Clan x86

General Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: Armin on September 12, 2008, 02:07:58 AM

Title: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Armin on September 12, 2008, 02:07:58 AM
What's a good, slick bit torrent client? I used to use Azureus, but it has become over-bloated as a media portal.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: MyndFyre on September 12, 2008, 02:34:32 AM
I <3 BitTornado
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 02:52:00 AM
If you're looking for a super lightweight client, rtorrent is pretty awesome.  By itself, it's all operated through a terminal, though.  Getting used to it takes a while, but it's really nice when you do.  I has XMLRPC support and I think there are a few clients (some are even web-based) that make use of that.

If you're on windows, I think utorrent is a pretty common one.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Newby on September 12, 2008, 03:12:14 AM
uTorrent. Micro torrent. Whatever it's called.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: MyndFyre on September 12, 2008, 03:25:27 AM
Quote from: Newby on September 12, 2008, 03:12:14 AM
uTorrent. Micro torrent. Whatever it's called.
OMG, muTorrent.  MU.  µ!!!!!!
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: rabbit on September 12, 2008, 08:02:59 AM
Azureus still has classic mode, where the media layer crap isn't even loaded...
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 10:12:30 AM
Quote from: MyndFyre on September 12, 2008, 03:25:27 AM
Quote from: Newby on September 12, 2008, 03:12:14 AM
uTorrent. Micro torrent. Whatever it's called.
OMG, muTorrent.  MU.  µ!!!!!!

Their website is utorrent.com.  The names are used interchangeably. :P
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Blaze on September 12, 2008, 10:29:14 AM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 10:12:30 AM
Quote from: MyndFyre on September 12, 2008, 03:25:27 AM
Quote from: Newby on September 12, 2008, 03:12:14 AM
uTorrent. Micro torrent. Whatever it's called.
OMG, muTorrent.  MU.  µ!!!!!!

Their website is utorrent.com.  The names are used interchangeably. :P

Only because you can't register µtorrent.com.  :P
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 11:08:45 AM
Quote from: Blaze on September 12, 2008, 10:29:14 AM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 10:12:30 AM
Quote from: MyndFyre on September 12, 2008, 03:25:27 AM
Quote from: Newby on September 12, 2008, 03:12:14 AM
uTorrent. Micro torrent. Whatever it's called.
OMG, muTorrent.  MU.  µ!!!!!!

Their website is utorrent.com.  The names are used interchangeably. :P

Only because you can't register µtorrent.com.  :P

No, but you can register muTorrent.com. :P
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Blaze on September 12, 2008, 11:14:00 AM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 11:08:45 AM
Quote from: Blaze on September 12, 2008, 10:29:14 AM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 10:12:30 AM
Quote from: MyndFyre on September 12, 2008, 03:25:27 AM
Quote from: Newby on September 12, 2008, 03:12:14 AM
uTorrent. Micro torrent. Whatever it's called.
OMG, muTorrent.  MU.  µ!!!!!!

Their website is utorrent.com.  The names are used interchangeably. :P

Only because you can't register µtorrent.com.  :P

No, but you can register muTorrent.com. :P

muTorrrent.com would confuse people.  Most people I know don't even know it's micro torrent.  :P
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 11:31:39 AM
Quote from: Blaze on September 12, 2008, 11:14:00 AM
muTorrrent.com would confuse people.  Most people I know don't even know it's micro torrent.  :P

Maybe, but that's irrelevant.  Most people still call it utorrent. :)
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Towelie on September 12, 2008, 11:42:28 AM
uTorrent is good.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: iago on September 12, 2008, 11:46:53 AM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 02:52:00 AM
If you're looking for a super lightweight client, rtorrent is pretty awesome.  By itself, it's all operated through a terminal, though.  Getting used to it takes a while, but it's really nice when you do.  I has XMLRPC support and I think there are a few clients (some are even web-based) that make use of that.
rtorrent is awesome. :)
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Armin on September 12, 2008, 12:01:32 PM
µtorrent it is! Seems very light-weight. Loads incredibly fast compared to classic Azureus. Thanks.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Hitmen on September 12, 2008, 12:14:46 PM
Quote from: Metal Militia on September 12, 2008, 12:01:32 PM
µtorrent it is! Seems very light-weight. Loads incredibly fast compared to classic Azureus. Thanks.
Yeah, that's why I use it. It has a lot of the stupid features that I never use but like having without (as much) bloat as Azureus, doesn't hog resources nearly as much.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 01:29:00 PM
Quote from: iago on September 12, 2008, 11:46:53 AM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 02:52:00 AM
If you're looking for a super lightweight client, rtorrent is pretty awesome.  By itself, it's all operated through a terminal, though.  Getting used to it takes a while, but it's really nice when you do.  I has XMLRPC support and I think there are a few clients (some are even web-based) that make use of that.
rtorrent is awesome. :)

It sure is!  I was able to get a pretty sweet torrent setup going using it, vmware and a bit of perl.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Camel on September 12, 2008, 02:03:34 PM
For lightness, µTorrent is definitely the winner for Windows. BitRocket seems to be the lighweightiest for OSX.

However, if you've only switched because of the crap they added with Vuze, as rabbit said, you can disable that. I won't be at all shocked if they end up disabling it by default in future versions, because of the amount of people that have stopped using it due to the confusion. I'd definitely say give it another shot; it hasn't actually gotten any more bloaty than it ever was, as long as you turn of Vuze.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Armin on September 12, 2008, 03:07:44 PM
After seeing how fast µTorrent is, I have no reason to go back to classic Azureus.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: while1 on September 12, 2008, 03:24:23 PM
I use a combination of KTorrent and Azureus on linux.  Any torrents I want to just download and not seed, I use KTorrent.  Any torrents I plan on seeding/or am downloading from a private tracker and care about my share ratio, I use Azureus.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Explicit on September 12, 2008, 03:36:57 PM
µTorrent ftw. I run it in WINE.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Joe on September 12, 2008, 07:36:33 PM
I run microTorrent on my laptop, 200MHz processor, 64MB RAM. VERY efficient.

By the way, is it moo or mew?
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: MyndFyre on September 12, 2008, 07:41:13 PM
Quote from: Joe on September 12, 2008, 07:36:33 PM
I run microTorrent on my laptop, 200MHz processor, 64MB RAM. VERY efficient.

By the way, is it moo or mew?

µ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9C).  Duh.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 07:42:15 PM
Quote from: Joe on September 12, 2008, 07:36:33 PM
I run microTorrent on my laptop, 200MHz processor, 64MB RAM. VERY efficient.

By the way, is it moo or mew?

I've always heard it pronounced "mew", although I'd imagine people from other regions pronounce it differently.
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: iago on September 12, 2008, 07:48:22 PM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 07:42:15 PM
Quote from: Joe on September 12, 2008, 07:36:33 PM
I run microTorrent on my laptop, 200MHz processor, 64MB RAM. VERY efficient.

By the way, is it moo or mew?

I've always heard it pronounced "mew", although I'd imagine people from other regions pronounce it differently.

We say "mew" here, too, and we're all aboot pronouncing things differently up here, eh?
Title: Re: BitTorrent Client
Post by: MyndFyre on September 12, 2008, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: iago on September 12, 2008, 07:48:22 PM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 12, 2008, 07:42:15 PM
Quote from: Joe on September 12, 2008, 07:36:33 PM
I run microTorrent on my laptop, 200MHz processor, 64MB RAM. VERY efficient.

By the way, is it moo or mew?

I've always heard it pronounced "mew", although I'd imagine people from other regions pronounce it differently.

We say "mew" here, too, and we're all aboot pronouncing things differently up here, eh?

I think you're more about spelling things incorrectly than pronouncing them differently. :P