Has anything changed since I've left? If so I'd like to know since I may consider re-joining just to annoy iago once again.
If we say nothing has changed, will you want to rejoin? :)
It is up to you to find out. :P
I don't think anything's really changed. It's always been a good clan, and always will be.
However, since you left, I'm not prepared to give you approval to join.
Quote from: iago on October 27, 2005, 08:47:42 PM
It's always been a good clan, and always will be.
Yes.
Quote from: iago on October 27, 2005, 08:47:42 PM
I don't think anything's really changed. It's always been a good clan, and always will be.
However, since you left, I'm not prepared to give you approval to join.
Do you guys do anything outside battle.net? I've sorta exited that phase so I was just curious.
We use the forums, and I still use #x86 on irc.tehnet.org...
Do we do anything WITH Battle.net? I don't really think so..
Quote from: Networks on October 27, 2005, 08:40:18 PM
Has anything changed since I've left? If so I'd like to know since I may consider re-joining just to annoy iago once again.
Hahaha, I knew you should have just gone inactive. :P
I would give you approval. I'd have to. You're my hometown homie. :)
Why'd he leave again?
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg35835#msg35835 date=1130471072]
Why'd he leave again?
I think it was the lack of maturity (channel stuff), boringness, no benefits really, and Joe?
I suppose 1/4 isn't bad unless something has changed? :P (jk!)
Why would you want to rejoin, has anything changed?
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg35857#msg35857 date=1130497190]
Why would you want to rejoin, has anything changed?
1st: Not as much Joe now.
2nd: Our average B.net channel activity consists of this;
Quote
[6:24:33 AM] -- x86 has left the channel.
[6:24:55 AM] -- iago[x86] has left the channel.
[7:12:22 AM] -- iago[x86] [265ms] has joined the channel using Starcraft Brood War (0 wins).
[7:15:11 AM] -- x86 [94ms] has joined the channel using Warcraft II (0 wins).
[7:15:11 AM] -- x86 has acquired ops.
Quote from: Networks on October 28, 2005, 01:54:37 AM
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg35835#msg35835 date=1130471072]
Why'd he leave again?
I think it was the lack of maturity (channel stuff), boringness, no benefits really, and Joe?
I suppose 1/4 isn't bad unless something has changed? :P (jk!)
Funny, I slightly remember you leaving in asshole-mode, almost like you're too good for x86.
Quote from: Scr33n0r on October 28, 2005, 08:02:15 AM
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg35857#msg35857 date=1130497190]
Why would you want to rejoin, has anything changed?
1st: Not as much Joe now.
2nd: Our average B.net channel activity consists of this;
Quote
[6:24:33 AM] -- x86 has left the channel.
[6:24:55 AM] -- iago[x86] has left the channel.
[7:12:22 AM] -- iago[x86] [265ms] has joined the channel using Starcraft Brood War (0 wins).
[7:15:11 AM] -- x86 [94ms] has joined the channel using Warcraft II (0 wins).
[7:15:11 AM] -- x86 has acquired ops.
Quote from: Networks on October 28, 2005, 01:54:37 AM
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg35835#msg35835 date=1130471072]
Why'd he leave again?
I think it was the lack of maturity (channel stuff), boringness, no benefits really, and Joe?
I suppose 1/4 isn't bad unless something has changed? :P (jk!)
Funny, I slightly remember you leaving in asshole-mode, almost like you're too good for x86.
Yeah you were in the clan so you would remember. I don't have to discuss it with you because you're talking out of your ass right now.
Hell if iago's even twice as active than before then it's a good enough reason to join but oh well I guess.
Quote from: Networks on October 28, 2005, 09:45:28 AM
Quote from: Scr33n0r on October 28, 2005, 08:02:15 AM
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg35857#msg35857 date=1130497190]
Why would you want to rejoin, has anything changed?
1st: Not as much Joe now.
2nd: Our average B.net channel activity consists of this;
Quote
[6:24:33 AM] -- x86 has left the channel.
[6:24:55 AM] -- iago[x86] has left the channel.
[7:12:22 AM] -- iago[x86] [265ms] has joined the channel using Starcraft Brood War (0 wins).
[7:15:11 AM] -- x86 [94ms] has joined the channel using Warcraft II (0 wins).
[7:15:11 AM] -- x86 has acquired ops.
Quote from: Networks on October 28, 2005, 01:54:37 AM
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg35835#msg35835 date=1130471072]
Why'd he leave again?
I think it was the lack of maturity (channel stuff), boringness, no benefits really, and Joe?
I suppose 1/4 isn't bad unless something has changed? :P (jk!)
Funny, I slightly remember you leaving in asshole-mode, almost like you're too good for x86.
Yeah you were in the clan so you would remember. I don't have to discuss it with you because you're talking out of your ass right now.
Hell if iago's even twice as active than before then it's a good enough reason to join but oh well I guess.
You missed, I'm typing. iago has a life, so go back to zeroforce if you want to be a falming idiot.
And P.S. -- I don't need to be in the clan to hear what goes on.
Let's try to keep this post between Networks and x86.
Now, is Joe the only reason you left because you stated more. We are under new leadership but I'd like other members to know why you want to rejoin which might affect thier decision.
Good luck,
Nelson
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg35885#msg35885 date=1130528106]
Let's try to keep this post between Networks and x86.
Now, is Joe the only reason you left because you stated more. We are under new leadership but I'd like other members to know why you want to rejoin which might affect thier decision.
Good luck,
Nelson
Honestly, if there's anything to do I'd like to rejoin otherwise bleh it's a waste of both our times. Basically if there's more to do than just loading a tag...
Theres only as much as you or anyone else wants to do.
Quote from: Scr33n0r on October 28, 2005, 08:02:15 AM
2nd: Our average B.net channel activity consists of this;
Quote
[6:24:33 AM] -- x86 has left the channel.
[6:24:55 AM] -- iago[x86] has left the channel.
[7:12:22 AM] -- iago[x86] [265ms] has joined the channel using Starcraft Brood War (0 wins).
[7:15:11 AM] -- x86 [94ms] has joined the channel using Warcraft II (0 wins).
[7:15:11 AM] -- x86 has acquired ops.
And most channels are busy at 7AM? As other said, I'd appreciate it if you'd stay out of topics like this.
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg35894#msg35894 date=1130536609]
Theres only as much as you or anyone else wants to do.
You're absolutely correct. If any member wants to start a project, host an event, get a game going, team up on a problem, create a website, etc., they are free to do so, and are free to let other members join you.
If you need help with something, require a favor, need a server to test something on, need a friend whose shoulder to cry on (*shrug*), need some inspiration, etc., the other members of the clan will often be willing to help. I can't speak for others, but I can usually provde anything listed there, within reason.
But you know what everything I've listed here have in common? They're things that friends do for each other. That's what this clan is based on: friendship. Every once in awhile, we have to step back and remind ourselves of that, but in the end, that's what it really is.
However, like any friends, or club, we have disagreements, and the only way to solve those is to discuss it. It's especially difficult if members have opposing views, which is usually the case (by definition of a disagreement, in fact...), but so far we've always managed. All I really ask is that you respect each other's opinions and beliefs, and have fun doing it. There's nothing wrong with poking fun; in fact, in the words of a good friend of mine, "It's the responsibility of any good friend to make fun of you if you do something stupid; how else are you going to know?" At the time, we were talking about how a common friend of ours dresses (faded pants, whatever they're called, look sooo gay), but it's still a good quote.
If, however, the rest of the clan is having a discussion (read: argument) about something, and you decide to leave (especially if it's the result of other member complaining about a friend of yours; a friend that totally let you take the fall for somebody else as a result of what you said, when it came down to it, but don't get me started on that), that's your decision. If you don't like what you see, then you can leave. However, when you're done being mad (or annoyed, or whatever), don't come back to me and ask me if you can join again. Although it's not a rule, it's a custom in my book that, if somebody is willing to give up what we have once, they're far too likely to do it again, and thus, I'm not prepared to honor their request to rejoin. It's not because I don't like them, it's because they were given a chance, and turned their back, and now it's just too bad.
Hope this whole long post makes sense. A lot of this stuff came from the very foundation of how I wanted x86 to be, and how it has developed. I'm glad it ended up posted in a publicly-viewable forum, because it's valuable for anybody in or out of the clan to see.
I didn't leave over the whole fiasco, I am much more loyal than that (usually...). heh but if I don't get your approval doesn't seem like I have much of a chance then anyway.
Of course you still have a chance.
But that brings up the question: why did you leave? And what has changed?
Quote from: iago on October 29, 2005, 12:40:12 PM
Of course you still have a chance.
But that brings up the question: why did you leave? And what has changed?
I believe that post is in the members forum. What has changed? Evidentally nothing (according to you guys =\) except Joe is gone.
I'm not entirely sure why you DID leave, even after reading posts regarding it. The only thing I'm aware of is problems we had regarding Teh User (which has since been resolved, and hasn't been brought up again). If you don't like the fact that the clan has arguments on important issues, then find yourself a clan that has a strict structure. The way x86 is designed, the leaders don't have a lot of power, and all members are equal to each other, and nearly equal to the leaders. There is only one way to resolve problems, and it's exactly how we do it. And so far, it's worked.
I think it had much to do with: Way to many arguments, Nothing to really participate in (I found myself just loading a tag and that's it) which contributed to no benefits, and lots of stupidity in the channel primarily influenced by Trust (oh well), plus you were kind of dead, and then the whole TehUser thing. All of these were entirely different things from the x86 I joined before when there were 8-10 members.
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 10:00:01 AM
Way to many arguments
Quote from: iago on October 30, 2005, 01:29:18 AM
If you don't like the fact that the clan has arguments on important issues, then find yourself a clan that has a strict structure.
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 10:00:01 AM
Nothing to really participate in (I found myself just loading a tag and that's it) which contributed to no benefits
Well, there are the forums, and you're always welcome to try and get members to do something.
The idea is that we're more of a clan based on friendship. Sure, finding common interests can be difficult, but if you are bored, find something to do. See if you can get some clan members together to game. It isn't hard.
Benefits? Well, you get to throw your opinion in to how the clan is run or what you feel needs change, which is a benefit in itself.
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 10:00:01 AM
lots of stupidity in the channel primarily influenced by Trust (oh well)
All you had to do was post and say, "I don't like Trust being in the channel. Can we leave him on autoban?"
Simple as that. No more trust-being-immature problem for you to put up with.
It is also called squelch, if a few members want him in the channel for whatever reason they have. Hell, if your bot has decent filters, filter his name.
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 10:00:01 AM
plus you were kind of dead
So, you joined x86 because of iago and iago alone? Or are you saying you felt he was the only one who could deal with the problems stated above?
I'm not sure I want you in the clan at that point if you feel either one. If it's the former, there are 20 or so other members who would love to talk with you; if it's the latter, well...
Quote from: iago on October 30, 2005, 01:29:18 AM
The way x86 is designed, the leaders don't have a lot of power, and all members are equal to each other, and nearly equal to the leaders. There is only one way to resolve problems, and it's exactly how we do it. And so far, it's worked.
You (or any other member, for that matter) could have addressed problems, and attempted to solve them, instead of leaving.
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 10:00:01 AM
and then the whole TehUser thing.
/me shakes his head.
You and zorm... *mumbles*
Well, that problem solved itself.
I still think it is immature that you felt the need to tell TehUser what we were saying about him. I see the reasoning behind it, but there are other morals you are breaking by telling him than there are by staying silent. (Trust versus friendship... hmm... you picked friendship!)
Although I am thankful you didn't tell TehUser specifics, although you lead to specifics being told.
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 10:00:01 AM
All of these were entirely different things from the x86 I joined before when there were 8-10 members.
Well, that's what happens when time passes by. Shit changes.
Although I really can't say there's been much more to do as a clan than there was when the clan was started...
Quote
Although I really can't say there's been much more to do as a clan than there was when the clan was started...
That's kind of a sad part about x86.
I didn't join x86 for iago but him and WiReS were great reasons. I didn't really know the rest except by mere aquaintence. Hell I still don't know you Newby. If I were to have joined because of iago I would've done so in the beginning.
The Trust thing, I didn't want to ban a person everyone seemed to like a little bit. I figured it would cause more problems.
Also, I did throw my opinion in quite a bit nothing seemed to change. However it seems more calm now. Really now I am just trying to get a feel how everyone does feel about me. (doesn't seem like it's in my favor though)
Also I am happy with me leaving because I wouldn't have ever known iago knew the extended lie of what happened in the private forums and he probably would've still been really indifferent towards me.
Well put.
Quote from: Newby on October 30, 2005, 04:20:32 PM
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 10:00:01 AM
plus you were kind of dead
So, you joined x86 because of iago and iago alone? Or are you saying you felt he was the only one who could deal with the problems stated above?
I'm not sure I want you in the clan at that point if you feel either one. If it's the former, there are 20 or so other members who would love to talk with you; if it's the latter, well...
I've never really been more or less active. I'm not active on Battle.net, certainly. But I am quite active on the forum and by email. And at the time you left, I was spending a lot of time on instant messengers, but lately i haven't logged on because I've been extremely busy.
Quote from: Newby on October 30, 2005, 04:20:32 PM
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 10:00:01 AM
and then the whole TehUser thing.
/me shakes his head.
You and zorm... *mumbles*
Well, that problem solved itself.
I still think it is immature that you felt the need to tell TehUser what we were saying about him. I see the reasoning behind it, but there are other morals you are breaking by telling him than there are by staying silent. (Trust versus friendship... hmm... you picked friendship!)
Although I am thankful you didn't tell TehUser specifics, although you lead to specifics being told.
I don't think there was any problem with how Networks behaved in that situation. However, I find it ironic how he defended Teh User, then, when Networks got blamed for leaking all the information (and Teh User and Zorm knew it), they totally let Networks take the fall. How ironic! :-)
And by the way, feel free to share anything I've said here with Teh User. I don't want him to think I'm talking behind his back.
And Networks posted while I was typing, so....
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 05:33:19 PM
The Trust thing, I didn't want to ban a person everyone seemed to like a little bit. I figured it would cause more problems.
However it seems more calm now.
Don't forget, you can't see the member's forum. You never really know what's happening!
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 05:33:19 PM
Really now I am just trying to get a feel how everyone does feel about me. (doesn't seem like it's in my favor though)
I don't have any paricularly strong feelings about you. I don't want to give approval more on general principle (and deterrance) than because I have feelings about you :-P
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 05:33:19 PM
Also, I did throw my opinion in quite a bit nothing seemed to change. However it seems more calm now. Really now I am just trying to get a feel how everyone does feel about me. (doesn't seem like it's in my favor though)
Well, personally, I think it was sad that you left the clan over whatever issues you did, and didn't even bother to hang around the community afterwards.
x86 was never meant to be a clan where all the members shared one common interest. It wouldn't have the great member base it does today if that was the truth.
The clan CAN have one common interest, but we don't force it upon members.
You'd like to rejoin because we are "calmer" now? What if we arn't "calm" in the future? Will you leave again?
Quote from: Newby on October 30, 2005, 05:47:31 PM
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 05:33:19 PM
Also, I did throw my opinion in quite a bit nothing seemed to change. However it seems more calm now. Really now I am just trying to get a feel how everyone does feel about me. (doesn't seem like it's in my favor though)
Well, personally, I think it was sad that you left the clan over whatever issues you did, and didn't even bother to hang around the community afterwards.
x86 was never meant to be a clan where all the members shared one common interest. It wouldn't have the great member base it does today if that was the truth.
The clan CAN have one common interest, but we don't force it upon members.
Newby I didn't remain in the community because I was EXTREMELY BUSY, nothing was priority except studying for the ACT, picking colleges, and school. It will still remain that way forever. It is afterall my senior year, you'll understand when you get there unless you decide to go in-state (it's less complicated then).
Also Newby, you're completely right about this:
Quote
x86 was never meant to be a clan where all the members shared one common interest. It wouldn't have the great member base it does today if that was the truth.
And it's also the reason I want to join because I've phased bnet out of my system about 70%, and now I feel like I may be able to spark some interest in the clan through my new interests and hobbies I feel like starting, now that I have more time. (this one is for Warrior)
iago, I think it really came down to whether he could say nothing about me except what was know or he'd rat out Zorm. I don't know if he pricisely said I showed him the forums or not but it seems like he just kept silent.
Edit: I know I hated when I never really knew who was joining so feel free to IM on AIM (N3TWORK5) if you don't know me, most of you new people probably joined right before I left.
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 06:33:38 PM
iago, I think it really came down to whether he could say nothing about me except what was know or he'd rat out Zorm. I don't know if he pricisely said I showed him the forums or not but it seems like he just kept silent.
He didn't deny it. All he told me was that you told him what people said. When everybody assumed (and he knew it) that you told him everything, he said nothing. He could have denied it without implicating Zorm.
Quote from: iago on October 30, 2005, 06:36:44 PM
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 06:33:38 PM
iago, I think it really came down to whether he could say nothing about me except what was know or he'd rat out Zorm. I don't know if he pricisely said I showed him the forums or not but it seems like he just kept silent.
He didn't deny it. All he told me was that you told him what people said. When everybody assumed (and he knew it) that you told him everything, he said nothing. He could have denied it without implicating Zorm.
Off-topic: That was your 4000th post
[17:10] Networks: you didn't even have to say Zorm's name, you could've said "I didn't get specific information from Networks"
[17:10] Teh User: I'm pretty sure I did say something to that effect.
He eventually DID say something along those lines.
Hence, why we tried to figure out who the real leaker was. :P
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 06:58:42 PM
[17:10] Networks: you didn't even have to say Zorm's name, you could've said "I didn't get specific information from Networks"
[17:10] Teh User: I'm pretty sure I did say something to that effect.
No, he mentioned information that you couldn't have known (ie, happened after you quit). That's when I realized that something had happened. It wasn't until I approached him with proof that Zorm did it that he said anything :-P
Quote from: iago on October 30, 2005, 09:27:41 PM
Quote from: Networks on October 30, 2005, 06:58:42 PM
[17:10] Networks: you didn't even have to say Zorm's name, you could've said "I didn't get specific information from Networks"
[17:10] Teh User: I'm pretty sure I did say something to that effect.
No, he mentioned information that you couldn't have known (ie, happened after you quit). That's when I realized that something had happened. It wasn't until I approached him with proof that Zorm did it that he said anything :-P
bleh, it was a long time ago and it's all in the past. I am curious to know now what whose approval I get. (not just the leaders)
Quote from: Networks on October 31, 2005, 08:43:51 AM
it was a long time ago and it's all in the past
Technically speaking, it wasn't all THAT long ago... :P
It IS in the past, though. As is every letter I already typed, and every post in this thread, and in every other thread, etc. :)
*bump* Hi
QuoteThe idea is that we're more of a clan based on friendship. Sure, finding common interests can be difficult, but if you are bored, find something to do. See if you can get some clan members together to game. It isn't hard.
Oh yes it is. >:(
Quote from: WiReS on November 10, 2005, 10:35:16 PM
QuoteThe idea is that we're more of a clan based on friendship. Sure, finding common interests can be difficult, but if you are bored, find something to do. See if you can get some clan members together to game. It isn't hard.
Oh yes it is. >:(
That's because you and I are like the only ones that game, and I've been busy++.
Quote from: deadly7 on November 10, 2005, 10:38:25 PM
Quote from: WiReS on November 10, 2005, 10:35:16 PM
QuoteThe idea is that we're more of a clan based on friendship. Sure, finding common interests can be difficult, but if you are bored, find something to do. See if you can get some clan members together to game. It isn't hard.
Oh yes it is. >:(
That's because you and I are like the only ones that game, and I've been busy++.
You jerk stop making this about seriw, he sucks at life anyway.
Okay, I'll for the time being give you my vote but of course it doesn't matter unless you get an approval.
Just don't make the mistake of leaving again if you do join.
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg38103#msg38103 date=1131863150]
Okay, I'll for the time being give you my vote but of course it doesn't matter unless you get an approval.
Just don't make the mistake of leaving again if you do join.
Myndy gave me his approval over PM so it's really up to iago and Quik I suppose. Isn't the process usually quick? (kind of?)
Quote from: Networks on November 13, 2005, 10:24:42 AM
Quote from: Warriorx86] link=topic=3513.msg38103#msg38103 date=1131863150]
Okay, I'll for the time being give you my vote but of course it doesn't matter unless you get an approval.
Just don't make the mistake of leaving again if you do join.
Myndy gave me his approval over PM so it's really up to iago and Quik I suppose. Isn't the process usually quick? (kind of?)
I've already said in this thread that I don't plan on giving approval.
In other words, talk to Quik. He's usually good at making fast decisions (that's why he's called Quick!)
Quote from: iago on November 14, 2005, 11:51:29 PM
He's usually good at making fast decisions
LOL, after ALL THE CRAP YOU GAVE QUIK (http://www.x86labs.org/forum/index.php/topic,3706.msg38133.html#msg38133), you still say that? :P
Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=3513.msg38622#msg38622 date=1132030419]
Quote from: iago on November 14, 2005, 11:51:29 PM
He's usually good at making fast decisions
LOL, after ALL THE CRAP YOU GAVE QUIK (http://www.x86labs.org/forum/index.php/topic,3706.msg38133.html#msg38133), you still say that? :P
I was trying to be funny by poking at an inside joke. Thanks for ruining it, jerk ;)
I hate you bastards. I hope you burn in hell. All of you. ALL OF YOU.
Networks, talk to me. I will make you go through a slow and grueling process involving sending me $15,000 to unfreeze my account and allow me to pay you back in full with the investments and assets beyond your wildest dreams.
Quote from: Quik on November 15, 2005, 12:04:11 AM
I hate you bastards. I hope you burn in hell. All of you. ALL OF YOU.
Networks, talk to me. I will make you go through a slow and grueling process involving sending me $15,000 to unfreeze my account and allow me to pay you back in full with the investments and assets beyond your wildest dreams.
Pfft, I'll give him approval for $10000.
Lmao.
Silly iago! Left yourself wide open there. :P
Hehe, just kidding <3
Quote from: iago on November 15, 2005, 12:47:01 AM
Quote from: Quik on November 15, 2005, 12:04:11 AM
I hate you bastards. I hope you burn in hell. All of you. ALL OF YOU.
Networks, talk to me. I will make you go through a slow and grueling process involving sending me $15,000 to unfreeze my account and allow me to pay you back in full with the investments and assets beyond your wildest dreams.
Pfft, I'll give him approval for $10000.
Sold, to the candian in the top hat.
Networks, you do have the approval of 2 leaders. Your vote may commence.
Quote from: iago on November 22, 2005, 10:46:59 PM
Networks, you do have the approval of 2 leaders. Your vote may commence.
Thank you Quik and Myndy. Thanks for the info iago.
There's been some confusion.
When you PM'ed me saying you were joking, were you joking that you wanted to join? I can't think of anything else that you'd be joking about, but it doesn't seem like you were, so I'm not really sure....
Quote from: iago on November 23, 2005, 07:47:40 PM
There's been some confusion.
When you PM'ed me saying you were joking, were you joking that you wanted to join? I can't think of anything else that you'd be joking about, but it doesn't seem like you were, so I'm not really sure....
About the misspelling thing in the game forum thread...I wasn't trying to piss you off but w/e.
Quote from: Networks on November 23, 2005, 07:50:03 PM
Quote from: iago on November 23, 2005, 07:47:40 PM
There's been some confusion.
When you PM'ed me saying you were joking, were you joking that you wanted to join? I can't think of anything else that you'd be joking about, but it doesn't seem like you were, so I'm not really sure....
About the misspelling thing in the game forum thread...I wasn't trying to piss you off but w/e.
If I'd been asked a few minutes ago about who said that spelling thing, I wouldn't have known. I don't pay attention to names when people do annoying stuff like that, I just move on.
But you sent me a PM saying you were joking shortly after I posted that you had approval here. Bad timing, miscommunication, it's all straightened up. Nevermind :-P
And regarding the PM I replied with, judge it based on what I thought you meant (you were joking about re-joining), not what you actually meant.
On a side note, your vote failed. You received 6 no's.
06/21 = June 21st. I mean 28.57%, which is > 25.00%, which means you couldn't get the minimum of 75% approval to join.
Nice try, though. You're always welcome to try and rejoin in the future. :)
Quote from: Newby on November 30, 2005, 11:20:36 PM
On a side note, your vote failed. You received 6 no's.
06/21 = June 21st. I mean 28.57%, which is > 25.00%, which means you couldn't get the minimum of 75% approval to join.
Nice try, though. You're always welcome to try and rejoin in the future. :)
I suspect the main reason is because he isn't active enough here. Many of the newer members don't know who he is.
Quote from: iago on December 01, 2005, 08:52:54 PM
I suspect the main reason is because he isn't active enough here. Many of the newer members don't know who he is.
I would guess the same. :)
There's only two NEW members....(Ergot and Gamesnake) I wouldn't say that's the main reason and I had school (Remember: I was applying for colleges since the beginning of school and now)
Quote from: Networks on December 02, 2005, 06:28:44 PM
There's only two NEW members....(Ergot and Gamesnake) I wouldn't say that's the main reason and I had school (Remember: I was applying for colleges since the beginning of school and now)
I see how it is, I'll be one my way now.
Quote from: Networks on December 02, 2005, 06:28:44 PM
There's only two NEW members....(Ergot and Gamesnake) I wouldn't say that's the main reason and I had school (Remember: I was applying for colleges since the beginning of school and now)
Blaze and Ergot joined after me. ;D
Quote from: Blaze on December 02, 2005, 07:17:01 PM
Quote from: Networks on December 02, 2005, 06:28:44 PM
There's only two NEW members....(Ergot and Gamesnake) I wouldn't say that's the main reason and I had school (Remember: I was applying for colleges since the beginning of school and now)
I see how it is, I'll be one my way now.
Oh, I forgot, sorry Blaze. I forgot about you because I actually knew you! So it's plus.
Quote from: Networks on December 03, 2005, 02:57:52 PM
Quote from: Blaze on December 02, 2005, 07:17:01 PM
Quote from: Networks on December 02, 2005, 06:28:44 PM
There's only two NEW members....(Ergot and Gamesnake) I wouldn't say that's the main reason and I had school (Remember: I was applying for colleges since the beginning of school and now)
I see how it is, I'll be one my way now.
Oh, I forgot, sorry Blaze. I forgot about you because I actually knew you! So it's plus.
By the way, w hen you only need 5 no's to fail, having 3 people who don't really know you makes a significant difference.
Quote from: iago on December 03, 2005, 05:13:33 PM
Quote from: Networks on December 03, 2005, 02:57:52 PM
Quote from: Blaze on December 02, 2005, 07:17:01 PM
Quote from: Networks on December 02, 2005, 06:28:44 PM
There's only two NEW members....(Ergot and Gamesnake) I wouldn't say that's the main reason and I had school (Remember: I was applying for colleges since the beginning of school and now)
I see how it is, I'll be one my way now.
Oh, I forgot, sorry Blaze. I forgot about you because I actually knew you! So it's plus.
By the way, w hen you only need 5 no's to fail, having 3 people who don't really know you makes a significant difference.
Yea :( He never talks to me on AIM
Quote from: iago on December 03, 2005, 05:13:33 PM
Quote from: Networks on December 03, 2005, 02:57:52 PM
Quote from: Blaze on December 02, 2005, 07:17:01 PM
Quote from: Networks on December 02, 2005, 06:28:44 PM
There's only two NEW members....(Ergot and Gamesnake) I wouldn't say that's the main reason and I had school (Remember: I was applying for colleges since the beginning of school and now)
I see how it is, I'll be one my way now.
Oh, I forgot, sorry Blaze. I forgot about you because I actually knew you! So it's plus.
By the way, w hen you only need 5 no's to fail, having 3 people who don't really know you makes a significant difference.
pfffft 2*, I know Blaze we talk more then I talk to you on aim these days :P. Ergot I don't even know you aim s/n...so yeah.