressive!
Title: Re: Abortion ethics dilema
Post by: iago on July 09, 2008, 06:51:05 PM
Quote from: Rule on July 09, 2008, 05:53:39 PM
Quote from: MyndFyre on July 09, 2008, 05:34:54 PM
Quote from: Rule on July 09, 2008, 03:35:11 PM
I'm still waiting for someone to comment on the posts Ender and I made in response to Myndfyre.  It seems whenever a good point is made, it is ignored or not acknowledged by the other side, and then the discussion is derailed with irrelevant nonsense by people like Crazed, and then the other side picks up on the irrelevant nonsense and resumes posting.

I have a job and I can't always post a thoughtful, thorough reply.  This is one of those instances.  When I can post one, you'll see it.

Cut the passive aggressive garbage.  I have a job too.  And you're pretty much completely cornered in this argument.  I don't think you have the strength of character to admit it though.  I don't think you have the strength of character to do anything but to continue to find rationalisations to support an initial position you have.




Needlessly harsh, IMO.