Text only | Text with Images

Clan x86

General Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: Newby on May 04, 2005, 08:08:52 PM

Title: [split] Other Chat Mediums
Post by: Newby on May 04, 2005, 08:08:52 PM
Neither will be hard.

Counter-Strike 2 != Counter-Strike. If they release a Counter-Strike 2 we are half way there.

Blizzard will eventuelly fold. Just look at Interplay.

The same company that brought you Carmageddon, Fallout, Baldur's Gate, Descent series, etc, died. I saw their stocks a few hours before they died. They weren't even worth a penny.
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: rabbit on May 05, 2005, 02:27:26 PM
If Blizzard dies and x86 was still around I assume it'd move to Liquid Chat Network :D? (or IRC, but LCN > IRC)
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: Warrior on May 05, 2005, 03:55:08 PM
God, show me LCN
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: rabbit on May 05, 2005, 06:20:35 PM
OK!
QuoteLiquid Chat Network Server v0.1.2
Created on Mar 17, 2005 by Spencer Ragen (R.a.B.B.i.T)
(C)Copyright R.a.B.B.i.T Software 2005. All rights reserved.

Creating server socket...
Server listen port set to 9876
Socket created (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:9876).
Server listening...
Connection from /127.0.0.1:1444
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: Krazed on May 05, 2005, 10:00:02 PM
To IRC we go. Forever...

Then in like 3 years, we'll all be like.. Wow, repping x86. :)
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: Joe on May 05, 2005, 10:21:42 PM
GBN.
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: Warrior on May 05, 2005, 10:47:10 PM
Hah!
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: Blaze on May 06, 2005, 07:13:41 PM
Blizzard won't go under for a while if those WoW subscriptions keep..
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: rabbit on May 06, 2005, 08:42:27 PM
Battle.Net might.
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: Newby on May 07, 2005, 04:12:35 PM
IRC!
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: rabbit on May 07, 2005, 05:19:25 PM
LCN!
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: Joe on May 09, 2005, 09:02:23 PM
GBN!
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: Joe on May 09, 2005, 09:04:10 PM
BotNet!
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: rabbit on May 10, 2005, 05:26:37 PM
BotNet sucks, and you need to be connected to Battle.Net to get on anyways.
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: iago on May 10, 2005, 07:25:06 PM
No you don't.

Discuss this somewhere else, this isn't the appropriate thread :P
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: rabbit on May 10, 2005, 08:06:02 PM
Yeah you do, event SphtBot says so.
Title: Re: Current Rules
Post by: Warrior on May 10, 2005, 09:21:28 PM
You don't need to be. You can just say <Not Connected> for everything =P
Title: Re: [split] Other Chat Mediums
Post by: rabbit on May 11, 2005, 04:00:09 PM
You need to use inet_addr() on the server IP, and for no apparent reason I can't get it to work when I'm not actually connected to the server.
Title: Re: [split] Other Chat Mediums
Post by: 01Linux on May 12, 2005, 02:53:26 PM
Code Select
[11:53:56] BinaryChat (*BinaryChat%31) is on the BotNet under database [vL] (with read access) from channel <Not logged on> on server 63.240.202.134.

Anyways, MSN chatrooms = x86 new home.
Title: Re: [split] Other Chat Mediums
Post by: rabbit on May 12, 2005, 06:32:15 PM
Quote from: darkxir on May 12, 2005, 02:53:26 PM
[11:53:56] BinaryChat (*BinaryChat%31) is on the BotNet under database [vL] (with read access) from channel <Not logged on> on server 63.240.202.134[/size].
I win.
Title: Re: [split] Other Chat Mediums
Post by: Joe on May 12, 2005, 09:55:18 PM
0xFFFFFFFF

255.255.255.255

Its an IP. Get over it.
Title: Re: [split] Other Chat Mediums
Post by: Warrior on May 12, 2005, 10:22:52 PM
yes, use 255.255.255.255 when not connected.
Title: Re: [split] Other Chat Mediums
Post by: Krazed on May 13, 2005, 01:49:00 PM
He stretched the tables, I say we have him killed. Anyway, I say we move to IRC! 100%!
Title: Re: [split] Other Chat Mediums
Post by: rabbit on May 13, 2005, 02:33:26 PM
Quote from: Warrior on May 12, 2005, 10:22:52 PM
yes, use 255.255.255.255 when not connected.
Tried it, didn't work
Text only | Text with Images