Which do you prefer, and why?
RhythmBox.
But I liked Foobar over Winamp. Winamp crashed and burned my entire library once. Eh.
I haven't used Winamp in years. I used to use it all the time, though. About the time they introduced the version that played videos was when I stopped using it.
I used Winamp a lot but now I just use iTunes. Didn't really like Foobar though the few times I used it.
I still use winamp, and love it.
I've used winamp for like 10000 years but started playing with foobar lately. It can take some effort to set up but it's pretty hot:
(http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/1906/foobar.png)
Fast and lightweight even with a huge library. (using like 4mb of ram when playing in the background)
Winamp is easier to just play a couple files in but I'm starting to like foobar a lot more for having all my music in it.
On OS X, I'm just using iTunes. :P
That's a pretty Foobar, btw.
Quote from: Hitmen on May 04, 2009, 02:42:18 PM
I've used winamp for like 10000 years but started playing with foobar lately. It can take some effort to set up but it's pretty hot:
(http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/1906/foobar.png)
Fast and lightweight even with a huge library. (using like 4mb of ram when playing in the background)
Winamp is easier to just play a couple files in but I'm starting to like foobar a lot more for having all my music in it.
This has inspired me to listen to Artillery ;P
Downloading foobar now. I hate iTunes, way too bulky/slow.
I've been using fb2k for years, never looked back.
Artillery is the shit.